Runningaround
Member
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2022
- Messages
- 799
If it gets left and ignored for 200 years it'll be considered historic and get preserved.
"PRINCESS ANNE IS ALREADY MARRIED TO VALERIE SINGLETON".Graffiti isn't what it used to be!
You can paint them, I'm sure some Graffiti artists would welcome a Network Rail Painter and Decorators Apprenticeship."PRINCESS ANNE IS ALREADY MARRIED TO VALERIE SINGLETON".
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Can you dye concrete before pouring/casting? A new bridge coloured green or brown in a rural setting might not be so obtrusive. Or more interesting in other colours in a city center.
That's the stuff I think SHOULD be tagged. Motorways are endless lines of concrete. Any tag or 'art piece' is better than a plain grey or white wall.The most annoying is the crap that gets put on motorway bridges, some of which, as I recall from a few years ago, was pasted up on posters by some sort of religious cult.
I guess graffiti is just another annoyance we have to tolerate, a bit like fly tipping and litter dropping.
I disagree, plain grey or white is much better than most graffiti.That's the stuff I think SHOULD be tagged. Motorways are endless lines of concrete. Any tag or 'art piece' is better than a plain grey or white wall.
As for Banksy, I think he does good work...
The problem is that it will not get as far as a judge, just a magistrate.Sadly even if the vandals get caught, they know they won't receive a meaningful punishment by the time they go in front of a judge.
Yes you can based on collective public opinion, in the same way someone can be labelled attractive or ugly (some people are much better at attracting the opposite sex than others), scenery can be said to be beautiful or ugly (why is the Scottish highlands a popular place to visit for both UK and overseas tourists?), and someone can be labeled a nice or unpleasant person (e.g. Princess Diana and Harold Shipman). If Banksy did not have such talent and his graffiti/artwork was not outstanding he would not have been able to stimulate the public to the extent he has managed, and his artwork would not have significant monetary value attached to it. Things that stimulate positive emotions tend to be seen as good, and vice versa.The trouble is, you really can't differentiate between 'good' grafitti and the rest of it, as it's entirely subjective. It remains vandalism and criminal damage, that doesn't change based on the finished result or the identity of the vandal.
Probably not desirable to have graffiti on motorway bridges which could distract drivers.I disagree, plain grey or white is much better than most graffiti.
I disagree; you can't differentiate on the principle - it is all vandalism, and it is all illeagal, and I don't think we really want to be deciding by subjective opinion which acts of vandalism should be celebrated and which should be washed off!Yes you can based on collective public opinion, in the same way someone can be labelled attractive or ugly (some people are much better at attracting the opposite sex than others), scenery can be said to be beautiful or ugly (why is the Scottish highlands a popular place to visit for both UK and overseas tourists?), and someone can be labeled a nice or unpleasant person (e.g. Princess Diana and Harold Shipman). If Banksy did not have such talent and his graffiti/artwork was not outstanding he would not have been able to stimulate the public to the extent he has managed, and his artwork would not have significant monetary value attached to it. Things that stimulate positive emotions tend to be seen as good, and vice versa.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Probably not desirable to have graffiti on motorway bridges which could distract drivers.
Far away is close at hand in images of elsewhere was written on a wall outside Paddington in the 1970s and stayed there for several years before demolition. It was recreated in the 1990s.
Not helped by the media that appears to have put Banksy on some sort of pedestal.gullible folk stopped falling for the Banksy nonsense that would also help!![]()
Couldn't agree more.Not helped by the media that appears to have put Banksy on some sort of pedestal.
It is about time this individual was identified and prosecuted. His/her works should not be given a cash value as they now appear to attract.
Far away is close at hand in images of elsewhere was written on a wall outside Paddington in the 1970s and stayed there for several years before demolition. It was recreated in the 1990s.
Tag is just a tag; usually some alpha-numerical combined symbol showing the 'street' ID of the taggee. Nothing artistic at all imho, and a long way from satirical drawings of Banksie et al.This opinion might not go down too well, but I like seeing all the trackside graffiti on the railways around London. I think it brightens the place up and provides added interest to a journey. That said, I don't condone breaking the law, and before anyone says it - if someone came and sprayed a tag on my house I wouldn't like it... unless it was Banksy in which case I'd sell it!
Fixed it for you. Shame I couldn’t actually edit your post in situ as that’s what vandalism is.Similar feeling here. I advocate the vandalism of property.
One thing we can do as enthusiasts is not to share pictures of tagged trains on social media. Don't give those who do the graffiti "the oxygen of publicity".
What makes you think they are teenagers? From what I have read many appear to be considerably older. There are also groups who travel the world to indulge their criminality.I think that the problem we are talking about here is late-1970s New York pop-art - which came across the Atlantic in the mid-1980s - as opposed to simple graffiti at one extreme and traditional, commissioned artwork at the other. And it has never gone away. I guess that we'll just have to lump it together with rap 'music', baseball caps worn back-to-front, torn jeans, men with earrings, silly haircuts, black American speech patterns, skateboards, BMX bikes and, catching up fast, the hoodie. The simple fact is that 21st century teenagers are too stupid to think of original means of rebelling against society.
How does local authority authorised or funded "graffiti" / "street art" / etc fit into an inability to differentiate?The trouble is, you really can't differentiate between 'good' grafitti and the rest of it, as it's entirely subjective. It remains vandalism and criminal damage, that doesn't change based on the finished result or the identity of the vandal.
As for Banksy, ugghh....
You're right - I was astounded when I read about blokes in their 20s and 30s - who presumably think that they're actually in late-1970s New York - being arrested for this. But I can't believe that the 'pros' are responsible for all the tagging in smaller provincial cities and towns - it has got to be kids imitating them.What makes you think they are teenagers? From what I have read many appear to be considerably older. There are also groups who travel the world to indulge their criminality.
Magistrates can still send people to prison, but it’s not unusual for railway graffiti cases to go to the Crown Court, e.g. this one in London and this one on Wales. Given it’s a non-violent offence with a corporate victim (both of which typically mean offences are seen as less serious), the courts take railway graffiti cases fairly seriously.The problem is that it will not get as far as a judge, just a magistrate.