martybabes
Member
it sets a precedent
How, exactly, does it do this?
How, exactly, does it do this?
Wow, I had no idea they were still using Absolute Block in the Stockport area!
So a passenger turns up with a valid ticket that she mistakenly believes limits her to one particular train, and she is obviously confused (as are many, even on this board) - you are saying that an RPI (or whatever member of staff was approached by her) would only take any notice of her if she was a fare-dodger. Welcome to customer service, railways style!Ill have to watch it again on iPlayer then.
But the point still stands, if she had any other ticket other than one that required a compulsory seat reservation, i.e. an AP ticket then the TM would not have acted in such a way that she did, nor by asking the TM that as she had muddled up when she was to travel if she could go on that service. We all know RPIs and they just dont normally do such a thing as, with the posts above about the alleged stolen ticket, it sets a precedent that VT will aloow you to do anything which is patently not true.
RPI to Platform Dispatch and that woman reckoned it was a promotion? Surely a drop in pay?
I thought the RPI asked to see her ticket and then noticed the time was wrong.. But if it was an Off Peak then she wouldve been told to wait for the next off peak service after 1900 rather than be put on the train so I think its fair to say that it had to have been an advance purchase. And if it was an anytime ticket then there would not have been any need for her to ask the TM to let her on.


He was also very helpful to the driver bearing in mind that he was asked to confirm the rotation test where in fact the role of the guard is a fraction of the responsibility it used to be. Good on him I say I thought he was a competent member of his team and carried out his duties well!
it sets a precedent
How, exactly, does it do this?
So a passenger turns up with a valid ticket that she mistakenly believes limits her to one particular train, and she is obviously confused (as are many, even on this board) - you are saying that an RPI (or whatever member of staff was approached by her) would only take any notice of her if she was a fare-dodger. Welcome to customer service, railways style!
A lot of people with flexible tickets aren't aware that they can travel on trains other than the one they have reserved a seat on! Certainly when I worked in the Customer Information Point, a lot of people with Anytime/Off Peak tickets asked the question. With the CIP at Euston, the vast majority of queries are from passengers asking which platform their train is going from, often when it's the only one on the boards not yet showing as it's not ready for boarding. It's true that a lot of people don't bother saying thank you, but that's just the way people are - you get used to it before long. It's a rewarding job anyway, especially people say things like "you're a credit to the UK and should be an ambassador"![]()
Thank you. At least someone seems to understand what im on about.I agree with Clip. If the passenger had a walk-up ticket with a non-mandatory seat reservation, then surely all that is needed to be said was that the passenger is not obliged to take the "booked" service. There would only be the need to discuss this with the TM if the passenger's ticket wouldn't normally be accepted. This leads me to believe it was an AP ticket.
.

As expected, lots of negative and pedantic posts about tonights programme just like the last 3 weeks!
One thing though, I dont understand how that rotation test thing they did on the Pendo caused a whole hour of delay! If someone could explain please do![]()
Perhaps your reply was itself a little confused. However, I do apologise, as I meant to frame my remark as a question....
Youre getting confused with what you thought I was I said to what I actually said, this doesnt surprise me. I never said she would only take notice of her if she was a fare dodger at all so dont make things up. Read the reply above to the other person I quoted.
No it doesn't - it implies merely that she was trying to help a passenger who was flustered and possibly getting more so. If she had said "Come along, I'll see what I can do to find you an unreserved seat" it would still fit the situation.... she said 'Ill see what I can do'. That implies the ticket was not valid for any other service apart from the one the reservation was for. ..
I am well aware of all the questions posed and asked by passengers with tickets that could be valid to send them to Mars thank you. Again that is not what I was getting at nor what I was saying.
As you have worked in the industry then you know EXACTLY what your answer would be to someone who came up to you with a ticket that was valid. The scene in question showed that it was not valid which is why the RPI went to ask the TM if they could travel on a service different to what was on her reservation.
