northwichcat
Veteran Member
Capital letters in names of organisations and companies are very important.
Even though a large number don't use them? It's also not a recent thing - the Co-op have been using a lower case c in their logo since 1968.
Capital letters in names of organisations and companies are very important.
Regarding the logos and the name of the operator on the side of the train, when I was at primary school many moons ago, I was taught that for names of organisations/companies, etc should always begin with a capital letter.
It looks very lazy and sloppy with the current design.
PS For those who are wondering if capital letters really do matter, here is something I stumbled upon online a few years ago (I cannot find the link). The exact same sentence, one with capital letters regarding names, and one without.
1) "Tom helped his Uncle Jack off a horse"
2) "Tom helped his uncle jack off a horse"
The second sentence without capital letters gives a totally different meaning.
Capital letters in names of organisations and companies are very important.
is there a problem with that? because if you are worried about the lake of a capital letter, I suggest you would also have a problem with the lack of an apostrophe and the lack of a space.mikesphotos
Finally, take a look at the photographers logo in the above pictures. is there a problem with that? because if you are worried about the lake of a capital letter, I suggest you would also have a problem with the lack of an apostrophe and the lack of a space.
150134 is the next one to go to Crewe for some sort of refurb work with 140 returning
You would think that after 20 plus years or so.some one would have come up with a solution to the 158's unreliable air con.I just had a ride on 158754. Quite impressed, apart from the dirty carpet and the aircon not working. At least the PIS display was static, not scrolling unnecessarily!
You would think that after 20 plus years or so.some one would have come up with a solution to the 158's unreliable air con.
If the necessary skills no longer exist here how about trying overseas.
K
From my memory of a previous thread, there are no easy solutions to 158 aircon unreliability. A cause of many failures is the requirement for a lengthy "pump down" procedure before the engines are shut down - this is not always operationally practical.
It would be hard to justify the cost of retrofitting a modern system to 25 year old trains. There is always the option of opening the hopper windows!
150140 confirmed in new livery. Was on Newton Heath TMD this morning.
By chance I had a trip on the sole refurbished 155 yesterday - short verdict from me is that it's an improvement, still fairly obvious that it's an old train though.
I had a run out in it myself, my first experience of any refurbished Northern unit. I agree that it's a bit of an improvement- but I think it falls well short of the train being "as new"- the seat cushions are already breaking away from the frames!
I had a run out in it myself, my first experience of any refurbished Northern unit. I agree that it's a bit of an improvement- but I think it falls well short of the train being "as new"- the seat cushions are already breaking away from the frames!
From my memory of a previous thread, there are no easy solutions to 158 aircon unreliability. A cause of many failures is the requirement for a lengthy "pump down" procedure before the engines are shut down - this is not always operationally practical.
It would be hard to justify the cost of retrofitting a modern system to 25 year old trains. There is always the option of opening the hopper windows!
Originally Posted by Greybeard33
From my memory of a previous thread, there are no easy solutions to 158 aircon unreliability. A cause of many failures is the requirement for a lengthy "pump down" procedure before the engines are shut down - this is not always operationally practical.
It would be hard to justify the cost of retrofitting a modern system to 25 year old trains. There is always the option of opening the hopper windows!
Though I have absolutely no idea when it comes to cost, class 158's could quite easily feel like a modern train if it had functioning air conditioning. They're less noisy than the 156's as well.
It would be hard to justify the cost of retrofitting a modern system to 25 year old trains.
[1] I've never been entirely sure what the difference is - they are refrigerant-based, not evaporative coolers, which is what I thought the difference was but clearly not.
You should read Modern Railways (Issue 806 - November 2015) where Ian Walmsley asserts that the 158s are potentially Britain's best-ever DMUs. I couldn't agree more, they're terrific trains.
It really wouldn't. They have well over 10 years more life left in them. Consider that Chiltern retrofitted air cooling[1] to the 165s which are of similar vintage.
It may well be possible to keep the 158s in service for another 10 years or more, but that does not mean that they will all necessarily remain in service that long. EMUs of a similar age are already being withdrawn.
I agree with the point about the Orange LED destination blinds. They're truly woeful.
They flicker constantly and the text is too small in size and in definition. Also, they don't scroll, so longer destinations get abbreviated e.g. Manchester OR or Liverpool SP.
I honestly believe that the traditional roller blinds were easier to read from a distance. The type of display fitted to Merseyrail 507s/508s would have been far better.
The company installing the new electronic blinds and interior PIDs are called TrainFX. Supposedly Scotrail and Northern both use the same basic system how ever Northern went for a cheaper option. Ie No scrolling messages, no Scrolling PIDs or Destination screens, ohhh no no if you want that you have to pay MOAR money![]()