• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

HS2 Euston - Development, design and construction news (not speculation, please)

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,252
It won't. Cutting back to 6 platforms allows some of the land to be used for housing and over-site developement.
Rishi's Manchester hotel room cut back planning team were unaware there are protected sight lines from Primrose Hill and Parliament Hill (and other locations as well that don't affect HS2 at Euston) to Parliament and St Pauls. This limits wat can and can't be done with land at Euston and the far west side of the site that the team were salivating over is very problematic for tall buildings hence a 10/11 track HS2 station with over track development actually produces more building square footage when you take into account sight lines...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Geogregor

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2016
Messages
457
Location
London
Rishi's Manchester hotel room cut back planning team were unaware there are protected sight lines from Primrose Hill and Parliament Hill (and other locations as well that don't affect HS2 at Euston) to Parliament and St Pauls. This limits wat can and can't be done with land at Euston and the far west side of the site that the team were salivating over is very problematic for tall buildings hence a 10/11 track HS2 station with over track development actually produces more building square footage when you take into account sight lines...

That is not surprising as most politicians have zero grasp of planning constrains, engineering constrains etc. Most of them studied humanities.

If for a monument we discount political anti-rail views of Sunak and his team there are too few folks around government who have any sort of technical background.
 

Tezza1978

Member
Joined
22 May 2020
Messages
312
Location
Warrington
Rishi's Manchester hotel room cut back planning team were unaware there are protected sight lines from Primrose Hill and Parliament Hill (and other locations as well that don't affect HS2 at Euston) to Parliament and St Pauls. This limits wat can and can't be done with land at Euston and the far west side of the site that the team were salivating over is very problematic for tall buildings hence a 10/11 track HS2 station with over track development actually produces more building square footage when you take into account sight lines...
I knew about the sightline issue from previous posts on here, but didn't realise that meant there can actually be more development on top if the 10/11 track version is built.

If the govt had any brains then surely the larger "box" will then be built with passive provision for the extra platforms at least. It may not be up to them anyway given the election is < 6 months away - as any "plan" they have can be amended by the next govt before work starts on the station build
 

Fazaar1889

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2022
Messages
629
Location
South East
The Rishi 6 platform version seems to be a short term bodge that can never be expanded, or if it is will cost 2-3 times what building the bigger shell in first place and not changing the design would have.
On the assumption that the 6 platform stations goes ahead and then later the rest of HS2 is built in full. How would they expand it? Would they just knockdown the housing they just built?

If anything, that just seems to me like rishi is saying "haha look at me, I care about you guys! I'm building housing! See!" while contributing almost nothing to counteract the housing crisis.
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
4,508
Rishi's Manchester hotel room cut back planning team were unaware there are protected sight lines from Primrose Hill and Parliament Hill (and other locations as well that don't affect HS2 at Euston) to Parliament and St Pauls. This limits wat can and can't be done with land at Euston and the far west side of the site that the team were salivating over is very problematic for tall buildings hence a 10/11 track HS2 station with over track development actually produces more building square footage when you take into account sight lines...
More square footage than what? Is this assuming that the space at low level, that would be occupied by the platforms, could not be used for anything else?
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,252
More square footage than what? Is this assuming that the space at low level, that would be occupied by the platforms, could not be used for anything else?
No the aim was to have small footprint station leaving more land clear for other development unfortunately unbeknownst to Rishi's hotel room team those potentially "clear" areas can't have very tall buildings, hence tall buildings are needed to maximise overall development floor space (which they they are when sightlines are included) then you have to have you have to have tall building over the new HS2 station further east if possible where the top of the building can be much taller.
The problem is that this is expensive and Camden council viewed all this extra cost for over station development as something that meant they should get more S.106 benefit from based on % value of overall non rail exclusive development where as everyone else view was that Camden should get less because of the restrictive planning conditions.

In reality Rishi didn't get any real vote bounce out of it and Euston tunnelling isn't meant to start till summer 2025 so not much cost impact now (cheaper than cancelling for short term cashflow which is mostly what they care about at the moment).
Euston tunnelling should start shortly after the eastbound TBMs from Northholt complete their work.
 

chris2

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2023
Messages
204
Location
Southampton
This limits wat can and can't be done with land at Euston and the far west side of the site that the team were salivating over is very problematic for tall buildings

those potentially "clear" areas can't have very tall buildings, hence tall buildings are needed to maximise overall development floor space (which they they are when sightlines are included) then you have to have you have to have tall building over the new HS2 station further east if possible where the top of the building can be much taller.

So if you can’t really develop the land why would they not put the new station there?

