• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 156 experiences?

Status
Not open for further replies.

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
those of us north of the border should have a meet on those next year!

I don't live north of the border but I come up a few times a year with work. My regular Rannoch move would be a good venue for a meet: 156 northbound on the 18:21, across the platform for the sleeper south, Edinburgh punters stay on, Glasgow punters (me in this case) bail at Westerton. Do it as close to midsummer as possible, a few nice little drinkies on the 156, heads out Rannoch > Crianlarich or even Ardlui before it gets too dark, then another couple of beers. Lovely jubbly! Split tickets at Helensburgh and Bob's yer uncle! Whole thing costing 2x £7.80 advances Helensburgh > Rannoch and return, plus £6 CDR Glasgow > Helensburgh.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
I did about 10,000 miles on steam heat 37s, a lot of it on the WHL at 35mph! Good thrash but a bit og a waste of locos with so much wear and tear on tyres, Power units etc. 37/4s were much better suited with the lower gearing.
You lucky fella!

Did you know they fudged the outgoing Loco hauled timetable to make sprinters look faster? when they were actually 20 to 30 minutes slower to Oban and 40 minutes slower to Ft. Bill? They added 40 minutes to Dumbarton-QS timetable when 37s were on the way out.
That doesn't surprise me at all: It seems like that sort of ploy was BRs' favoured way to work the PR machine.

For the tour glasgow-oban I prefer the bus to the plastic! It is a more scenic route to Oban. Ft Bill I could take plastic if I didn't have a car.
When travelling up to Fort William I do prefer to take the road option so that I get to see Glencoe (and maybe stop in at the Clachaig for a pint or two!) and be amongst the mountains. The train goes round the back of all that breathtaking natural wonderment. :(

Oban - Mallaig Summer Heritage thrash with some 37's, 26s, 27s and 20s' anyone ? ;)
Where do I sign up? :D I want to have a crack at what I missed!

Surely if the Whitby branch can be cleared for operation of preserved locos and stock from the NYMR as far as Battersby Junction, then it wouldn't be too hard to clear the Mallaig extension from Fort William for similar operation. Scotrail could arrange a PLANDAMPF and turn over the extension completely to loco hauled trains for a week; operating the timetabled service and a few additional extras with Type 2/3s on rakes of four mark 1/2s. Sounds like heaven!
 

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
From the reports that were coming in on this forum at the time, it seemed as though the 156s were one of the few constituents of the Scotrail fleet still operating and having a bash at it in the adverse conditions, while the majority of the much newer 170s were sulking in their depots wailing for a hot water bottle and a warm blanket! ;)

I should have waited for the 158 operated service that was behind my one, though we did end up delaying it by a few minutes because we kept getting stuck at stations. We were sitting at Linlithgow for 25 minutes whilst they tried to get the doors shut. I think from Polmont the guard just used the local door.
 

Bittern

Established Member
Joined
8 Apr 2009
Messages
1,919
Location
Scotland
A 156 at Linlithgow is a rarity these days. You should be pleased you were on such a working!
 

Moog_1984

Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
171
You lucky fella!



When travelling up to Fort William I do prefer to take the road option so that I get to see Glencoe (and maybe stop in at the Clachaig for a pint or two!) and be amongst the mountains. The train goes round the back of all that breathtaking natural wonderment. :( !

Glen coe is very spectacular- Rannoch moor and loch Tulloch are also in a more modest way! The route should have had a glass topped canadian style observation car.

The coast road from Oban is also very scenic and boasted 26's and other type 2s on the Ballachuilish line in the 60s.

Where do I sign up? :D I want to have a crack at what I missed!

and turn over the extension completely to loco hauled trains for a week; operating the timetabled service and a few additional extras with Type 2/3s on rakes of four mark 1/2s. Sounds like heaven !



It would pay its way a week like that. An oban mallaig heritage service would be a great tourist route too.

In regards to that and running limited stop expresses from the two main terminii on the WHL Blotrail have been backwards since the days of ScR.

...all good things come to an end. 37/0s were an absolute riot on the WHL- into second field by the bridge at Arrochar and then what a thrash up that bank to Glen Douglas. Have the dubious honour of bailing at Glen Douglas myself, with the gaurd when the later Ft Bill sleeper became a bus due to snow and the "up" oban was the last train crossing there instead of Arrochar!
 

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
Sounds like you've been as the whiskey again. You should know it makes you say mad things!

I don't mind the 156s, but they do need a proper refurb inside, including new seats, as the current ones aren't very comfortable.
I'd rather an Inverness 158 over a 156, but a 170 over either of them any day.
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
913
I don't mind the 156s, but they do need a proper refurb inside, including new seats, as the current ones aren't very comfortable.
I'd rather an Inverness 158 over a 156, but a 170 over either of them any day.

At last a sensible comment!

Given that Scotrail pax pay approximately the same cost per mile on base fares irrespective of the rolling stock they travel in, those subjected to often lengthy journeys on SR 156s are really getting a raw deal when comparison is made with 334, 380, 170 and even 158s.

