• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

West Yorkshire bus franchising

Whisky Papa

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
744
Wasn't that was long after Rider when the national numbers came in circa 2003/4? First being First not only did it piecemeal but most internal systems weren't setup to take them, so fuel and in some places radios had to keep "local I.Ds" for a couple of years. I always thought it was just a kneejerk come vanity project because Stagecoach had done it but it was done just totally the wrong way!

I quit First Calderline in the spring of 2003 and there had been no mention of renumbering from the Metro-derived numbering system at that point. I guess it must have been a little while later I recall seeing the existing fleet with new five digit numbers, before the local routes went low-floor with a new fleet.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Leyland Bus

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2021
Messages
1,226
Location
York
I quit First Calderline in the spring of 2003 and there had been no mention of renumbering from the Metro-derived numbering system at that point. I guess it must have been a little while later I recall seeing the existing fleet with new five digit numbers, before the local routes went low-floor with a new fleet.
It was done fleet by fleet, so quite slowly. I started with First Manchester in Jan '05 and they had 5 digits by then, you must have left just before. Infact, it led to some oddities. First PMT was IIRC the first fleet done. They had some ex GM Olympians which were renumbered. They were then sent back to Manchester, who gave them their original 4 digit numbers back and then had to give them their "original" 5 digit numbers back thus making them out of sequence with their siblings!! Totally mad!

I remember First Huddersfield Atlanteans getting 5 digit numbers but forget when they finally came off as 30999 ANA 557Y & 30998 A737 NNA went on loan to Leeds after they were withdrawn by Huddersfield...
 
Last edited:

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
23,010
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
It was done fleet by fleet, so quitr slowly. I started with First Manchester in Jan '05 and they had 5 digits by then. Infact, it led to some oddities. First PMT was IIRC the first fleet done. They had some ex GM Olympians which were renumbered. They were then sent back to Manchester, who gave them their original numbers back and then had to give them their "original" 5 digit numbers back thus making them out of sequence with their siblings!! Totally mad!

I remember First Huddersfield Atlanteans getting 5 digit numbers but forget when they finally came off...
It was about 2002 to 2003 and yes, you're right that PMT and Manchester were the ones treated first. One oddity is that Solos were numbered in the midi series 4**** initially. However, as the role out continued, later adoptees such as West Yorkshire numbered them in the 5**** mini series.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,627
Location
Isle of Man
Yeah... who'd have thought that George Osborne, the Conservative architect of austerity, would enact a policy of reregulation and away from market forces. A Damascene conversion.... or something else?
The profit had been privatised, so it was time to nationalise the losses.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

return it back to how it was
It was working so well before. That’s why there was widespread opposition to the franchising regime.

Oh, wait…
 

SCH117X

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2015
Messages
2,001
Franchising is here to stay for some time. York & North Yorkshire is to pilot franchising rural bus services which could spell a interesting time for one operator as the biggest gripe of rural parish councils is even if they do have a service to some reasonable extent is the lack of an evening service.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
23,010
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
The profit had been privatised, so it was time to nationalise the losses.
This was 2015 and wasn't the issue was that Stagecoach were making too much money?

My suspicion was it was a way of pushing the responsibility and the liability for it to local government - no BSOG, no ENCTS funding, all pushed to local taxpayers. Then something happened in 2016.... and George was gone.

Franchising is here to stay for some time. York & North Yorkshire is to pilot franchising rural bus services which could spell a interesting time for one operator as the biggest gripe of rural parish councils is even if they do have a service to some reasonable extent is the lack of an evening service.
Ah yes - if only there was an evening service then we'd use it...
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
23,010
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Theres been a 2055 24 from Harrogate to Pateley Bridge, 2155 return, for some time now on Fridays and Saturdays so an equivalent could work on other rural routes
It really does depend when and where. They were introduced on the X93 and succeeded yet evening services on the 34 from Richmond to Darlington didn't. Nor did they up Swaledale and that too was only on a Friday and Saturday.
 

Ballyheigue

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2025
Messages
348
Location
Leeds
It really does depend when and where. They were introduced on the X93 and succeeded yet evening services on the 34 from Richmond to Darlington didn't. Nor did they up Swaledale and that too was only on a Friday and Saturday.
Well no surprise there, a night out in Darlington, or a night out in Harrogate, Scarborough or Whitby, I know which of the four will be the most appealing lol. Swaledale services I am surprised at however given Richmond ain't too bad for it's pubs.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,762
Location
Yorkshire
It was working so well before. That’s why there was widespread opposition to the franchising regime.

Oh, wait…
I can't see public opinion changing by 2028, no matter what improvements or worsening we see. If things have got worse (which would surprise me) then it might affect the 2032 election.
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
3,425
Location
York
The Weaver Network won't have been fully rolled out by May 2028 anyway. Areas like Calderdale will still be under the current system until Autumn of that year under current time frames. So the public won't have a proper opinion on the full network at the time of the election. By 2032, the public will have had 4 years to experience the network and any changes brought about by it to shape a positive or negative opinion towards the network which could influence their vote in 2032.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
4,601
I can't see public opinion changing by 2028, no matter what improvements or worsening we see. If things have got worse (which would surprise me) then it might affect the 2032 election.
I don’t think things will get worse but people are expecting things to get better that isn’t under the mayor’s control

People say the buses are ‘always late’ blaming the operator for not arriving on time - will franchising reduce the traffic delays?
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
3,425
Location
York
I don’t think things will get worse but people are expecting things to get better that isn’t under the mayor’s control

People say the buses are ‘always late’ blaming the operator for not arriving on time - will franchising reduce the traffic delays?
I think this is a very important point. The public are expecting (and have been told) that buses will get better thanks to franchising. If they don't, the public will see it as a failure. Buses getting worse and buses not seeing any sort of improvements will both be branded as a failing of Weaver Network by the general public. 2028 is too soon with the network not being fully rolled out across West Yorkshire but by 2032, the public will be expecting to see improvements to buses.
 

mattb7tl

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
265
Location
Huddersfield
I think this is a very important point. The public are expecting (and have been told) that buses will get better thanks to franchising. If they don't, the public will see it as a failure. Buses getting worse and buses not seeing any sort of improvements will both be branded as a failing of Weaver Network by the general public. 2028 is too soon with the network not being fully rolled out across West Yorkshire but by 2032, the public will be expecting to see improvements to buses.
The public are more reasonable than you think they are not magically expecting buses to run on time. Manchester subreddit is an example of how the general public react to franchising not many have any negative comments to say and when you do find a negative comment it tends to be from an enthusiast.

 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
3,425
Location
York
The public are more reasonable than you think they are not magically expecting buses to run on time. Manchester subreddit is an example of how the general public react to franchising not many have any negative comments to say and when you do find a negative comment it tends to be from an enthusiast.

It doesn't have to be buses running on time. It can be improvements to the vehicles themselves, improvements to frequency, etc. Any improvement that Brabin has said will come about as a result of franchising.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
4,601
It’s the same with rail nationalisation, when anyone such as a news programme asks anyone in the street the main thing they will say is ‘they are never on time’ and they blame the operator for 100% of delays
 

SCH117X

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2015
Messages
2,001
A simple improvement will be sensible timetabling rather than either ignoring congestion or overly padding out the timetable
 

Top