HarleyDavidson
Established Member
- Joined
- 23 Aug 2014
- Messages
- 2,544
You and work, that's an oxymoron if ever I saw one.
I don't know what your problem is with me but stop being abusive.You should know better but obviously don't.
Try to post within the subject topic which seems to be a bit hard for you.
Im quite willing to take this further if you wish to discuss this at work.
I will be ignoring all your posts from now on,feel free to ignore mine.
You and work, that's an oxymoron if ever I saw one.
Edit, deleted after reading the posts after the one I quoted, this one was originally far too humorous! :roll:
All the green one's are gone. It's just a shame that they keep sending the darn things back to us, albeit with a different paint scheme and seating.
Perhaps they should get rid of the toilets on the voyagers to if they are so bad. Who cares about the people travelling who might actually need the too whilst on route.Jesus Christ, they must have been grim to be worse than Vomit Comets...
Perhaps they should get rid of the toilets on the voyagers to if they are so bad. Who cares about the people travelling who might actually need the too whilst on route.
If it's that simple, why didn't they do that to the 456s so that people could have toilets to use when travelling by train.Don't take the toilet out... Maybe just try and persuade CrossCountry to actually pay for toilet treatment so they don't stink out the whole carriage/train!
If it's that simple, why didn't they do that to the 456s so that people could have toilets to use when travelling by train.
Weren't the toilets on the 456s constantly being trashed, which led to their removal (along with the need for more space/limited requirements for toilets on 'metro' type services) in Southern days? I see no reason to assume that either of those factors is any different now that they're on SWT suburban services.
Don't take the toilet out... Maybe just try and persuade CrossCountry to actually pay for toilet treatment so they don't stink out the whole carriage/train!
Don't take the toilet out... Maybe just try and persuade CrossCountry to actually pay for toilet treatment so they don't stink out the whole carriage/train!
The Vomiters will shortly be due for a mid-life overhaul I'd have thought, so perhaps the stink issues can be sorted then. However, that's not really all that relevant to 456s going to SWT...
Perhaps they should have cancelled the services completely. I remember when the last train from Brighton was cancelled on Friday and Saturday nights due to drunks. Isn't some stations not served from Reading to Gatwick Airport late at night again due to drunks.Trashed and used as a drugs den apparently.
I find that slightly ironic, given I have a health issue that requires me to sometimes need to use a toilet suddenly, that they were taken out because they were not disabled compliant. One could argue the train is now not compliant with those who have health needs that mean they might need the loo suddenly.The final downfall for the 456 toilets were DDA related, the toilet was replaced by seats from by the doors so that wheelchair users had a space within the unit.
One could argue the train is now not compliant with those who have health needs that mean they might need the loo suddenly.
I agree there is no requirement to have loos. One could have argues that if loos have were provided, there should be no requires for them to be DDA compliant. However it was decided that they should be in the more wider sense I mean rather than this but that's going off topic.One could argue that, but arguing that every few weeks becomes repetitiive. You must realise by now that there is no requirement for all trains to have toilets.
I wouldn't like to day which is more preferable, the left over bottles or toilets. I guess if the former is self contained fine but was it all Self contained given the occupant might have been drunk....If you saw the state of the toilets of a 450 when one is used on the Ascot line services, you'd soon realise that in some respects that a 456 is an ideal unit for that route.
However you'll also find a considerable number of plastic bottles filled with yellow water on them (456's) too & as one cleaner found a sausage & we're not talking of a pork one!hock:
One only has to look at the amount of space lost to fully accessible toilets on shorter 2-car units (150s/e144) to see that fitting them to 456s wouldn't really be practical. Especially as they're used for the most part on short, frequent, suburban journeys where the lack of a toilet is not such a major problem.