61653 HTAFC
Veteran Member
You can't have it both ways though. The 229 was diverted away from Batley a few years ago because of congestion, were the timings on the modified route updated? If the timetable is too conservative in one place and too optimistic further along the route, then it isn't fit for purpose. Yes, sometimes traffic can be unpredictable but for the most part you know when and where the bottlenecks are likely to be. At least with modern tracking people will know whether their bus is delayed or if it's a no-show- which wasn't the case in the past. That's assuming things are tracking properly of course, which isn't always the case.No.
You can predict you can have traffic at peaks times but you cannot predict how long that traffic will disrupt the journey. Arriva has far too much padding in their timetables to the point where you are consistently waiting 5+ minutes at every timing point on routes like the 202/3 and 229. Yet, despite this, these services are still the most unpunctual services in the region and still end up running half an hour late. You cannot fix infrastructure issues with timetables.
People will accept that their bus might be late because of traffic, particularly if they're able to track it and be reassured that it will turn up eventually- but would it not make more sense to publish timetables that bear at least some resemblance to reality? It isn't rocket science to acknowledge that the roads will be quieter at 9pm than they were at 5:30pm and to publish timetables that reflect this.