• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cricket

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
Ben stokes has gone to NZ to visit fam........play cricket.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-30/ben-stokes-england-ashes-selection/9211768?section=sport


The irony is that the side he will be playing with suspended one of thier players due to an assault charge.

Fair to say the ECBs bull is being called out at the moment.

Stokes, of course, was born in NZ and still has family there and the ECB indicate they didn't know he was going to NZ. If the ECB were upto mischief why not find an Aussie club and parachute him in there on a contract till the end of the Ashes?

It is clear that the CPS wont make a decision on what charges, if any, Stokes should face for several weeks. He will then need to be summonsed with a date to appear before the court thereafter, ideally about 4 weeks but often longer. He isnt going to play much part in the Ashes series. Should he be prevented from earning a living until he is charged & convicted?

BTW I am sure the Aussies would never resort to any form of gamesmanship/sledging/clever antics/boozing/having a ruck at all. Ever. Anyway - Stokes or no Stokes Aus will win the ashes.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Stokes, of course, was born in NZ and still has family there and the ECB indicate they didn't know he was going to NZ. If the ECB were upto mischief why not find an Aussie club and parachute him in there on a contract till the end of the Ashes?
I would imagine Cricket Australia would forbid it.


BTW I am sure the Aussies would never resort to any form of gamesmanship/sledging/clever antics/boozing/having a ruck at all. Ever. Anyway - Stokes or no Stokes Aus will win the ashes.
If one of our players did what Stokes did he won't be playing and would of had a ban of some description. Our professional sporting organizations tend to have a high level of standards. They don't tolerate bad behavior that brings ether the game or the club in disrepute.

oTcRxSX.png

Here's the weather for the test. Might be a bit of a disruption to the first days play as Adelaide are on the west side of the biblical level of rain we on the south and east coast are mean to receive.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
If one of our players did what Stokes did he won't be playing and would of had a ban of some description. Our professional sporting organizations tend to have a high level of standards. They don't tolerate bad behavior that brings ether the game or the club in disrepute.

He hasn't been convicted of any crime. He hasn't even been charged with anything yet. Does the principle of innocent until proven guilty not apply in Australia?
 

Arglwydd Golau

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2011
Messages
1,449
If the ECB were upto mischief why not find an Aussie club and parachute him in there on a contract till the end of the Ashes? .

I can't imagine an Aussie club would ever do that in the circumstances....unlike English counties who fall over themselves to give Australian Cricketers experience and practice
 

EbbwJunction1

Established Member
Joined
25 Mar 2010
Messages
1,758
Location
Newport, South Wales
In The Times this morning, it says that the Worcestershire all-rounder Alex Hepburn is facing two charges of rape.

Apparently, although he was only charged on 9th November, he was arrested in April. Stephen Rhodes, Worcestershire's Director of Cricket, has been put on paid leave because Alex Hepburn told him about the arrest in April, but he failed to pass on the information to his Chairman or to any member of the Board.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,637

Cletus

Established Member
Joined
11 Dec 2010
Messages
2,397
Location
Dover
I had expected Stokes to jet into South Africa or Bangladesh to join a team in the T20 tournaments going on there at the moment.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
If Mooen isn't able to bowl, will England be brave and give Mason Crane a debut? I think I know the answer to that, and it doesn't involve bravery. Statistically, Steve Smith is more vulnerable to a leggie or slow left armer than any other bowler, so, naturally, we'll toss up a few dobbers instead, for fair play's sake. Most of the cricket writers/commentators I respect predicted a 3-1 victory to Australia before the series, and most (if asked) cited Adelaide as the 1, so if we don't at least hold our heads high at the end of it I'm afraid it's curtains.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
I had expected Stokes to jet into South Africa or Bangladesh to join a team in the T20 tournaments going on there at the moment.
He'll be playing for one of the Kiwi state sides this weekend, I believe. It wouldn't be a huge surprise if he were to be parachuted into the England side for the Perth test, unless we win big at Adelaide. That would cause the mother and father of all controversies, not only in Oz!
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,391
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
In a matter reminiscent of the England second innings debacle in that last Test Match, West Indies made a bright start in the first innings of their Test Match against New Zealand, reaching 75-1 then lost the benefit of that start and were all out for 134. Wagner 14.4 - 2 - 39 - 7 being their bête noire.

Day 2 has ended with New Zealand in reply in their first innings on 447-9:-
de Grandhomme 105
Taylor 93
Nicholls 67
Blendell 57 not out.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
It appears England have taken offense to Smith laughing at the press conference when Bancroft was explaining the Bairstow incident. There's a very clear tactic to sledge Smith while he is out the middle.
Why they've decided to take offense to Smith laughing at Bancroft is beyond me. What keeps them happy I guess.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
I think the day went to Australia after England won the toss and put them in reaching 209-4 at the close. England got their length wrong for far to long.

It appears England have taken offense to Smith laughing at the press conference when Bancroft was explaining the Bairstow incident. There's a very clear tactic to sledge Smith while he is out the middle.
Why they've decided to take offense to Smith laughing at Bancroft is beyond me. What keeps them happy I guess.

And, of course, the Aussie never take offence to anything and use it to wind themselves up do they ;)

BTW - Glen McGrath comes over as a really nice bloke on the radio. I want to really dislike him for his constant destruction of the England team but he is really funny and seems like a genuinely nice bloke.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
I think the day went to Australia after England won the toss and put them in reaching 209-4 at the close. England got their length wrong for far to long.
The first session it was easy pickings for the batmen. After the rain delay they did fix thier length up a bit and gave a bit of trouble.

And, of course, the Aussie never take offence to anything and use it to wind themselves up do they ;)
It just seems like an odd thing to be wound up over. If I'm in the Australian camp I would be taking that as a win as it's showing thier minds are more on some irrelevant press conference than on the game.

As expected the night session is very difficult to bat in. Im guessing Australia will want to bat until the dinner break and have a go at bowling at England under lights. England had the new ball moving with the one over they had with it.

I do question Roots decision to bowl first. I think he got sucked in by the cloud cover. The ball really didn't do all that much in the daylight hours. Had it not rained Australia could easily be 250-300. It was the first time since 1992 a side has opted to bowl first at the Adelaide Oval.
 

Pakenhamtrain

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2014
Messages
1,202
Location
Melbourne, Australia
This is becoming a very laughable delay. There's no rain the covers are off. GET ON WITH IT! Oh no a drop of water is on a blade of grass it's too dangerous.

UPDATE: Play abandoned. Sack whoever made that call. It's beyond unacceptable. It's perfectly playable.

Expecting people to part with thier hard earned for farcical decisions like that.
 
Last edited:

96tommy

Member
Joined
18 May 2010
Messages
1,076
Location
London
Just set the alarm once again for the start of play. Nothing fancy needed today, just stay at the crease, time for every player to get stuck in. It doesn't matter how long it takes, need to get as close to 442 as we can and have a better bowling game in the next innings. We could do with Australia being equally as poor with the new ball as we was when it comes out this evening. All in all, the longer we stay in bat, the better.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
This is becoming a very laughable delay. There's no rain the covers are off. GET ON WITH IT! Oh no a drop of water is on a blade of grass it's too dangerous.

UPDATE: Play abandoned. Sack whoever made that call. It's beyond unacceptable. It's perfectly playable.

Expecting people to part with thier hard earned for farcical decisions like that.

superb decision. Really unsafe for the England players. They couldn't hit the ball ;)
 

Top