REVUpminster
Established Member
ScotRail want to get rid of the HSTs due to criticism of their crashworthiness. GWR want to do the same and with 221s becoming available and Laira know them, the HSTs days are numbered.
It's warranty work. Trailers spending a few months in service only to have water pouring in through the roofs and rust streaks down the sides.So they should be able to get 13 into traffic now, rising to 14 once the Wabtec work is complete. It's not clear why Wabtec need to do corrosion repair now: that should have been done when they got the sliding doors, so either it wasn't in the scope (GWR screw up) or it's warranty work (Wabtec screw up).
Laira's 'excuse' is that it's battling to put trains which are past their sell-by date onto diagrams they're simply not designed for.Somebody is paying for this largesse, and it ain't GWR.
Certainly the ScotRail fleet is well below the originally planned utilisation. Both have mitigating circumstances where either the TOC has not had the fleet for that long (ScotRail) or they are not long transferred to a different depot (LNER sets to Neville Hill). What's Laira's excuse?
Crashworthiness is not why GWR wish to get rid of their sets - the eye-watering cost of running them is the principal reason.ScotRail want to get rid of the HSTs due to criticism of their crashworthiness. GWR want to do the same and with 221s becoming available and Laira know them, the HSTs days are numbered.
Not only as outlined above, but using 221s on the services currently operated by HSTs would be utter madness. They’re full thirsty at the best of times.ScotRail want to get rid of the HSTs due to criticism of their crashworthiness. GWR want to do the same and with 221s becoming available and Laira know them, the HSTs days are numbered.
Yes I would agree with that fact. I don't think 150s are all that bad in general.150's will be around for some time yet, particularly in Cornwall.
5 car units will not fit in clear of the platform starter signal at the bay platform at St Erth. The recent extension means that a 4 car (2x2) class 150 is now fully platformed whereas the St Ives end crew door was not previously.
Simply not true, a 4 car 150 fitted easily before with much room to spare, as I'd said up thread, I worked on the St Ives branch with a 5 car in 2004 and it fitted fine at St Erth in the bay.5 car units will not fit in clear of the platform starter signal at the bay platform at St Erth. The recent extension means that a 4 car (2x2) class 150 is now fully platformed whereas the St Ives end crew door was not previously.
www.railadvent.co.uk
It’s the NR press release from last Monday copied word for word, so it’s going to be as true as any NR statement…According to an Article by Rail Advent they seem to think that St Ives will see 5 cars from May does that mean we will see these 150/9s then? Not sure how true this is but would be good to see the extra capacity so soon.
![]()
An extra 2,000 seats per day for the St. Ives branch line
An extra 2,000 seats per day for the St. Ives branch line will benefit passengers as part of a number of improvements in Cornwall.www.railadvent.co.uk