• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Train derailment near Córdoba, Spain

Status
Not open for further replies.

mpthomson

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
1,384
In almost all railway accidents, the immediate cause (what happened) is quickly apparent and can be deduced by most railway professionals or even in many cases by enthusiasts, from a few clear pictures of the aftermath. The main job of investigators is far more complex - to establish the root causes - ‘why did it happen?’…
He's guessing, unless he's on the ground in Spain and has access to the investigation. And we can safely assume that he's not and doesn't.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It's hardly uninformed speculation given who the speculation is from.
Without access to the investigation that's exactly what it is...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

azOOOOOma

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2023
Messages
303
Location
Durham
Do we think that the Renfe collided almost immediately after the derailment of the Iryo?

Just in 2026 I would suspect everyone to be videoing/live-streaming on Iryo and for there to be footage or audio of the collision.

The lack of this makes me wonder if it was all super quick and that there was no time between derailment and collision.

Given that in recent years we’ve had someone livestreaming an actual plane crash (!) and also someone filming their escape from an upside down crashed jet, I find it odd that there’s a lack of audio/video of a collision.
 

Peterthegreat

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
1,802
Location
South Yorkshire
He's guessing, unless he's on the ground in Spain and has access to the investigation. And we can safely assume that he's not and doesn't.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Without access to the investigation that's exactly what it is...
Totally agree. He may very well be right but he is implying it as fact and not his own opinion.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
4,094
Without speculating as to why it does appear that the rear of the northbound IRYO train derailed partially fouling the southbound track. The RENFE train then made a glancing blow on the wreckage derailing it to the right and buckling those coaches.
It’s evident that the wreckage of the RENFE train is some distance south of the IRYO one.
Sorry if this is obvious to many already but I’ve not seen any aerial shots until recently.
It looks like the Renfe train was partically derailed by the glancing blow of the nortbound derailed train and then fully derailed at the start of a set of points.
 

Nippy

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2013
Messages
740
Thank you!

I've found another video that perhaps shows where the collision might have taken place. It looks to my uneducated eye like a potential glancing blow, which would explain why the Iryo train is relatively undamaged.

View attachment 196172
If you pause the video right at the very end you can see what appears to be the facing connection (in the top right of the screen) coming from the adjacent line just ahead of where the Renfe train has come to rest. The connection appears to very badly damaged.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
6,083
Do we think that the Renfe collided almost immediately after the derailment of the Iryo?

Just in 2026 I would suspect everyone to be videoing/live-streaming on Iryo and for there to be footage or audio of the collision.

The lack of this makes me wonder if it was all super quick and that there was no time between derailment and collision.

Given that in recent years we’ve had someone livestreaming an actual plane crash (!) and also someone filming their escape from an upside down crashed jet, I find it odd that there’s a lack of audio/video of a collision.

On a dark Sunday in January, many were probably reading or snoozing.
 

cambsy

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2011
Messages
1,114
I think a fractured rail, from looks of it caused this terrible derailment and train wreck, then just extremely bad luck, meant a train travelling at high speed in the opposite direction, was too close to stop in time. I dont think any signalling system would have stopped the RENFE train as was too close to Slow down enough in time too make this accident a lot less severe. Can all rail fractures be detected with right ultrasound and detection equipment, or can certain fractures remain insidiously undetectable till they break? is rail fractures just a risk of travelling by train which can never be totally eliminated? I still see rail travel as very safe, just disaasters like these make ones think a bit about safety.
 

chrisjo

Member
Joined
18 May 2024
Messages
604
Location
Llanishen
If you pause the video right at the very end you can see what appears to be the facing connection (in the top right of the screen) coming from the adjacent line just ahead of where the Renfe train has come to rest. The connection appears to very badly damaged.
If you look on Google maps satellite view you can see where the points north and south of the 'station' are. They are not there.
 

chrisjo

Member
Joined
18 May 2024
Messages
604
Location
Llanishen
Just in 2026 I would suspect everyone to be videoing/live-streaming on Iryo and for there to be footage or audio of the collision.
It seems from the few interviews with survivors (quoted in El Pais, etc.), that the Iryo derailment was still happening when the Renfe train hit it.

