• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SWT 158 & 159 Refurbishments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I was going to say the same, the newer one looks nicer, the toothed thing looks sort of a bit unfriendly.

It'd work if it was a smooth fade rather than the "teeth" though.
 

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,822
Location
Clydebank
If I may be slightly controversial, I like the 'Zig-Zag' livery. I'll coincide that the 'teeth' may be a bit unfriendly and brash (a fade effect would have also worked), but I think the overall concept works.
 

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,932
Location
Gateway to the South West
Not bad, but as 'ml' says, why tinker? Above the passenger windows, though, I think it looks like the masking tape slipped! That's a problem with trying to cross a continuous pattern 'under' a thick bold stripe.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
That is far superior to the awful 'teeth', which just looks brash and nasty and resembles a packet of crisps or chewing gum.

However this new version still has the problem that the blue skirt stops short of the curve in the bodyside, which is a very poor alteration to the existing livery. Having seen the 'teeth' effort in the flesh, the whole train looks 'wrong' because the blue band stops awkwardly short of where it should naturally sit, which spoils the proportions of the livery. Ray Stenning, who I believe designed the current livery (is there anything with a livery that he hasn't designed?), has been quoted as suggesting that the main consideration with any colour scheme is that it sits naturally on the shape of the vehicle; it should work with it, not clash against it. If he's done this redesign then he's ignored his own rules, and demonstrated why they're important!

Pedantic fusspot mode now to 'OFF'!
 
Last edited:

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,290
That is far superior to the awful 'teeth', which just looks brash and nasty and resembles a packet of crisps or chewing gum.

However this new version still has the problem that the blue skirt stops short of the curve in the bodyside, which is a very poor alteration to the existing livery. Having seen the 'teeth' effort in the flesh, the whole train looks 'wrong' because the blue band stops awkwardly short of where it should naturally sit, which spoils the proportions of the livery. Ray Stenning, who I believe designed the current livery (is there anything with a livery that he hasn't designed?), has been quoted as suggesting that the main consideration with any colour scheme is that it sits naturally on the shape of the vehicle; it should work with it, not clash against it. If he's done this redesign then he's ignored his own rules, and demonstrated why they're important!

Pedantic fusspot mode now to 'OFF'!

I guess you're not a fan of the EMT 158s then?
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
I prefer the old livery, btw, didn't the end doors used to be orange? Was it deemed to be not enough of a contrast with the main livery (DDA regs)?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,244
I prefer the old livery, btw, didn't the end doors used to be orange? Was it deemed to be not enough of a contrast with the main livery (DDA regs)?

The orange doors were already there as contrast. Back in 2006 or so, when that livery was first applied to 159/1s post overhaul to SWT standards, the inner doors and both sets of doors on the middle cars, were still done in the red. It was a later change to make them all orange throughout the length of the units.

The latest change from orange to yellow doesn't look as if it is an essential 'requirement', so perhaps they just think it looks better overall.
 

Townsend Hook

Member
Joined
3 Aug 2011
Messages
932
Location
GB
This latest effort does seem to be so complex as to look untidy. I much prefer the previous sawtooth design.
 

capital12

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2012
Messages
523
That is far superior to the awful 'teeth', which just looks brash and nasty and resembles a packet of crisps or chewing gum.

However this new version still has the problem that the blue skirt stops short of the curve in the bodyside, which is a very poor alteration to the existing livery. Having seen the 'teeth' effort in the flesh, the whole train looks 'wrong' because the blue band stops awkwardly short of where it should naturally sit, which spoils the proportions of the livery. Ray Stenning, who I believe designed the current livery (is there anything with a livery that he hasn't designed?), has been quoted as suggesting that the main consideration with any colour scheme is that it sits naturally on the shape of the vehicle; it should work with it, not clash against it. If he's done this redesign then he's ignored his own rules, and demonstrated why they're important!

Pedantic fusspot mode now to 'OFF'!

Yes agree totally about the blue skirt. The subsequent increase in white coupled with the yellow doors also makes it look odd.

And yes Ray did the original but he hasn't done these updates.
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Apart from the colour of the doors, why can't they make it exactly like it is on the 444s?
 

Harbon 1

Member
Joined
30 Apr 2011
Messages
1,020
Location
Burton on Trent
Apart from the colour of the doors, why can't they make it exactly like it is on the 444s?

I assume you mean the black roof? If so I guess being diesel it'll get dirty pretty quickly.

Also the 444s and all Desiros for that matter have always looked 'chubby' to me.

(apologies for bump, didn't see the date, was redirected here from another thread and thought I'd rudely butt in)
 
Last edited:

Helvellyn

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2009
Messages
2,568
I think 159101 looks fresh. Better than 159103, and when you see it against a unit that hasn't been to Loughborough yet it looks brighter. The units coming back now are also getting First Class seats the same as fitted to the 159/0 units - my guess is they are ex-GWR ones from the Trailer Firsts. The 159/1s got their First Class seats from Anglia 170/2s, and in my view just are not as comfortable.
 

Harbon 1

Member
Joined
30 Apr 2011
Messages
1,020
Location
Burton on Trent
So I haven't just pulled the thread off topic, I think the livery looks fresh, and a nice change to an already quite attractive livery IMO. :) much better than the zigzags, that looks like something Virgin would do! :lol:
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,730
Location
West of Andover
I see 159107 is back with the new seat cushions etc, does anybody know which 159 has been sent up to Loughborough next to be done?

(And when did the 158s get the new sink module fitted with a better handdryer?)
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,304
Location
Yorks
Does anyone know what these new seat cushions are like ?

I hope SWT haven't taken a currently superior interior design and replaced it with the usual rock hard rubbish of current train refurbs.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,226
They divide opinion, some people like them, some people don't.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,304
Location
Yorks
They divide opinion, some people like them, some people don't.

So I'm guessing they are significantly harder than the older ones.

I knew my comfortable journeys to Exeter were too good to last.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,226
They're not significantly harder. They are firmer, but I still find them very comfortable.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,730
Location
West of Andover
I call them memory foam as that is what the base felt like when first introduced (but having 103 a couple weeks ago they felt less firm so maybe they take time to wear in)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top