The_Train
Established Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2018
- Messages
- 5,247
Playing a bit of catch up on this - is that the first and only unit to have made the move so far?377121 has now moved to Southeastern.
Playing a bit of catch up on this - is that the first and only unit to have made the move so far?377121 has now moved to Southeastern.
377 122 has also moved over, I think.Playing a bit of catch up on this - is that the first and only unit to have made the move so far?
Don't suppose you know when, Peter?377 122 has also moved over, I think.
Someone reported upthread seeing it on 30th November - now that's a Saturday, so I think it may have actually moved overnight on the night of the 29th.Don't suppose you know when, Peter?
Someone reported upthread seeing it on 30th November - now that's a Saturday, so I think it may have actually moved overnight on the night of the 29th.
Thank you both377122 moved on Saturday 30th November.
5Y43 11:35 Selhurst Depot to Victoria
5K77 12:37 Victoria to Ramsgate Depot

That makes sense, any idea of the diagrams for them?387/2 will be GX
the 387/1 & /3s will be SN
This is purely a guess but in theory they should takeover the GX east coast way diagrams and maybe the peak runs to and from London Bridge from the coast. If they’re based between Stewart’s Lane and Lovers walk I guess they can end up on any of those depot based diagrams though.That makes sense, any idea of the diagrams for them?
Does that mean we’ll see more 12-car peak GX services soon?387/2 will be GX
the 387/1 & /3s will be SN
Thanks for this. Do you know if there were any photos put up anywhere? I’d love to see.387128 and 387129 entered service with Southern on this monrings 1J92 0702 Bognor Regis - London Bridge via Littlehampton.
Southern Electric group on facebook has oneThanks for this. Do you know if there were any photos put up anywhere? I’d love to see.
I can only see the GWR liveried one thereSouthern Electric group on facebook has one
They're more ideal than the 3+2 seating which occupies a majority of 377s. Plus with the airline seats, there are more seats overall which provides more chance of getting a seat. That's significantly more ideal for a longish journey.
There were a couple on The Official Electrostar Appreciation Group on Facebook.Thanks for this. Do you know if there were any photos put up anywhere? I’d love to see.
Yes, I've seen photos of 128 and 129 in service over the past couple of days.I am not sure whether this relates to the introduction of class 379 on Great Northern and partial replacement of the 387s, but I noticed what appeared to have been a Great Northern Class 387 on Southern today, operating Brighton to Southampton services, which I believe was 387128, which is unsual because its usually Gatwick Express Class 387/2s which operate the route. Does anyone know if that has been one of the first to be offically transferred to Southern?
The big difference between the two is that the 387’s have a higher top speed than 377’s (110tph). Originally when the first batch of 387’s were ordered they were going to be classed as 377/8’s but ultimately that never happened because of this. Also there are a few differences with the couplers and electrical wiring meaning that the door systems of a 387 aren’t compatible with 377’s which means that sadly, 377’s and 387’s cannot work together in passenger service (though they can run empty together)What even is the difference between a 377 and 387
I should also add that there are differences in the interior, namely that the Class 377 has good old fashioned comfortable seats and the Class 387s have ironing boards. Nearly all of the seating throughout the train is 2+2 as well, rather than the mix of 2+2 and 2+3 present on most Class 377s.The big difference between the two is that the 387’s have a higher top speed than 377’s (110tph). Originally when the first batch of 387’s were ordered they were going to be classed as 377/8’s but ultimately that never happened because of this. Also there are a few differences with the couplers and electrical wiring meaning that the door systems of a 387 aren’t compatible with 377’s which means that sadly, 377’s and 387’s cannot work together in passenger service (though they can run empty together)
Some of the later 377s have ironing boards as well.I should also add that there are differences in the interior, namely that the Class 377 has good old fashioned comfortable seats and the Class 387s have ironing boards. Nearly all of the seating throughout the train is 2+2 as well, rather than the mix of 2+2 and 2+3 present on most Class 377s.
In general, the inability to operate Class 377s and Class 387s together I would say is it a bit of bummer. However, if they are predominately allocated to either the West or East Coastway generally in the long term, its not much of an issue, given the trains usually operate as single and uncoupled 4-car units, and I suppose if they ever needed to extend them to 5-cars should demand ever increase (which I highly doubt given fares will probably end up skyrocketing at this rate after this so called "trial" on LNER, which there is another thread all about), then they could do that with some units which are semi-permanently assigned to Southern. Although most platforms can handle coupled 8-car units, in most cases its of little importance to regional services in most cases.
I suppose one of the future refreshes they could do with those units will probably be eventually to repaint them into Southern colours, so they more closely match the Class 377s which they are partially displacing, presumably to allow a few to head off to Southeastern, whilst still boosting capacity (presumably) on London suburban routes, given Class 377/3s could be soon be made largely redundant except on Bognor Shuttle and Seaford services (where you can't really justify 4-car trains to the same extent as other routes.
Worth noting that the 377/6s and 377/7s have ironing board seats andI should also add that there are differences in the interior, namely that the Class 377 has good old fashioned comfortable seats and the Class 387s have ironing boards. Nearly all of the seating throughout the train is 2+2 as well, rather than the mix of 2+2 and 2+3 present on most Class 377s.
In general, the inability to operate Class 377s and Class 387s together I would say is it a bit of bummer. However, if they are predominately allocated to either the West or East Coastway generally in the long term, its not much of an issue, given the trains usually operate as single and uncoupled 4-car units, and I suppose if they ever needed to extend them to 5-cars should demand ever increase (which I highly doubt given fares will probably end up skyrocketing at this rate after this so called "trial" on LNER, which there is another thread all about), then they could do that with some units which are semi-permanently assigned to Southern. Although most platforms can handle coupled 8-car units, in most cases its of little importance to regional services in most cases.
I suppose one of the future refreshes they could do with those units will probably be eventually to repaint them into Southern colours, so they more closely match the Class 377s which they are partially displacing, presumably to allow a few to head off to Southeastern, whilst still boosting capacity (presumably) on London suburban routes, given Class 377/3s could be soon be made largely redundant except on Bognor Shuttle and Seaford services (where you can't really justify 4-car trains to the same extent as other routes.
They can and frequently do couple with other 377s in passenger serviceWorth noting that the 377/6s and 377/7s have ironing board seats and cannot multi with other 377s apparently. Reason is they are effectively 387s disguised as 377s.
I don't know where you've heard that, but it's completely false.Worth noting that the 377/6s and 377/7s have ironing board seats and cannot multi with other 377s