BBC live says "We were in carriage five (Iryo) and we started to feel some banging on the track, nothing unusual," he tells Spanish news broadcaster, La Sexta Noticias. Then, the banging became louder, he says. Another train passed us and everything started vibrating. There was a jolt behind us and the feeling that the whole train was going to fall apart"
 

Smwrff

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2023
Messages
258
Location
Cymru Fawr
Totally agree. He may very well be right but he is implying it as fact and not his own opinion.
Gareth is not guessing - he has considered the available video evidence and presented a realistic hypothesis. He may not be on the ground or part of any official investigation but his hypothesis appears to be credible.

I expect that the final official investigation will not vary by much.
 

DerekC

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2015
Messages
2,443
Location
Hampshire (nearly a Hog)
Gareth is not guessing - he has considered the available video evidence and presented a realistic hypothesis. He may not be on the ground or part of any official investigation but his hypothesis appears to be credible.

I expect that the final official investigation will not vary by much.
But even if Gareth is right about what happened during the crash, he can't and shouldn't speculate as to which of the various underlying causes is relevant to this particular event, and that's the really important bit of the accident report. Speculation by "experts" is wrong in these circumstances - and it's the fact that contributors to this forum might be considered expert that I am sure makes the mods keep reminding us of that. In the case of the Santiago crash, headlines screaming "driver error" helped the Spanish authorities cover up the real underlying causes. Providing reasoned information as to what the various causes could be and making it clear that the conclusions must be based on the evidence can help, however.
 

Peterthegreat

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
1,802
Location
South Yorkshire
But even if Gareth is right about what happened during the crash, he can't and shouldn't speculate as to which of the various underlying causes is relevant to this particular event, and that's the really important bit of the accident report. Speculation by "experts" is wrong in these circumstances - and it's the fact that contributors to this forum might be considered expert that I am sure makes the mods keep reminding us of that. In the case of the Santiago crash, headlines screaming "driver error" helped the Spanish authorities cover up the real underlying causes. Providing reasoned information as to what the various causes could be and making it clear that the conclusions must be based on the evidence can help, however.
Absolutely. Couldn't have written a better response myself.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,809
Location
Central Belt
It looks like the Renfe train was partically derailed by the glancing blow of the nortbound derailed train and then fully derailed at the start of a set of points.
I think this is similar to great Heck with respect that there was no time to stop the train in the opposite direction before the impact. No signal system in the world could have stopped the Renfe train. If it was 5 minutes later it is very possible we wouldn't be looking much better situation. Sadly an unfortuanate set of circumstances.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,745
Location
Nottingham
Without speculating as to why it does appear that the rear of the northbound IRYO train derailed partially fouling the southbound track. The RENFE train then made a glancing blow on the wreckage derailing it to the right and buckling those coaches.
It’s evident that the wreckage of the RENFE train is some distance south of the IRYO one.
Sorry if this is obvious to many already but I’ve not seen any aerial shots until recently.
I'm thinking this separation may suggest the IRYO was still moving. The RENFE train would have come to a stop pretty quickly when it was derailed into a ditch, but the IRYO was partly on the rails and partly sliding along them so could have continued some way before it came to a stop.

An alternative explanation for the rail gap pictured above might be that there was only a single break, but as the rail was at least partly rolled over and released from the fastenings, the fracture surfaces could have moved away from the break due to forces from the wheels or from thermal contraction when no longer under tension and colder than Critical Rail Temperature. The actual break could have been a result of the accident, but I think the lack of any other damage in the vicinity makes that unlikely.
 

The Prisoner

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2012
Messages
423
For the people speculating as to the time taken for the Renfe service to hit the Iryo one it was 20 seconds according to the BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clye22ljxw4o so not enough to be able any sort of meaningful action. We don't know, but it's highly possible that the driver of the second service may well have slammed the brakes on and ultimately saved lives in doing so (in which case they are undoubtedly a hero).

I can't quote the article as the 20 seconds reference is made in a graphic as attached.
 

Attachments

  • ab547380-f551-11f0-b5f7-49f0357294ff.png copy.jpg
    ab547380-f551-11f0-b5f7-49f0357294ff.png copy.jpg
    280.7 KB · Views: 243

BahrainLad

Member
Joined
3 Aug 2015
Messages
413
Quite a few videos emerging of apparently extremely rough riding on this section of line in recent weeks. Certainly rougher than I’ve ever witnessed on LGV Nord, for example.
 

Angmering1974

On Moderation
Joined
26 Jun 2023
Messages
162
Location
UK
The failure of a track weld at kilometer 318.7, specifically on track L-10717 number 23117 as it passes through Adamuz (Córdoba), is the cause of the derailment of the Iryo 6189 train, as confirmed by investigators, ABC has learned.


