• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Opinions on Brexit

Regarding Brexit..:

  • I voted Leave and stand by that decision

    Votes: 31 14.0%
  • I voted Remain and stand by that decision

    Votes: 161 72.5%
  • I voted Leave but have changed my mind

    Votes: 7 3.2%
  • I voted Remain but have changed my mind

    Votes: 8 3.6%
  • I hold no strong opinion either way.

    Votes: 4 1.8%
  • I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled.

    Votes: 42 18.9%

  • Total voters
    222
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bspahh

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2017
Messages
2,430
At the moment the poll has these scores:
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5% I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4% I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5% I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1% I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4% I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%

Which adds up to 115.3% :s
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
9,213
Location
SE London
At the moment the poll has these scores:
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5% I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4% I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5% I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1% I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4% I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%

Which adds up to 115.3% :s

That's because you can choose more than one option. I for example picked two options that both correctly describe my views: I voted Remain but have changed my mind, and I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled.

I suspect that last option I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled, would account for almost all the multiple votes, since all the other options would appear to be logically mutually exclusive.
 

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,927
Location
First Class
At the moment the poll has these scores:
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5% I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4% I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5% I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1% I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4% I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%

Which adds up to 115.3% :s

You can vote for more than one option (the first and last being a common combination I suspect!).
 

Doppelganger

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2011
Messages
411
Agreed; it's the suggestion everything is rosy elsewhere that I'm questioning.
It isn't necessarily rosy, just not as bad. The UK economy is again sluggish at best and the UK has once again been dubbed the sick man of Europe.
 

Essan

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2017
Messages
616
Location
Evesham / Lochailort
I voted to leave the EU and would do so again. I also believe the terms of leaving the EU were handled in the most totally inept way possible, to the absolute detriment and near financial ruin of the country, by a bunch of selfish, money obsessed buffoons who collectively couldn't build a lego house even if the house comprised of 2 bricks placed on top of each other and wouldn't understand democracy even if they were taught the meaning of the word for 16 hours a day every day for 16,000 years.

(I was fully in favour of a very soft Brexit - which would have been a compromise that I think almost everyone in the country, apart from the aforementioned buffoons, would have found acceptable)
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,895
Location
UK
I voted to leave the EU and would do so again. I also believe the terms of leaving the EU were handled in the most totally inept way possible, to the absolute detriment and near financial ruin of the country, by a bunch of selfish, money obsessed buffoons who collectively couldn't build a lego house even if the house comprised of 2 bricks placed on top of each other and wouldn't understand democracy even if they were taught the meaning of the word for 16 hours a day every day for 16,000 years.

(I was fully in favour of a very soft Brexit - which would have been a compromise that I think almost everyone in the country, apart from the aforementioned buffoons, would have found acceptable)

Why do you think Brexit was managed badly? For the disaster capitalists like JRM, a hard Brexit was totally necessary. If they thought they could just leave without an agreement, or paying any moneys owed, they probably would have done that too.

But I can accept that a lot of voters didn't want or expect that, as a lot of them did say during the campaigning that we would get a soft Brexit, with frictionless trade, less paperwork and so on. The EU was going to give us everything we wanted and more because they need us more than we need them.

It's why when it came to Brexit, once it was decided to leave, there needed to be another vote to decide the type of Brexit because every voter probably had a different idea of what it would be - the only common denominator likely being to stop immigration.

It would be like me asking my family if we should get a new car or keep our current one. We agree to get a new car, so I go and buy a 2 seater sportscar. My wife then points out how all three of us can't fit and it's useless for shopping or trips, and I say 'but you agreed on getting a new car'.
 

Essan

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2017
Messages
616
Location
Evesham / Lochailort
Why do you think Brexit was managed badly?

Is there anyone who doesn't think it was managed badly? Apart from the aforementioned buffoons, has anyone benefited from the form of Brexit we got?

To say it wasn't handled badly is like saying that blowing up a nuclear power station, causing an earthquake and destroying a city isn't a bad way to stop a runaway train, giving that these were all possible means of achieving the objective. Even if most people thought there were slightly better ways of doing it.

It's why when it came to Brexit, once it was decided to leave, there needed to be another vote to decide the type of Brexit because every voter probably had a different idea of what it would be - the only common denominator likely being to stop immigration.

The problem being it stopped the economic migration we absolutely need*: seasonal workers, those undertaking more mundane, lower paid jobs; and did absolutely nothing whatsoever to stop the illegal migration that capture the headline and which some don't want.


* albeit Covid was another factor there
 

duncanp

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2012
Messages
4,856
At the moment the poll has these scores:
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5% I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4% I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5% I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1% I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4% I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%

Which adds up to 115.3% :s

People can vote for more than one option.

