• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR to use Euston

Status
Not open for further replies.

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,661
We have done this before, the WCML has had plenty of disruption af Euston and will have plenty more when Handsacre is built. Im not sure what the engineering block has to do with them not liking IET seats or a train being cancelled. The seats are the seats and trains are cancelled every day.
Whilst seats are seats and cancellations do happen everyday for various reasons the railway needs listen to its customers and act on reasonable concerns as at the moment, I would suggest, it is failing to so.

I would suggest GWR need to look at extra options from Euston if possible or secondly could some services have been operated to Waterloo instead? Either IETs from Waterloo to Ealing Broadway via Kensington Olympia and SW Sidings, or perhaps IETs or Class 387s between Waterloo and Reading, and then onto GW destinations.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,630
Whilst seats are seats and cancellations do happen everyday for various reasons the railway needs listen to its customers and act on reasonable concerns as at the moment, I would suggest, it is failing to so.

I would suggest GWR need to look at extra options from Euston if possible or secondly could some services have been operated to Waterloo instead? Either IETs from Waterloo to Ealing Broadway via Kensington Olympia and SW Sidings, or perhaps IETs or Class 387s between Waterloo and Reading, and then onto GW destinations.
They did look at Waterloo and discounted it.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,897
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Sadly my neighbours had the opposite experience travelling from Euston on the 27th. Quite level headedly they have told me they will drive in future for their annual Plymouth to London christmas stay. I wonder how much business will be lost to the railway due to the descion to disrupt the Western for many years to come just to build OOC. For the record their main complaints were the train was cancelled and they had to wait 2 hours at Euston, oh , and as an elderly couple they can no longer cope with the uncomfortable seating on the GWR IETs. All such a shame, and potential income lost to the railway coffers. One has to question why it is acceptable to disrupt the Western for next 5 years minimum, when a main selling point for HS2 was not disrupting the WCML for a long period......
The only cancellation I noticed on the 27th was an IET from Penzance which didn't get past Plymouth (1Z82), and the return service at 1636 was cancelled from Euston (1Z89).
That didn't look like an issue with the engineering block or the diversion.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,506
Location
Plymouth
The only cancellation I noticed on the 27th was an IET from Penzance which didn't get past Plymouth (1Z82), and the return service at 1636 was cancelled from Euston (1Z89).
That didn't look like an issue with the engineering block or the diversion.
1636 I think was the train they where booked on so that would figure.
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,500
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
The only cancellation I noticed on the 27th was an IET from Penzance which didn't get past Plymouth (1Z82), and the return service at 1636 was cancelled from Euston (1Z89).

It's no consolation to those passengers affected by the cancellation but the service on 27th, over a convoluted route, otherwise seemed to operate well.
 

Tilting007

Member
Joined
21 Oct 2024
Messages
258
Location
Rugby
The only cancellation I noticed on the 27th was an IET from Penzance which didn't get past Plymouth (1Z82), and the return service at 1636 was cancelled from Euston (1Z89).
That didn't look like an issue with the engineering block or the diversion.
This was a unit fault that caused this.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,897
Location
Mold, Clwyd
This was a unit fault that caused this.
You'd have hoped that GWR/Agility could have found a replacement unit given several hours notice of the failure at Plymouth.
But an hourly through service from Plymouth and Swansea to London Euston was an impressive plan.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,630
I'm making the point that all the pain being lumped on GWR passengers at present , whether it be the seating, or now the addition of a railway that will be barely usable during holiday periods, is going to lead to lost custom and disruption for very little benefit (to those from south Wales and the south west).
You were saying that the WCML isnt disrupted due to HS2 works.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,506
Location
Plymouth
You were saying that the WCML isnt disrupted due to HS2 works.
I'm saying that the WCML should take the majority of the hit as it's the WCML that will "benefit" from HS2. Most of the Western will not, as services will be slowed down to call at OOC, and whilst that may be a little useful to the eastern end, it will be pretty pointless for the south west and south wales. Yet under the current plan, we have massive disruption to the Western for years to come for very little benefit, indeed journeys will be slowed down in the long term.
 
Joined
26 Jun 2019
Messages
210
If enough capacity at Euston could be found for the 2-hourly semi fast services to the south west then I can’t see how the situation is any different to a normal day for South west passengers. Those to/from Cornwall had the same level of service. Except ending up in a different part of London (most will transfer to the tube anyway)

The most disadvantaged were those starting or changing at Reading as the Euston services were not advertised stops. So only the semi fast services could be used. This, in my opinion, is unacceptable and more likely to put people off travelling.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,630
I'm saying that the WCML should take the majority of the hit as it's the WCML that will "benefit" from HS2. Most of the Western will not, as services will be slowed down to call at OOC, and whilst that may be a little useful to the eastern end, it will be pretty pointless for the south west and south wales. Yet under the current plan, we have massive disruption to the Western for years to come for very little benefit, indeed journeys will be slowed down in the long term.
It is/has taking the majority of the hit.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,630
Other than platform closures at Euston and any knock-on disruption caused by diverted GWR services, what is the impact of HS2 works on the WCML on a week-by-week basis?
The same as OOC, little apart from the blocks, but its disingenuous to suggest the WCML isnt impacted and won't be.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,611
Location
Burgess Hill
its disingenuous to suggest the WCML isnt impacted and won't be.
I mean, you said it is taking and has taken the majority of the hit. I think it's relatively safe to say that, at the moment, it has been affected rather little.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,897
Location
Mold, Clwyd
I mean, you said it is taking and has taken the majority of the hit. I think it's relatively safe to say that, at the moment, it has been affected rather little.
WCML disruption started I think in 2017 when the first enabling works started at Euston to reduce the footprint of the classic station and approaches for HS2.
The Trent Valley section was disrupted when the HS2 route tunnelled underneath it south of Lichfield.
I think the Birmingham line will be impacted where HS2 crosses the WCML at Berkswell, and the junction at Handsacre will be disruptive when construction starts.
The GW route (not just the GWR TOC) and Elizabeth Line will benefit hugely from the completed OOC station, and disruption will be limited to the specific short-term construction blocks.
Separately from HS2 connections, the stop at OOC will also enable better interchange between GW and EL services, and relieve crowding at Paddington.
Major works were planned at Crewe for HS2 Phase 2a, but these are now in abeyance (though the enabling resignalling programme started this Christmas).
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,630
I mean, you said it is taking and has taken the majority of the hit. I think it's relatively safe to say that, at the moment, it has been affected rather little.
LNW-GW above has described it well. Half station blocks reduces the services out of Euston. Trent Valley does the same. Berkswell (now finished) meant reduced or no West Mids services. Crewe Independent Line resignalling over the last week shows the level of disruption 2A would have caused. Its not been shouted about as most HS2 work was taken alongside NR renewals, much like OOC will do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top