As a total layman: why would a track be welded at all versus just replacing a piece of track?
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
7,602
Location
Torbay
It's possible facing points south of the impact site contributed to the spread of the southbound train wreckage. If some axles had been derailed in the initial collision, once those wheels got to the turnout area, bouncing along the sleepers, they may have been diverted sideways more radically when hitting the turnout rails, as at Ufton Nervet in 2004.

In another turnout-related incident, the Gotthard base tunnel derailment of 2023, a single broken axle with a wheel dragging in the four foot made contact with components of a point machine linkage resulting in the switches moving from the straight to turnout position under the train, diverting following freight vehicles into a crossover tunnel, where they derailed and piled up, damaging the airtight safety door.
 

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,831
Location
West is best

As a total layman: why would a track be welded at all versus just replacing a piece of track?
Rails are welded together on high speed lines. It's a more robust solution compared to fishplated joints.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,513
Location
DTOS A or B

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,513
Location
DTOS A or B

As a total layman: why would a track be welded at all versus just replacing a piece of track?
If you cross reference the milage with the picture @yorkie posted on page one (the signalling panel).
Would that make the point of derailment between the tunnel exit and the facing crossover. The tunnel has the milage above it.

Also i never noticed in the aforementioned picture, how much of the line is in red showing the line occupied, all the way back to the tunnel and out the other side.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,555
Gareth is not guessing - he has considered the available video evidence and presented a realistic hypothesis. He may not be on the ground or part of any official investigation but his hypothesis appears to be credible.

I expect that the final official investigation will not vary by much.
I agree with @DerekC. There's an additional point, though. He has a hypothesis. That means something that falls short of a theory, and a theory falls short of being a fact. "I believe X happened because of A, B and C" is very different from "X happened because of A, B, and C". As a professional engineer, he should know that.
 

chrisjo

Member
Joined
18 May 2024
Messages
604
Location
Llanishen
'The failure of a track weld at kilometer 318.7, specifically on track L-10717 number 23117 as it passes through Adamuz (Córdoba), is the cause of the derailment of the Iryo 6189 train, as confirmed by investigators, ABC has learned'

The ABC report then goes on to say that the break was caused by something wrong on the underside of car #6 of the Iryo train, so we're back into the world of unsubstantiated speculation AGAIN.
 

Angmering1974

On Moderation
Joined
26 Jun 2023
Messages
162
Location
UK
'The failure of a track weld at kilometer 318.7, specifically on track L-10717 number 23117 as it passes through Adamuz (Córdoba), is the cause of the derailment of the Iryo 6189 train, as confirmed by investigators, ABC has learned'

The ABC report then goes on to say that the break was caused by something wrong on the underside of car #6 of the Iryo train, so we're back into the world of unsubstantiated speculation AGAIN.
You're right to point this out. But you say "was caused by". Is that confirmed or speculation? The article is paywalled for me now
 

lfc84

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
189
The ABC website link above has one paragraph which translates as follows:

Initial on-site investigations and passenger testimonies suggest that the derailment may have been caused by a weight being pulled by carriage 6 of the Iryo train. Witnesses traveling in that carriage (the one that derailed, pulling carriages 7 and 8 along with it) reported feeling strange disturbances in the carriage shortly before the accident. For this reason, it is believed that the train was pulling an extra weight (attached to the underside of the carriage) which, upon contact with the track, caused it to break and derail.
 

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,831
Location
West is best
'The failure of a track weld at kilometer 318.7, specifically on track L-10717 number 23117 as it passes through Adamuz (Córdoba), is the cause of the derailment of the Iryo 6189 train, as confirmed by investigators, ABC has learned'

The ABC report then goes on to say that the break was caused by something wrong on the underside of car #6 of the Iryo train, so we're back into the world of unsubstantiated speculation AGAIN.
You have to be careful drawing conclusions from these initial reports. The rail (weld) may have failed, then a further failure of the rail may have occurred.

A typical failure of a rail (as in break due to a stress defect) normally does not result in a derailment if the resulting gap between the different broken rails is small. Which if the rail has been stressed correctly should be the case (all the broken rails of this type that I have seen have had gaps of 10mm or less).

However, if the sleepers are not well packed or not in good condition, or if the break occurs near a existing weld, or there are cracks or other defects in the rail, there is a possibility that the hammering caused by a fast or heavy train passing over the defect will cause another break. This increases the likelihood of a derailment. How much depends on how big the overall gap is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top