Surely the only alternative to this is knocking more of the existing Euston down? Won’t that trash the capacity and bring even more disruption and delay? Not to mention be an awful kick in the teeth for anyone who lost their home for a station that never got built and became someone else’s home instead??
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,252
So if you can’t really develop the land why would they not put the new station there?
Much easier for the next government to come to that conclusion, but then Kier is the local MP which also causes many complications... (more than when Boris's dad lived locally.)
awful kick in the teeth for anyone who lost their home for a station that never got built and became someone else’s home instead??
Rishi hotel room team were also severely lacking in knowledge of compulsory purchase legalisation - there will be legal action if Rishi's plans get much further
 

poffle

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2023
Messages
239
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I think a lot of the issues with Euston is with the HS2 station being a standalone project whereas there actually needs to be an integrated plan for the HS2 and Network Rail station. And the potential Crossrail 2.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,252
I think a lot of the issues with Euston is with the HS2 station being a standalone project whereas there actually needs to be an integrated plan for the HS2 and Network Rail station. And the potential Crossrail 2.
Bingo!
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,087
Location
West Wiltshire
So.. what happens now? Is it still with Rishi or is it going back to HS2?
Sort of stuck in the middle at the moment

HS2 can do token amount of work, ticking over during the 2 year construction pause, but without finance can't really go any further. The Government controls the finance.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,904
Location
Mold, Clwyd
So.. what happens now? Is it still with Rishi or is it going back to HS2?
It's very definitely with Rishi and his advisors, together with the consortium they put together to redesign (and fund) Euston.
But is does look like the approach tunnels from OOC (still with HS2 Ltd) will be completed, so HS2 will reach Euston somehow.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,087
Location
West Wiltshire

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,005
Location
Surrey
Info on Euston from TfL Board papers (for meeting 26 June)

section 5.1.2 (a) Old Oak Common now expected to be temporary HS2 terminus for around 10 years

section 5.1.2 (c) Government expecting 10,000 new homes as part of Euston development

section 5.1.2 (d) looking at reducing costs at Euston in relation to interchanges

If its going to be ten years before Euston is complete that makes in 2040 much point bothering with the terminus. What a mess the Torys have made of this.
 

jfowkes

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
1,268
If its going to be ten years before Euston is complete that makes in 2040 much point bothering with the terminus. What a mess the Torys have made of this.
Waterloo was the terminus for Eurostar for 13 years before HS1 and St Pancras came along. Yeah it sucks that HS2 has been extremely badly mishandled by the government, but looking long term there's still a possibility of a brighter, better future.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,005
Location
Surrey
Waterloo was the terminus for Eurostar for 13 years before HS1 and St Pancras came along. Yeah it sucks that HS2 has been extremely badly mishandled by the government, but looking long term there's still a possibility of a brighter, better future.
Waterloo was in central London mind you Elizabeth line will at least provide far more suitable connectivity for long distance travellers than the Northern or Bakerloo line did.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
What's happening now? I was under the impression that it was in a kind of limbo state?

The Tunnel Boring Machines are being delivered to Old Oak Common in the coming months before commencing tunneling towards Euston. So HS2 is planned to still go to Euston.
 

chris2

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2023
Messages
204
Location
Southampton
So in terms of activity this is what HS2 themselves say they are doing during the ‘pause’…

The activities that will continue in the Euston Approaches include:

  • The extension of Granby Terrace bridge
  • Building a retaining wall next to Regent’s Park estate to form the side of the future railway cutting
  • Utility diversions to clear Hampstead Road, ahead of works to extend the bridge
  • Preparing the foundations for the Cavern Headhouse and Concrete Box Surveys and any protective works required ahead of the tunnelling
  • The use of the Regent’s Park Vehicle Holding Area and the existing lorry lay-by north of Park Village East
  • Completing design work

The first of these - the bridge extension - can be quite easily seen in the video. The construction of the supports appears to show four parallel channels for tracks to run in underneath the future bridge deck.

Looking further ahead…
- TBMs will set off from OOC in due course. Funding is committed.
- a large cavern will be built in order to get the TBMs out when they get to Euston approaches.
- three spray-lined tunnels that fan out from the cavern are due to start in 2026 according to the look ahead doc linked above.
- this activity will shut Mornington St bridge until 2031, so presumably that means the spray-lined tunnels will take quite a while.

I’d say pretty liberal interpretation of a ‘pause’, in other words.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
2,614
Location
Crewe
I guess it's the Euston station 'site' that is paused, the enabling works for the throat and tunnel continues
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,087
Location
West Wiltshire
Construction Wave is reporting that the £450m contract for enabling works at Euston have been completed

Skanska, along with the supply chain, has completed a programme of enabling works at Euston station for Network Rail.

The works are in preparation for the arrival of the HS2 rail line, which is set to connect London to Birmingham.

The seven-year contract employed 200 people at its peak.

The station required significant changes to prepare for the new high speed rail terminus located next to the existing station where the planned HS2 route overlaps existing rail infrastructure.

Now that enabling works have enabled the station to remain operational throughout the HS2 construction works.

43 different multi-disciplinary projects took place around Euston station, including:

  • Strengthening and cladding the station building
  • Demolishing two platforms (30m x 300m)
  • Constructing a new maintenance delivery unit (MDU) on the parcel deck
  • Constructing a building to house new waste compactors
  • A new 11kv network including four high voltage substations to power the whole station
  • Extensive works in the basement and other significant works
3.25 million hours RIDDOR free were achieved on the project, as well as exceeding the targeted 15 per cent carbon reduction, with some packages more than 80 per cent.

 

Top