Doppelganger
Member
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2011
- Messages
- 411
Yeah, who trusts experts anyway?I’d take that with a pinch of salt to be honest. Personally I think it’s IMF wishful thinking!
Yeah, who trusts experts anyway?I’d take that with a pinch of salt to be honest. Personally I think it’s IMF wishful thinking!
Yeah, who trusts experts anyway?
Whatever the projections, our current growth rate is absolutely abysmal…I’d take that with a pinch of salt to be honest. Personally I think it’s IMF wishful thinking!
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5%
I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4%
I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5%
I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1%
I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4%
I believe Brexit could have been
beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%Whatever the projections, our current growth rate is absolutely abysmal…
At the moment the poll has these scores:
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5% I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4% I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5% I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1% I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4% I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%
Which adds up to 115.3%![]()
At the moment the poll has these scores:
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5% I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4% I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5% I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1% I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4% I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%
Which adds up to 115.3%![]()
It isn't necessarily rosy, just not as bad. The UK economy is again sluggish at best and the UK has once again been dubbed the sick man of Europe.Agreed; it's the suggestion everything is rosy elsewhere that I'm questioning.
I voted to leave the EU and would do so again. I also believe the terms of leaving the EU were handled in the most totally inept way possible, to the absolute detriment and near financial ruin of the country, by a bunch of selfish, money obsessed buffoons who collectively couldn't build a lego house even if the house comprised of 2 bricks placed on top of each other and wouldn't understand democracy even if they were taught the meaning of the word for 16 hours a day every day for 16,000 years.
(I was fully in favour of a very soft Brexit - which would have been a compromise that I think almost everyone in the country, apart from the aforementioned buffoons, would have found acceptable)
Why do you think Brexit was managed badly?
It's why when it came to Brexit, once it was decided to leave, there needed to be another vote to decide the type of Brexit because every voter probably had a different idea of what it would be - the only common denominator likely being to stop immigration.
At the moment the poll has these scores:
I voted Leave and stand by that decision Votes: 23 13.5% I voted Remain and stand by that decision Votes: 123 72.4% I voted Leave but have changed my mind Votes: 6 3.5% I voted Remain but have changed my mind Votes: 7 4.1% I hold no strong opinion either way. Votes: 4 2.4% I believe Brexit could have been beneficial but has been mishandled. Votes: 33 19.4%
Which adds up to 115.3%![]()
Is there anyone who doesn't think it was managed badly? Apart from the aforementioned buffoons, has anyone benefited from the form of Brexit we got?
To say it wasn't handled badly is like saying that blowing up a nuclear power station, causing an earthquake and destroying a city isn't a bad way to stop a runaway train, giving that these were all possible means of achieving the objective. Even if most people thought there were slightly better ways of doing it.
The problem being it stopped the economic migration we absolutely need*: seasonal workers, those undertaking more mundane, lower paid jobs; and did absolutely nothing whatsoever to stop the illegal migration that capture the headline and which some don't want.
* albeit Covid was another factor there
Exactly right.Brexit was a scam. As such, it went pretty much according to plan.
I voted to leave the EU and would do so again. I also believe the terms of leaving the EU were handled in the most totally inept way possible, to the absolute detriment and near financial ruin of the country, by a bunch of selfish, money obsessed buffoons who collectively couldn't build a lego house even if the house comprised of 2 bricks placed on top of each other and wouldn't understand democracy even if they were taught the meaning of the word for 16 hours a day every day for 16,000 years.
(I was fully in favour of a very soft Brexit - which would have been a compromise that I think almost everyone in the country, apart from the aforementioned buffoons, would have found acceptable)
The problem being it stopped the economic migration we absolutely need*: seasonal workers, those undertaking more mundane, lower paid jobs; and did absolutely nothing whatsoever to stop the illegal migration that capture the headline and which some don't want.
I'm not sure that was true until May was boxed into giving her "red lines" speech. Those red lines meant we were always going to end up with something like we've gotten. Before then I feel like a softer Brexit would have been possible (though with different actors required on the Tory side!).I’m interested to know what sort of Brexit you expected. Given what was very clearly at stake both for U.K. Government and the EU, I can’t see how any other form of Brexit was possible.