As you well know the answer anyone wouldve given her wouldve been one that told her you can get on that train or even if off peak/super off peak one that was valid at that time NOT one that said, let me see what I can do for you as if you were going out your way.
Im struggling to understand why some of you cant seem to grasp this.
Thank you. At least someone seems to understand what im on about.
I kid you not - I have just made myself a bowl of popcorn!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Steals FC ticket, sits in standard.
And that doesn't raise suspicion?
I also get the impression that the editors have looked at the shots of trains accelerating and decelerating that they have - and just put a random noise with it!
I've heard a 350 at Piccadilly, a 323 noise for a 185 and a Pendolio at Euston sounding like a diesel!
No it doesn't - it implies merely that she was trying to help a passenger who was flustered and possibly getting more so. If she had said "Come along, I'll see what I can do to find you an unreserved seat" it would still fit the situation
Sorry, I misread your post. When you said "if it was an anytime ticket then there would not have been any need for her to ask the TM to let her on," I mistakenly thought you were talking about the passenger, didn't realise you were talking about the RPO.
E2A: I was surprised at the flags; I've only ever seen people waving flags to despatch trains at heritage railways or railtours. I thought that all modern trains had communication bells/buzzers, making flag waving (and whistle blowing, for that matter) unnecessary.
No, it wouldnt. They do not do this. The woman didnt seem to be getting anymore flustered then she already was because she doesnt know how to read a clock time. She is an RPI, by her very nature she is there to stop people getting on the train because her ticket is not valid. They do this everyday and as yet I have NEVER seen them let anyone through like that and have ALWAYS made them buy a new ticket.
I can't understand why the lad even bothered to steal a ticket when he already had one, albeit without the necessary railcard. By sitting in standard he was obviously in no position to plead ownership of the first class stolen one, and just added theft to a presumably lesser punishable ticket offence.
The bit that made me wish for a little more compassion was the young woman missing the last train of the night because "the doors shut two minutes before departure", even though it was still in the station. I know absolutely nothing about pre-departure routines, but given her plight and the time of night I thought just possibly they could have allowed her to dash for it.
The footy fans stampede was a joke if ticket checks were allegedly being done on boarding. Not a hope. Also given the overcrowding it's unlikely they were checked on the journey.
I can't understand why the lad even bothered to steal a ticket when he already had one, albeit without the necessary railcard. By sitting in standard he was obviously in no position to plead ownership of the first class stolen one, and just added theft to a presumably lesser punishable ticket offence.
The bit that made me wish for a little more compassion was the young woman missing the last train of the night because "the doors shut two minutes before departure", even though it was still in the station. I know absolutely nothing about pre-departure routines, but given her plight and the time of night I thought just possibly they could have allowed her to dash for it.
The footy fans stampede was a joke if ticket checks were allegedly being done on boarding. Not a hope. Also given the overcrowding it's unlikely they were checked on the journey.
The train manager's idea for all the drunks returning to Liverpool was fantastic. Turn up the heating, dim the lights... and there all zzzzzzzzz![]()
It's a pity I can't manipulate the temperature in the passenger saloons of 450s, otherwise my Friday and Saturday nights would be so much more pleasant! An excellent episode all round. I think the criticism of the TM is wrong. We, as guards, and all customer facing roles on the industry, are trained in conflict avoidance, and to go in all guns blazing, like he said, is asking for trouble. OK yes, he should have called the BTP, BUT we don't know the full story after the man left the train do we? He might have called ahead to Crewe to warn them? He might have phone retail control giving a description of the man, so that a broadcast could be sent to all TM's on the route?
They've also reversed the footage to get the psychologically "positive" left to right movement as seen with the Northern Leeds 158 at the beginning (all the driving controls were on the right).
We still do it out of Man Vic/Man Pic and Man Airport. Its the method of work for many years!
Why? Why not just use the buzzer like most other places? (I'm not trying to pick holes in the rulebook or anything here, I'm just interested to know why these stations require the use of flags)
Do you not see that throwing somebody off in those circumstances is NOT conflict avoidance, and sooner or later will lead to precisely the opposite?!