I think the percentages refer to the number of people who have voted.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,895
Location
UK
Is there anyone who doesn't think it was managed badly? Apart from the aforementioned buffoons, has anyone benefited from the form of Brexit we got?

To say it wasn't handled badly is like saying that blowing up a nuclear power station, causing an earthquake and destroying a city isn't a bad way to stop a runaway train, giving that these were all possible means of achieving the objective. Even if most people thought there were slightly better ways of doing it.



The problem being it stopped the economic migration we absolutely need*: seasonal workers, those undertaking more mundane, lower paid jobs; and did absolutely nothing whatsoever to stop the illegal migration that capture the headline and which some don't want.


* albeit Covid was another factor there

I am not disagreeing with you!! I am just saying that some people have done very well from Brexit - just not those who were talked into voting for it.

Brexit was a scam. As such, it went pretty much according to plan.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,817
I voted to leave the EU and would do so again. I also believe the terms of leaving the EU were handled in the most totally inept way possible, to the absolute detriment and near financial ruin of the country, by a bunch of selfish, money obsessed buffoons who collectively couldn't build a lego house even if the house comprised of 2 bricks placed on top of each other and wouldn't understand democracy even if they were taught the meaning of the word for 16 hours a day every day for 16,000 years.

(I was fully in favour of a very soft Brexit - which would have been a compromise that I think almost everyone in the country, apart from the aforementioned buffoons, would have found acceptable)

I’m interested to know what sort of Brexit you expected. Given what was very clearly at stake both for U.K. Government and the EU, I can’t see how any other form of Brexit was possible.


The problem being it stopped the economic migration we absolutely need*: seasonal workers, those undertaking more mundane, lower paid jobs; and did absolutely nothing whatsoever to stop the illegal migration that capture the headline and which some don't want.

but illegal migration wasn’t an E.U. issue, by definition.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,095
Location
Redcar
I’m interested to know what sort of Brexit you expected. Given what was very clearly at stake both for U.K. Government and the EU, I can’t see how any other form of Brexit was possible.
I'm not sure that was true until May was boxed into giving her "red lines" speech. Those red lines meant we were always going to end up with something like we've gotten. Before then I feel like a softer Brexit would have been possible (though with different actors required on the Tory side!).
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
10,501
Location
Cheshire
Is there anyone who doesn't think it was managed badly? Apart from the aforementioned buffoons, has anyone benefited from the form of Brexit we got?

To say it wasn't handled badly is like saying that blowing up a nuclear power station, causing an earthquake and destroying a city isn't a bad way to stop a runaway train, giving that these were all possible means of achieving the objective. Even if most people thought there were slightly better ways of doing it.



The problem being it stopped the economic migration we absolutely need*: seasonal workers, those undertaking more mundane, lower paid jobs; and did absolutely nothing whatsoever to stop the illegal migration that capture the headline and which some don't want.


* albeit Covid was another factor there
Is it just possible that the e it strategy the country chose was always going to be a disaster, regardless of who or how it was managed. One of the weak points of the Leave argument was what was the strategy if things didn't play out to plan? And the simple answer there wasn't one, Brexit said the Leave plan cannot fail, all it can do is make our lives better. This weakness also exposed a strategic flaw in the Remain campaign in so much that they never really pushed this point home. In the end both sides let the country down by not allowing and engaging in a much more detailed, comprehensive debate.
 

Doppelganger

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2011
Messages
411
This weakness also exposed a strategic flaw in the Remain campaign in so much that they never really pushed this point home. In the end both sides let the country down by not allowing and engaging in a much more detailed, comprehensive debate.
I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.

Project fear has now become project reality and despite all the "I told you sos" now, many still have their head buried in the sand.

We hear a lot of nonsense like, "well, we've left now anyway", again just shutting down debate, or just simply pushing the blame of issues in to COVID or the war in Ukraine. I know there are a lot of factors at play affecting the global economy, but only the UK has Brexit and this has made things worse than other places, despite what some try to spin. It is very much a boiled frog syndrome in the UK, that you can't see the wood for the trees.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,817
I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.

Project fear has now become project reality and despite all the "I told you sos" now, many still have their head buried in the sand.

We hear a lot of nonsense like, "well, we've left now anyway", again just shutting down debate, or just simply pushing the blame of issues in to COVID or the war in Ukraine. I know there are a lot of factors at play affecting the global economy, but only the UK has Brexit and this has made things worse than other places, despite what some try to spin. It is very much a boiled frog syndrome in the UK, that you can't see the wood for the trees.

Bang on sir!
 