Is it just possible that the e it strategy the country chose was always going to be a disaster, regardless of who or how it was managed. One of the weak points of the Leave argument was what was the strategy if things didn't play out to plan? And the simple answer there wasn't one, Brexit said the Leave plan cannot fail, all it can do is make our lives better. This weakness also exposed a strategic flaw in the Remain campaign in so much that they never really pushed this point home. In the end both sides let the country down by not allowing and engaging in a much more detailed, comprehensive debate.Is there anyone who doesn't think it was managed badly? Apart from the aforementioned buffoons, has anyone benefited from the form of Brexit we got?
To say it wasn't handled badly is like saying that blowing up a nuclear power station, causing an earthquake and destroying a city isn't a bad way to stop a runaway train, giving that these were all possible means of achieving the objective. Even if most people thought there were slightly better ways of doing it.
The problem being it stopped the economic migration we absolutely need*: seasonal workers, those undertaking more mundane, lower paid jobs; and did absolutely nothing whatsoever to stop the illegal migration that capture the headline and which some don't want.
* albeit Covid was another factor there
I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.This weakness also exposed a strategic flaw in the Remain campaign in so much that they never really pushed this point home. In the end both sides let the country down by not allowing and engaging in a much more detailed, comprehensive debate.
I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.
Project fear has now become project reality and despite all the "I told you sos" now, many still have their head buried in the sand.
We hear a lot of nonsense like, "well, we've left now anyway", again just shutting down debate, or just simply pushing the blame of issues in to COVID or the war in Ukraine. I know there are a lot of factors at play affecting the global economy, but only the UK has Brexit and this has made things worse than other places, despite what some try to spin. It is very much a boiled frog syndrome in the UK, that you can't see the wood for the trees.
I’m interested to know what sort of Brexit you expected. Given what was very clearly at stake both for U.K. Government and the EU, I can’t see how any other form of Brexit was possible.
but illegal migration wasn’t an E.U. issue, by definition.
One negotiated by our PM, David Cameron ...... (and ideally the soft version - which was, at the time, quite possible to achieve, and whilst maybe not what everyone wanted, also something most people wouldn't have objected too much to, and which would have had a minimal impact on people and businesses both in the UK and the rest of the EU)
I simply wanted to leave the political union (ie EU) - which was the only question on the ballot paper - which we had never been asked if we wanted to join and for which Major never had a mandate to sign up to (IMO). Nothing more. Basically a Norway option.
What the Remain campaign did not do, however, was make a positive case for remaining in the EU.I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.
Whilst an option, that was never going to happen. It would have required continued Free movement of people with the E.U. (which was obviously an issue), continued following of European Court of Justice (same) and continuing to pay into the EU at least as much, and probably more, than we did previously. (Norway pays in more per capita than we did). It would also have required the explicit consent of Norway if we were to join EFTA, and that is by no means a certainty.
No? See below image.What the Remain campaign did not do, however, was make a positive case for remaining in the EU.
My bold. What do you mean by this exactly?there still seem to be plenty of Polish and other East Europeans living in my town. Though maybe not as many as we need.
I don't agree. The remain campaign made a lot of the consequences very clear, but Brexiteers dismissed it all as project fear.
Project fear has now become project reality and despite all the "I told you sos" now, many still have their head buried in the sand.
We hear a lot of nonsense like, "well, we've left now anyway", again just shutting down debate, or just simply pushing the blame of issues in to COVID or the war in Ukraine. I know there are a lot of factors at play affecting the global economy, but only the UK has Brexit and this has made things worse than other places, despite what some try to spin. It is very much a boiled frog syndrome in the UK, that you can't see the wood for the trees.

Please tell us what to be positive about, as this has been asked so many times and nothing tangible has been presented.Whilst the manner of Brexit was not in my opinion ideal, there was plenty to be positive about.
Not the general thrust of the campaign, and I'm fairly sure a lot of those are covered by separate UK legislation anyway.No? See below image.
Brexit was a bump in the road in comparison to our catastrophic Covid response,