• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 810 for East Midlands Railway Construction/Introduction Updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
2,525
Now that the first 810 is in passenger service, may I suggest a @QSK19-style bet of my own?

No 810s on Sunday morning diagrams until 2027.* I don't know how realistic this is but it's in keeping with their protracted entry into service ;)

[* Luton Airport Parkway is my local station so it's only served by Intercity services on Sunday mornings]
 

liamf656

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
1,726
Location
Derby
Can you tell from the front which is the first class end, you could tell on the class 222s by the yellow paint on the bar on the coupling.
The destination screen will have a white spot on the left, if its the first class end
 

222001

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2006
Messages
838
Location
Chesterfield
From pictures I've seen, no, can not tell from the front end.

Only by the side where windows are covered etc.
There’s a white dot on the front facing destination display that indicates the first class end.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8170.jpeg
    IMG_8170.jpeg
    67.1 KB · Views: 254

jontyasaurus

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2024
Messages
20
Location
Chesterfield
Was 810010 the wrong way around today? 1st was at the back, I thought the usual arrangement is for 1st to be at the front, closest to the exit at the terminus.
 

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
5,363
Was 810010 the wrong way around today? 1st was at the back, I thought the usual arrangement is for 1st to be at the front, closest to the exit at the terminus.
I wondered that too. It is customary for 1st to be at the London end
 

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
5,363
I’ve heard there’s an issue with the accessible toilet, is that in Coach C?
Coach C definitely isn't an accessible loo, I used it earlier.

And no, it wasn't me either fare evading or locked in!
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,854
I wondered that too. It is customary for 1st to be at the London end
Not on the Midland it isn’t. Because of the geography of the route trains can easily become turned e.g. a train going onto Etches Park after arriving direct from London could go empty stock to Nottingham the following morning and so become turned.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,379
Was 810010 the wrong way around today? 1st was at the back, I thought the usual arrangement is for 1st to be at the front, closest to the exit at the terminus.
Unsure if planned route, but ecs ran via Toton, that would turn the set.
 

61248

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2012
Messages
30
anyone got any pics from today to upload here by any chance?
At Derby (pity about the low winter sunshine)



Interesting hour or so with
81009 on the 14.19 to Cricklewood
810010 14.32 (from Derby)Sheffield to St Pancras
37800 with 455714 & 455730 in tow -Wimbledown to Litchurch Lane
50008 Rugby to Derby RTC with DR80201 Stone Blower
and Romic HST 43122 & 43094 Mid Norfolk Railway to Chaddesden Sidings
 

Attachments

  • 2025-  6937a December 03rd Derby-.jpg
    2025- 6937a December 03rd Derby-.jpg
    514.8 KB · Views: 167

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,272
At Derby (pity about the low winter sunshine)



Interesting hour or so with
81009 on the 14.19 to Cricklewood
810010 14.32 (from Derby)Sheffield to St Pancras
37800 with 455714 & 455730 in tow -Wimbledown to Litchurch Lane
50008 Rugby to Derby RTC with DR80201 Stone Blower
and Romic HST 43122 & 43094 Mid Norfolk Railway to Chaddesden Sidings
looks shiny! and some interesting moves on your list there
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,642
Location
Hampshire
I’d say the opposite if it’s full of veg! :lol:

Anyway, I’m shocked, we’ve got this far and nobody has mentioned the seats yet!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,670
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Anyway, I’m shocked, we’ve got this far and nobody has mentioned the seats yet!

The FISA LEAN is pretty well known. From the pictures I've seen the legroom looks poor, though, I'd be interested to know what those who have actually been on one think.

One very interesting observation I've made is that there appears to be no floor level bodyside conduit - I assume heating is all underfloor, but even on units that have underfloor heating thus far e.g. the 730 the conduit is still there.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,924
The FISA LEAN is pretty well known. From the pictures I've seen the legroom looks poor, though, I'd be interested to know what those who have actually been on one think.

One very interesting observation I've made is that there appears to be no floor level bodyside conduit - I assume heating is all underfloor, but even on units that have underfloor heating thus far e.g. the 730 the conduit is still there.
I'm 6 foot plus and whilst it isn't "ample" it isn't bad either.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,379
The FISA LEAN is pretty well known. From the pictures I've seen the legroom looks poor, though, I'd be interested to know what those who have actually been on one think.

One very interesting observation I've made is that there appears to be no floor level bodyside conduit - I assume heating is all underfloor, but even on units that have underfloor heating thus far e.g. the 730 the conduit is still there.
Yes the unit does have underfloor heating.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,670
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I'm 6 foot plus and whilst it isn't "ample" it isn't bad either.

That's a shame, as while I know they have other faults legroom on other 80x I would say is ample, that was one of the most welcome developments with these. I suppose they've just managed to deal with the loss of about 2m of body per vehicle compared to other Hitachi units by squashing the seats closer together. Though the thick back of the LEAN seat (a very poor design in my view) doesn't help!
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,924
That's a shame, as while I know they have other faults legroom on other 80x I would say is ample, that was one of the most welcome developments with these. I suppose they've just managed to deal with the loss of about 2m of body per vehicle compared to other Hitachi units by squashing the seats closer together. Though the thick back of the LEAN seat (a very poor design in my view) doesn't help!
The saloon doesn't feel much if any smaller, it's the vestibules where they've saved most of the space I think. I had time at my leisure to try most of the different types of seat in both first, standard and even the cabs and galley ( :lol: ) and as a heavily built 18 stone 6 foot plus bloke I'd have no issues with any of them on a 810 journey.
 

Top