xotGD
Established Member
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2017
- Messages
- 7,818
USA and Mexico
Wrong Continent!USA and Mexico
Indeed it was. The railway ran from Liege to Cologne via Aachen (which by then was in the German Confederation).Belgium, and whatever German state or statelet it may have been in 1843?
I don't altogether feel that I deserve the honour -- became a matter of thinking up "possibles" one by one (as with me and Belgium-and-whatever); statistically, in the end someone would happen to be right...Indeed it was. The railway ran from Liege to Cologne via Aachen (which by then was in the German Confederation).
Please be so kind and set the next question.
OK. The obvious(?) one is metre.I don't altogether feel that I deserve the honour -- became a matter of thinking up "possibles" one by one (as with me and Belgium-and-whatever); statistically, in the end someone would happen to be right...
However; and as Belgium has "come into the frame" -- I like stuff about rail gauges. Question concerns Belgium's at one time very extensive country-wide light railways (Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Vicinaux / Nationale Maatschappij voor Buurtspoorwegen), complementing the State "real" rail system -- only a very small proportion of the one-time light-rail kilometrage, is still in any way active today. These lines, usually known for brevity as the "Vicinaux": were originally on three different gauges. The overwhelming majority, were on gauge 1; a few here and there, were on gauge 2; and long ago, some in a particular corner of the country were on gauge 3 -- these converted to gauge 1, long ago. Please identify the respective gauges.
It was answered about an hour ago! Belgium and Germany.Germany & Switzerland?
Yes, Sorry....my phone is doing its usual trick of not showing the latest batch of posts for a short time after I reach a thread. Post deleted.was answered about an hour ago! Belgium and Germany.![]()
You're right. The great majority of these lines were indeed metre gauge (1). And many lines in Antwerp province were indeed originally 3' 6" (1067mm) (3) -- not British involvement as such; a lot of light railways in the Netherlands were built to 1067mm, including those just over the Dutch border from Antwerp province -- lines wherein, initially 1067mm to link with the Dutch lines. After much turmoil in the WWI German occupation of Belgium, these Antwerp Prov. lines were rebuilt / converted to metre gauge. The odd section in a few places was -- you've got it right -- standard gauge (2); including a delightful line south of Liege, freight-only for its final few decades, but lasting thus until the mid-1960s, worked to the last by steam tram locos.OK. The obvious(?) one is metre.
I think the Antwerpen area may have been built by the British to 3 foot six inches.
I don't know the other one so will have a guess at standard gauge.
Not that one. The Brill line was taken over by the Metropolitan, as I recall, and didn't have a wooden plateway precursor. A bit further north and quite a way east.Quainton Road - Brill ?
Not that one either - I don't think it started life as a road, and the trams ran on cast iron (rather than wood) plate rails.Stratford & Moreton Tramway, northern bit thereof? -- originally in toto, Moreton-in-Marsh to Stratford-on-Avon: northern part, as per your scenario, @DerekC; southern part became the -- in comparison fairly conventional -- Moreton-in-Marsh to Shipston-on-Stour branch, which I think lasted into the 1950s.
ETA: coaches built at Doncaster (which I'd failed hitherto, to notice) -- not likely, I feel, for Gloucestershire / Warwickshire and definitely GWR territory; but I have no better alternative ideas... and, "further north / quite a way east" -- memo to self, "pay attention, that boy !"
virgin?
Sorry, wrong.2-tone?
Stiff?
Those were two different railways ! Which one do you mean ?Pike Bros & Fayle?