• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cricket

Harbouring

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
262
Its because he was charged with “only” affray that he has been reinstated subsequent to that. Had he been charged with assault or bodily harm I think he would still be suspended
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
97OpJwk.jpg

Apprantly balls hitting the grass is now out according to the 3rd umpire.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
97OpJwk.jpg

Apprantly balls hitting the grass is now out according to the 3rd umpire.
The cameras are next to useless in spotting whether a ball has touched grass in close cases so, imo, the official should rule 'not out' if he's unsure.
 

Arglwydd Golau

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2011
Messages
1,449
The cameras are next to useless in spotting whether a ball has touched grass in close cases so, imo, the official should rule 'not out' if he's unsure.

Exactly, every time these incidents occur, it is impossible to judge whether the catch has been taken cleanly from the slow-mo pictures. However, the Umpires thought he was out....that 'soft signal' is apparently what is irking Smith. Oh and the lip balm issue which is a non-event to him, bit like the head-butting incident,then.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
The cameras are next to useless in spotting whether a ball has touched grass in close cases so, imo, the official should rule 'not out' if he's unsure.
Most cases multiple camera angles paint the picture. It's the blurr-o-vision that's the issue. For some reason our TV networks that do sport can get a super slo mo of someone eating a pie in the stands but not where you need it!

In this case the umpires went upstairs for it and gave the soft signal of out. Which how can they be cretin it's out given they only see it real time.
They were talking about it during the replays and Mark Taylor I think made the point that the only way the ball could of ended up in the glove like it did was it had to hit the grass.
 

96tommy

Member
Joined
18 May 2010
Messages
1,076
Location
London
To say we were on 8-5 !!!!! at one point we set a reasonable target. I thought at that point we would need some good luck to get a 100+
 
Last edited:

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,391
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
It is not only England who have an off-day in an ODI match, as in the Bangladesh v Sri Lanka ODI match, Bangladesh also batted first and were all out for 82 in 24 overs. Sri Lanka's opening batsmen made short work of some poor Bangladeshi bowling and only took 11.5 overs to reach their winning total of 83-0.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
The final ODI is about to get underway at the new Perth Stadium.
Australia have won the first toss and will bowl first.
Looked to be a good match for the inauguration. Ball a v poor substitute for Woakes though. Tye and T. Curran both did very well for novices.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
First T20 international last night at the SCG
NZ made 9/117 off thier 20 overs with Tye and Stanlake being the pick of the bowlers.
Rain reduced the Australian side of the innings down to 15 overs and a target of 95 which they chased down in 11.3 Overs.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,069
Location
Redcar
Anyone else see the utter farce in South Africa today? Lunch taken in the ODI with India needing two more runs to win. Two! I've long thought that having an interval when the first innings is over quickly is a nonsense* but this just takes the biscuit for absurdity.

*Personally I'd say that you take the full 40 minute break no matter when the first innings is over. No need for this silly innings break followed by some more play followed by the interval.
 

Macwomble

Member
Joined
15 Dec 2016
Messages
348
Location
Hamilton West
Anyone else see the utter farce in South Africa today? Lunch taken in the ODI with India needing two more runs to win. Two! I've long thought that having an interval when the first innings is over quickly is a nonsense* but this just takes the biscuit for absurdity.

*Personally I'd say that you take the full 40 minute break no matter when the first innings is over. No need for this silly innings break followed by some more play followed by the interval.

Agreed totally...a complete & utter farce that (frankly) takes the p**s of the paying customers.

Couldn't believe I was actually seeing what I was seeing. Now I know why Kholi was having a "mow" in that last over before they took the break.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
Anyone else see the utter farce in South Africa today? Lunch taken in the ODI with India needing two more runs to win. Two! I've long thought that having an interval when the first innings is over quickly is a nonsense* but this just takes the biscuit for absurdity.

*Personally I'd say that you take the full 40 minute break no matter when the first innings is over. No need for this silly innings break followed by some more play followed by the interval.
Madness: two runs with nine wickets in hand, to boot. How many of those spectators will now never attend another match? The reason will be MONEY of course: no doubt caterers would have to be handsomely recompensed if lunch wasn't taken.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
Older followers of the England cricket team who used to be able to watch test matches on TV without subscription (or even adverts!) will probably remember Bernard Thomas, who was England physio for many years and often came rushing on to the pitch to attend to players. As he has died, and I only by chance saw a newspaper obituary some days after its publication, I just thought others on here might like to know.
One particular incident in his career is definitely worthy of mention, because he undoubtedly saved the life of Ewan Chatfield of New Zealand on the field in 1973. Peter Lever, England's fast bowler, had felled the tailender with a bouncer (helmets for batsmen didn't exist then) and he collapsed, swallowing his tongue in the process. There were no doctors present, nor any lifesaving medical equipment, and it was the England fielders who urgently summoned Thomas onto the field - he applied the 'kiss of life' to Chatfield. Dennis Amiss, fielding at slip, said Chatfield had turned blue before Thomas's intervention, and it was Amiss who was instrumental in getting a batting helmet developed: he was the very first batsman to wear one. Peter Lever was devastated and, in retrospect, he was never the same bowler again.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
The 2nd T20 International has been done Australia taking the chocolates by 5 wickets.
England made 9/155. Australia chased it down with 9 balls to go with Maxwell sending one over the fence to win and bring up his 100.

Everyone's favorite game of is it a catch or not was played again last night. With the 3rd umpire ruling it was grassed ball.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
The final T20 in Australia has been finished with Australia defeating a very disappointing England by 7 wickets.
England made 7/137 off the 20 with Australia chasing it down in 14.3 overs.
Still not terrible seats for the evening:
ef5ncgj.jpg
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Wow. Going to Edgbaston for T20 vs AUS in June, that's £56, and I thought that was expensive.
Mind you where I was sitting were the most expansive seats which were the Platinum seats.
Gold was $109 (61 pounds)
Silver $79 (44.60 pounds)
Bronze $55 (31 pounds)
Standard $44 (25 pounds)
General Admission $30 (17 pounds)

If I had of used my AFL membership it would of been $30 for a seat upgrade.
Although funnily enough where I sat is part of the AFL members area for the football season.
 
Last edited:

Top