• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 156 experiences?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mainliner

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2010
Messages
357
Location
Northumberland
I'm doing the Glasgow-Mallaig trip later this month (none of it on the Jacobite).

My usual mode of rail transport is 225s/HSDTs on the ECML - can anyone advise me what it's like to spend over 5 hours on a 156? (And another 5 hours the following day :o )
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SouthEastern-465

Established Member
Joined
24 May 2009
Messages
1,660
Location
Greater London
I'm doing the Glasgow-Mallaig trip later this month (none of it on the Jacobite).

My usual mode of rail transport is 225s/HSDTs on the ECML - can anyone advise me what it's like to spend over 5 hours on a 156? (And another 5 hours the following day :o )

Never heard anyone refer to a HST as a HSDT for quite a time!
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,211
Location
UK
They have a pretty good ride. (mk4's where based on them, they are a bit harder than a mk3. However the engines are usually very noisy (more so than a 150, and the interiors are gnerally pretty worn (on most toc's) as I don't think any have had a massive overhaul (think mallard for ec, and emt's 158's.)

Personally I wouldn't want to spend 5 hours on one, but that's because I mainly travel on them (for example I really like 150's as they are a bit different and I think they have lots of character ).
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
They have a pretty good ride. (mk4's where based on them, they are a bit harder than a mk3. However the engines are usually very noisy (more so than a 150, and the interiors are gnerally pretty worn (on most toc's) as I don't think any have had a massive overhaul (think mallard for ec, and emt's 158's.)

Personally I wouldn't want to spend 5 hours on one, but that's because I mainly travel on them (for example I really like 150's as they are a bit different and I think they have lots of character ).

Unfortunately, the ScotRail ones still have the originally half-back Ashbourne seating, with reportedly very thin cushioning.
 

Schnellzug

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2011
Messages
2,926
Location
Evercreech Junction
Is the WHL not suitable for 58s, could they operate on it theoretically, even if there might not be enough available to do so? (Or 170s, even)


** 158s, not 58s.
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,492
Location
Yorkshire
Unfortunately, the ScotRail ones still have the originally half-back Ashbourne seating, with reportedly very thin cushioning.

I did one a few months back from Haymarket to Glasgow via Shotts and the seats do leave something to be desired and would be inclined to agree that they have little padding.

That said, I didn't find the journey particularly torturous, but there again, the journey didn't last 5 hours :P
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,069
Location
Redcar
Is the WHL not suitable for 58s, could they operate on it theoretically, even if there might not be enough available to do so? (Or 170s, even)

There are gauge clearance issues relating to the way that the doors swing out that could foul platform edges. Certainly it's rectifiable but it would cost a fair bit of money. I'm not sure about 170s, but they have a similar style of door to 158s (swing out then open) so could well have the same issue.
 

T163R

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2010
Messages
475
Location
Paris, France
5 hours in a 156 ? That's a bit long for the noise, comfort (5 hours will become uncomfortable in a 156...).
Is ScotRail daft enough to book 156s for 5 hours journeys ??
 

callum112233

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2011
Messages
379
Location
Wigan
Iv'e only ever been on a Northern Rail 156. I have no grumbles except that on some of them, the leg room seems smaller than on others, it seems to differ from train to train. I also agree, I wouldn't want to spend 5 hours on one unless you enjoy a numb arse :D
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,556
Is ScotRail daft enough to book 156s for 5 hours journeys ??

All West Highland line services worked by DMU are class 156. Glasgow Queen St-Mallaig comes in at 5hr13.

Personally I have no problem with the 156 and find them comfortable for longish distances and can't say I've ever noticed the engine noise being intrusive.
 

Sir_Clagalot

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2007
Messages
853
I did that trip four years ago and found them to be quite comfy, with deep seat bolsters and highish backs. Mind, I did spend all my time looking out of the windows so didn't pay too much attention to the interior, but I don't have any bad recollections!! I do remember the PIS got confused once we were past Glenfinnan lol.
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
I've always quite liked the 156s. They just seem reliable, although I appreciate that they are a touch underpowered.

If the 156 is considered to be "unsuitable" for a 5hr+ journey. Of the current multiple units in service in the UK, which would be the more appropriate unit.
 

callum112233

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2011
Messages
379
Location
Wigan
If the 156 is considered to be "unsuitable" for a 5hr+ journey. Of the current multiple units in service in the UK, which would be the more appropriate unit.

How about a class 185? They are designed for steep gradients, for example the transpennine route.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,270
I've always quite liked the 156s. They just seem reliable, although I appreciate that they are a touch underpowered.

If the 156 is considered to be "unsuitable" for a 5hr+ journey. Of the current multiple units in service in the UK, which would be the more appropriate unit.

222? :) or as the previous poster said, the 185s.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,069
Location
Redcar
222? or as the previous poster said, the 185s.

Surely a 125mph intercity units is a tad too much for the WHL? 185s are probably closer to the mark (though of course their top speed would also be wasted) but I wonder if they wouldn't be too much for the track as they are rather heavy.
 

callum112233

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2011
Messages
379
Location
Wigan
I wonder if they wouldn't be too much for the track as they are rather heavy.

I think that was the reason transpennine express use class 170's instead of 185's on the Manchester to Hull route, so your probably right, too heavy :D
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Did that journey in 2008, getting the first early morning train back from Mallaig the next day. Quite a decent journey, excellent scenery and the seats are comfortable enough - although I did stretch my legs at Crianlarich (may also have time to grab a quick cup of tea where the train divides on the way up). If there isn't time at Crianlarich, take some supplies with you!
 

150222

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2011
Messages
1,002
I think that was the reason transpennine express use class 170's instead of 185's on the Manchester to Hull route, so your probably right, too heavy :D



Actually 185's are booked on several hull services they just have a speed restriction while 170's don't.
 

deltic1989

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2010
Messages
1,483
Location
Nottingham
I use an EMT 156 virtually every other week, I haveto say I rather like the ride. When the the windows are open the engine noise can grate on you a bit, but other than that I find them a rather good ride. After saying that I've never sat on one for 5 hours (most I've done was about 1 1/2 hours).
 

Drimnagh Road

Member
Joined
13 Mar 2009
Messages
688
Location
Dublin
For such a tourist oriented route, the 156 just isn't good enough. The longest trip I done on a 156 was from Holyhead-Blackpool North back in the 90s and even then I though three hours was too long.

When you look at the quality of the some of the other units on shorter routes in Scotland, five hours on a 156 really is pathetic.

These days 156s are more at home on 30 minute runs out of Norwich, but certainly not on a route of such community and tourist importance as Glasgow-Fort William / Mallaig

We know there is issues with clearance of 158s / 170s etc, but where's the initiative in dealing with them?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top