• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 456's on the move?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,154
Location
SWR Metals
I think in future we should just keep away from each other then this will prevent any further problems.
 
Last edited:

HarleyDavidson

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2014
Messages
2,544
I don't know what your problem is with me but stop being abusive.You should know better but obviously don't.

Try to post within the subject topic which seems to be a bit hard for you.

Im quite willing to take this further if you wish to discuss this at work.

I will be ignoring all your posts from now on,feel free to ignore mine.

Sorry... But as you know me and the amount P taking that goes on, you should realise that I wasn't not being abusive, I was just taking the mickey out of you! :roll:

Still if you want it that way fine. But I was only taking the mickey! Geeze!
 

Feathers44

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
378
Um...

We finally got a ride on one of these last night between Vauxhall and Clapham J. (I think it was 22:22 from Vauxhall to Woking when we got it).

Internally, they're in noticeably better nick than the 455s (unsurprisingly) and very well lit. It was quite a smooth ride. My son was particularly pleased, in fact he looked a bit incredulous when it pulled up in front of us!

I didn't get the number (it was paired with 005 for the evening) because we were distracted by a quick conversation with the guard who was at the front cab on the platform at CJ (Sam was more interested in the driving controls I think).
 

HarleyDavidson

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2014
Messages
2,544
The last two have gone, so I guess we should expect them back in a couple of months time or so.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
Jesus Christ, they must have been grim to be worse than Vomit Comets...
Perhaps they should get rid of the toilets on the voyagers to if they are so bad. Who cares about the people travelling who might actually need the too whilst on route.
 
Last edited:
Joined
20 Feb 2015
Messages
87
Location
Halifax
Perhaps they should get rid of the toilets on the voyagers to if they are so bad. Who cares about the people travelling who might actually need the too whilst on route.

Don't take the toilet out... Maybe just try and persuade CrossCountry to actually pay for toilet treatment so they don't stink out the whole carriage/train!
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
Don't take the toilet out... Maybe just try and persuade CrossCountry to actually pay for toilet treatment so they don't stink out the whole carriage/train!
If it's that simple, why didn't they do that to the 456s so that people could have toilets to use when travelling by train.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
If it's that simple, why didn't they do that to the 456s so that people could have toilets to use when travelling by train.

Weren't the toilets on the 456s constantly being trashed, which led to their removal (along with the need for more space/limited requirements for toilets on 'metro' type services) in Southern days? I see no reason to assume that either of those factors is any different now that they're on SWT suburban services.
 

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,154
Location
SWR Metals
Weren't the toilets on the 456s constantly being trashed, which led to their removal (along with the need for more space/limited requirements for toilets on 'metro' type services) in Southern days? I see no reason to assume that either of those factors is any different now that they're on SWT suburban services.

Trashed and used as a drugs den apparently.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
Don't take the toilet out... Maybe just try and persuade CrossCountry to actually pay for toilet treatment so they don't stink out the whole carriage/train!

The Vomiters will shortly be due for a mid-life overhaul I'd have thought, so perhaps the stink issues can be sorted then. However, that's not really all that relevant to 456s going to SWT...
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
The Vomiters will shortly be due for a mid-life overhaul I'd have thought, so perhaps the stink issues can be sorted then. However, that's not really all that relevant to 456s going to SWT...

Aren't quite a few classes of units both DMU and EMU due for mid-life overhauls within the next few years?
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
Trashed and used as a drugs den apparently.
Perhaps they should have cancelled the services completely. I remember when the last train from Brighton was cancelled on Friday and Saturday nights due to drunks. Isn't some stations not served from Reading to Gatwick Airport late at night again due to drunks.
 

DY444

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2012
Messages
138
Another issue with the 456 toilets was that they did not have trace heaters fitted to the toilet tanks when built due to a spec oversight. This meant that the water could and did freeze in winter resulting in burst feeder pipes and consequent damage to the unit. The "solution" was to drain the systems down and lock the toilets out of use in the winter. Eventually they were locked out permanently, and, as they primarily worked with 455s which had no toilets it was no surprise when they were eventually removed.
 
Last edited:

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
988
The final downfall for the 456 toilets were DDA related, the toilet was replaced by seats from by the doors so that wheelchair users had a space within the unit.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
The final downfall for the 456 toilets were DDA related, the toilet was replaced by seats from by the doors so that wheelchair users had a space within the unit.
I find that slightly ironic, given I have a health issue that requires me to sometimes need to use a toilet suddenly, that they were taken out because they were not disabled compliant. One could argue the train is now not compliant with those who have health needs that mean they might need the loo suddenly.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,252
One could argue the train is now not compliant with those who have health needs that mean they might need the loo suddenly.

One could argue that, but arguing that every few weeks becomes repetitiive. You must realise by now that there is no requirement for all trains to have toilets.
 

HarleyDavidson

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2014
Messages
2,544
If you saw the state of the toilets of a 450 when one is used on the Ascot line services, you'd soon realise that in some respects that a 456 is an ideal unit for that route.

However you'll also find a considerable number of plastic bottles filled with yellow water on them (456's) too & as one cleaner found a sausage & we're not talking of a pork one! :shock:
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
One could argue that, but arguing that every few weeks becomes repetitiive. You must realise by now that there is no requirement for all trains to have toilets.
I agree there is no requirement to have loos. One could have argues that if loos have were provided, there should be no requires for them to be DDA compliant. However it was decided that they should be in the more wider sense I mean rather than this but that's going off topic.

I guess one can't cater for every minority group out there. It's just unfortunate that a number of the stations that the 456s go through don't have loos or have very limited opening times if they do.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If you saw the state of the toilets of a 450 when one is used on the Ascot line services, you'd soon realise that in some respects that a 456 is an ideal unit for that route.

However you'll also find a considerable number of plastic bottles filled with yellow water on them (456's) too & as one cleaner found a sausage & we're not talking of a pork one! :shock:
I wouldn't like to day which is more preferable, the left over bottles or toilets. I guess if the former is self contained fine but was it all Self contained given the occupant might have been drunk....
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
One only has to look at the amount of space lost to fully accessible toilets on shorter 2-car units (150s/e144) to see that fitting them to 456s wouldn't really be practical. Especially as they're used for the most part on short, frequent, suburban journeys where the lack of a toilet is not such a major problem.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
One only has to look at the amount of space lost to fully accessible toilets on shorter 2-car units (150s/e144) to see that fitting them to 456s wouldn't really be practical. Especially as they're used for the most part on short, frequent, suburban journeys where the lack of a toilet is not such a major problem.

I personally don't class Guildford to Claygate suburban or even the line between from Effingham Junction and Leatherhead.

I appreciate for the purposes of South West Trains they may be classed as such for the services.
 
Last edited:

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Presumably, yes- loos have been retrofitted on Scotrail's class 320s
 

Defiance149

Member
Joined
30 Dec 2013
Messages
495
Can anyone confirm which of 456013 and 456022 arrived back at Wimbledon last week from Wolverton please?
 

HarleyDavidson

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2014
Messages
2,544
I think there maybe a couple OOS today after being involved in a fatality at Whitton, unless they've changed the diagram of 2N14 to a 450.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top