In their present state the SR 156s are no longer fit for purpose and act as a real deterrent to new pax to continued travel by train.
 

Bittern

Established Member
Joined
8 Apr 2009
Messages
1,919
Location
Scotland
In their present state the SR 156s are no longer fit for purpose and act as a real deterrent to new pax to continued travel by train.

I'd like to hear your evidence for this. If they weren't "fit for purpose", they wouldn't be running. Yet, they are, and the services the run still carry large amounts of passengers. I should know - I'm a regular commuter on them.

Yes, they're not the most comfortable but then again I can only think of one or two classes that are more comfortable. I can also speak for their reliability, at least from my own experiences. Where other units have failed (maybe a 334 thanks to snow or a 170 because of a gust of wind) the 156s have pretty much always shown up.

I'm sorry, but just because they're not your precious 37s doesn't mean they're not fit for purpose. They obviously are, and indeed operate some pretty important commuter routes in Glasgow.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
I'd like to hear your evidence for this. If they weren't "fit for purpose", they wouldn't be running. Yet, they are, and the services the run still carry large amounts of passengers. I should know - I'm a regular commuter on them.

Yes, they're not the most comfortable but then again I can only think of one or two classes that are more comfortable. I can also speak for their reliability, at least from my own experiences. Where other units have failed (maybe a 334 thanks to snow or a 170 because of a gust of wind) the 156s have pretty much always shown up.

I'm sorry, but just because they're not your precious 37s doesn't mean they're not fit for purpose. They obviously are, and indeed operate some pretty important commuter routes in Glasgow.

It's probably possible to defend 156s (which I happen to think are perfect for the WHL and the best of the 15x 1st generation of 2nd generation DMUs, in terms of style, visibility and comfort) without resorting to slating the mighty class 37.
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
I'd like to hear your evidence for this. If they weren't "fit for purpose", they wouldn't be running. Yet, they are, and the services the run still carry large amounts of passengers. I should know - I'm a regular commuter on them.

Yes, they're not the most comfortable but then again I can only think of one or two classes that are more comfortable. I can also speak for their reliability, at least from my own experiences. Where other units have failed (maybe a 334 thanks to snow or a 170 because of a gust of wind) the 156s have pretty much always shown up.

I'm sorry, but just because they're not your precious 37s doesn't mean they're not fit for purpose. They obviously are, and indeed operate some pretty important commuter routes in Glasgow.

Every other operator has renewed the seating the last 15 years. I don't understand why ScotRail, who uses them over the longest journeys, have not.
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
913
I'd like to hear your evidence for this. If they weren't "fit for purpose", they wouldn't be running. Yet, they are, and the services the run still carry large amounts of passengers. I should know - I'm a regular commuter on them.

Yes, they're not the most comfortable but then again I can only think of one or two classes that are more comfortable. I can also speak for their reliability, at least from my own experiences. Where other units have failed (maybe a 334 thanks to snow or a 170 because of a gust of wind) the 156s have pretty much always shown up.

I'm sorry, but just because they're not your precious 37s doesn't mean they're not fit for purpose. They obviously are, and indeed operate some pretty important commuter routes in Glasgow.

Well firstly I have never mentioned class 37s in any post of mine since joining this forum, so try again on that score!

Why are the S/R 156s not fit for purpose?

Take the seats shall we - despite many many changes of cover, the bits that matter ie the sprung seat squab (cushion that you seat on) and the associated backrest are in most cases the original fittings. The squabs are variously lumpy, have metal framing with no padding left around it or no wadding over the springs. The backrest internal filling's have shrunk to the degree that most if not all seats have a gap at the top between the backrest and seat frame. The armrests are often missing or so droopy as to be useless.

To move on to ventilation. Because they have no forced air ventilation or air con, hopper type windows are fitted. Many of these won't stay shut when passing another train or entering/exiting a tunnel. When open these hoppers create a significant draught, not for the person that opened them, but for the unfortunate sitting on the opposite side one or more rows back.

The heating system is either on or off, and in winter owing to relying on an old fashioned coolant heated from, and piped from the engine, cannot keep the train warm, let alone hot.

Turning to the rest of the interior, many vestibule doors are either missing or jammed open. Rubber door seals are worn and have gaps allowing draughts to arise. As there is no heating in the vestibule the cold air then enters the seating area so those passengers near the vestibules lose the benefit of what warmth there was.

Finally the toilets - still emptying on the track in 2011!

Just because they are reliable (no dispute there), and carry large amounts of commuters (who have no alternative) does not make them fit for purpose.

My evidence comes from regular use on the Stranraer-Ayr and Carlisle- Glasgow GSW services.
 

Schnellzug

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2011
Messages
2,926
Location
Evercreech Junction
I'd like to hear your evidence for this. If they weren't "fit for purpose", they wouldn't be running. Yet, they are, and the services the run still carry large amounts of passengers. I should know - I'm a regular commuter on them.