Essan

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2017
Messages
616
Location
Evesham / Lochailort
I’m interested to know what sort of Brexit you expected. Given what was very clearly at stake both for U.K. Government and the EU, I can’t see how any other form of Brexit was possible.

One negotiated by our PM, David Cameron ...... (and ideally the soft version - which was, at the time, quite possible to achieve, and whilst maybe not what everyone wanted, also something most people wouldn't have objected too much to, and which would have had a minimal impact on people and businesses both in the UK and the rest of the EU)

I simply wanted to leave the political union (ie EU) - which was the only question on the ballot paper - which we had never been asked if we wanted to join and for which Major never had a mandate to sign up to (IMO). Nothing more. Basically a Norway option.

but illegal migration wasn’t an E.U. issue, by definition.

Exactly!
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,817
One negotiated by our PM, David Cameron ...... (and ideally the soft version - which was, at the time, quite possible to achieve, and whilst maybe not what everyone wanted, also something most people wouldn't have objected too much to, and which would have had a minimal impact on people and businesses both in the UK and the rest of the EU)

I simply wanted to leave the political union (ie EU) - which was the only question on the ballot paper - which we had never been asked if we wanted to join and for which Major never had a mandate to sign up to (IMO). Nothing more. Basically a Norway option.

Whilst an option, that was never going to happen. It would have required continued Free movement of people with the E.U. (which was obviously an issue), continued following of European Court of Justice (same) and continuing to pay into the EU at least as much, and probably more, than we did previously. (Norway pays in more per capita than we did). It would also have required the explicit consent of Norway if we were to join EFTA, and that is by no means a certainty.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,385
I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.
What the Remain campaign did not do, however, was make a positive case for remaining in the EU.
 

Essan

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2017
Messages
616
Location
Evesham / Lochailort
Whilst an option, that was never going to happen. It would have required continued Free movement of people with the E.U. (which was obviously an issue), continued following of European Court of Justice (same) and continuing to pay into the EU at least as much, and probably more, than we did previously. (Norway pays in more per capita than we did). It would also have required the explicit consent of Norway if we were to join EFTA, and that is by no means a certainty.

Maybe. I never followed the debates at the time - I voted purely on a matter of principle and never actually expected the vote to go the way it did (and whether, given the narrow margin, we should have even proceeded to leave, or had a second vote once the terms of leaving had been agreed, is a moot point.) Stopping the free movement of people was not an issue for me - indeed, I'd be fully in favour of resuming it.

For what it's worth, I'm not aware leaving has really affected me (personally) much anyway. And there still seem to be plenty of Polish and other East Europeans living in my town. Though maybe not as many as we need.
 

Doppelganger

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2011
Messages
411
What the Remain campaign did not do, however, was make a positive case for remaining in the EU.
No? See below image.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

there still seem to be plenty of Polish and other East Europeans living in my town. Though maybe not as many as we need.
My bold. What do you mean by this exactly?
 

Attachments

  • what-has-europe (1).jpg
    what-has-europe (1).jpg
    427.4 KB · Views: 36
Last edited:

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,927
Location
First Class
I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.

Project fear has now become project reality and despite all the "I told you sos" now, many still have their head buried in the sand.

We hear a lot of nonsense like, "well, we've left now anyway", again just shutting down debate, or just simply pushing the blame of issues in to COVID or the war in Ukraine. I know there are a lot of factors at play affecting the global economy, but only the UK has Brexit and this has made things worse than other places, despite what some try to spin. It is very much a boiled frog syndrome in the UK, that you can't see the wood for the trees.

Brexit was a bump in the road in comparison to our catastrophic Covid response, and indeed the war in Ukraine. Remember the (effectively stillborn) Spring 2020 budget? Whilst the manner of Brexit was not in my opinion ideal, there was plenty to be positive about.

We’re never going to agree on this. You enjoy your “I told you so” moment, it won’t last! :)
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,817
Brexit was a bump in the road in comparison to our catastrophic Covid response,

with the benefit of hindsight (and a couple of years), our Covid response was little different to most other developed countries, right or wrong though it was. We locked down a little later than most, and a little more leniently, vaccinated a little earlier, and reopened a little earlier than most developed countries. In broad comparison, given what happened, it’s much of a muchness. Similarly Ukraine has hit us broadly the same as other European countries, and perhaps we have had it easier as we do at least have some of our own gas.

on a baseline, then, that the impact of Covid and Ukraine on us is broadly the same as the rest of Europe, the fact that we are performing worse than the other main European economies must be due to something else. And that something else is Brexit.

I too would like to know what positives there are, as there were none identified beforehand, and I have seen none that have happened since. But I’m willing to learn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top