Yes, they're not the most comfortable but then again I can only think of one or two classes that are more comfortable. I can also speak for their reliability, at least from my own experiences. Where other units have failed (maybe a 334 thanks to snow or a 170 because of a gust of wind) the 156s have pretty much always shown up.

I'm sorry, but just because they're not your precious 37s doesn't mean they're not fit for purpose. They obviously are, and indeed operate some pretty important commuter routes in Glasgow.

I don't know, I expect many would be able to suggest routes on which particular stock wasn't fit for purpose but was used nevertheless. It doesn't necessarily mean it's not safe, just, well, not best suited for the task.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
I don't know, I expect many would be able to suggest routes on which particular stock wasn't fit for purpose but was used nevertheless. It doesn't necessarily mean it's not safe, just, well, not best suited for the task.

As anyone who's been on a 150 from Plymouth to Penzance or Cardiff to Fishgaurd will testify.
 

Moog_1984

Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
171
There awful, give me a pacer any day :)

I did think they could be cold in the winter.

Depends on your expectation: great for the paisley canal line, kilmarnock-glasgow, maybe crewe-derby and various 40 min commutes.

Otherwise they have driven many to the bus and car in scotland on the longer routes because they are slower than loco hauled and less comfortable than any of the old stock. All the routes they operate over 100 miles in Scotland can be done faster by car and usually bus.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
2,173
Location
Huyton
I did think they could be cold in the winter.

Depends on your expectation: great for the paisley canal line, kilmarnock-glasgow, maybe crewe-derby and various 40 min commutes.

Otherwise they have driven many to the bus and car in scotland on the longer routes because they are slower than loco hauled and less comfortable than any of the old stock. All the routes they operate over 100 miles in Scotland can be done faster by car and usually bus.

the only time i've ever found a 156 to be cold is first thing on a winters morning.

in terms of noise it really depends where you sit. if you sit in the middle of the carriages, or the inner ends of the carriages expect it to be noisy, but if you sit at the outer ends of the train they're really quite quiet.

I really don't think you can beat a 156 in terms of ride quality. They just feel so composed on the rails, even at *ahem high speeds.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Give me a 156 over any other unit on the rails today except a 175. They are the stars of the second generation DMUs. All this stuff about seats etc is superficial; the intrinsic quality of the train is there for all to see.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
Give me a 156 over any other unit on the rails today except a 175. They are the stars of the second generation DMUs. All this stuff about seats etc is superficial; the intrinsic quality of the train is there for all to see.
Hear hear! I'd rather have a 170 for a long distance regional journey, but the 156s are a perfect, good all round regional DMU, absolutely perfectly suited to journeys with an end to end time of an hour or two. It's the 156s that were the inspiration for my username on this forum. :)
 

duffman82

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2010
Messages
244
Location
Wolverhampton/Liverpool
Got to say, I have to love class 156's, great at those 1-2hr journeys!
Any news which 156's of Northerns will be cascaded to EMT? I hope 156460 ain't because it won't stalk me anymore :/
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
Any news which 156's of Northerns will be cascaded to EMT? I hope 156460 ain't because it won't stalk me anymore :/
156497 and 498 have already moved across to EMT reportedly. Apparently the four units will all be former Northern Spirit examples. Which is a shame as I think that, numerically, it'd be better to get shot of 156420/1.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
I need to do a bit more 156 bashing. So far this year I've only made 6 156 moves, all ScotRail and 2 of which were Glasgow QS > Rannoch on the 18:21 Mallaig! A respectable average of 61 miles per move though. I'm planning to do Glasgow QS > Anniesland next Thursday, which is hardly earth shattering mileage accumulation and will bring the average distance crashing down.
 

Bittern

Established Member
Joined
8 Apr 2009
Messages
1,919
Location
Scotland
If the QS - Anniesland service is anything like it was last year, you'll probably end up with a 158.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
Well, I'm doing it for the required track from Maryhill Central Jn to Anniesland, so it doesn't really matter what's on it TBH.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,544
up for one of your work/bashing trips? Look forward to reading it! If you want 156s, most DMU runs from GLA have them.
 

Bittern

Established Member
Joined
8 Apr 2009
Messages
1,919
Location
Scotland
Would make for an interesting trip considering GLA's station only exists in the land of dreams.
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
It's a leisure trip while the wife takes the kids to Ireland during half term. After work on Wednesday up to London from Morley/Leeds, then on the sleeper to Aberdeen, HST south to Edonburgh, over to Queen Street, Anniesland, Milngavie (also required), Central, Carlisle (Pendolino :() and home to Shipley.

My favourite ever ticket is being used here, that is the £20 VWC + connections advance ticket from seemingly anywhere in the Central Belt (in this case Edinburgh) to Shipley (or seemingly anywhere in West Yorkshire) via Glasgow and Appleby. Winner!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top