Video posted of a train coming to a halt at West Malling whilst a fire onboard from what it appears.
Very scary situation but glad everyone got off safe.
I like the bloke who gets off with his bags and wanders off fairly chilled while all around him are running about.
Another F1 car bites the dust?Fire was in / underneath the bogie. Looks electrical to me.
Fire was in / underneath the bogie. Looks electrical to me.
The train involved has been moved to Maidstone East and is blocking platform 2 meaning Ashford bound trains running non stop through the centre track.
Lucky we have an F1 engineer to hand, is the damage particularly severe?Shoe gear burn up. A relatively common occurrence in 3rd rail land, impact damage/shorting from track debris or could be a build up of dirt on the shoe gear and beam which shorts across the shoe beam to vehicle body and sets fire to the beam and cables.
Shoe gear burn up. A relatively common occurrence in 3rd rail land, impact damage/shorting from track debris or could be a build up of dirt on the shoe gear and beam which shorts across the shoe beam to vehicle body and sets fire to the beam and cables.
At least in the heat it doesn't sag, causing everything to effectively stop. And a carrier bag won't kill it, nor will a bit of bouncing bring it all down and ruin the day...But the third rail system is much more reliable, according to some!
At least in the heat it doesn't sag, causing everything to effectively stop.
And a carrier bag won't kill it,
nor will a bit of bouncing bring it all down and ruin the day...
it can do, and does.
At least in the heat it doesn't sag, causing everything to effectively stop. And a carrier bag won't kill it, nor will a bit of bouncing bring it all down and ruin the day...
The only circumstances in which third rail is always unambiguously better that OLE are:Actually, it does (buckle and displace, rather than sag). Happens frequently. In the cold too. Several times this year, quite disruptively, too.
it can do, and does.
pit can do, and does (displacement again…)
Yes - 466 028 was the one affected; I believe it was coupled to 465 923 which was undamaged?466028
Despite the constant occurrence of “this train is cancelled due to damage to the overhead wires” I have never once in my life seen a train cancelled due to damage to the third rail. The only circumstance I’ve seen where the third rail fails is ice and that is unavoidable.The only circumstances in which third rail is always unambiguously better that OLE are:
- Very high winds (although both are equally likely to be disrupted by flying trampolines, etc)
- Tunnels/bridges with extremely limited overhead clearance
Brian May will be demanding all 3rd rail gets scrapped now3. Killing Badgers
Definitely does happen on third rail as well. I'd be interested to see the relative figures for delay minutes between the two though.Despite the constant occurrence of “this train is cancelled due to damage to the overhead wires” I have never once in my life seen a train cancelled due to damage to the third rail. The only circumstance I’ve seen where the third rail fails is ice and that is unavoidable.
Despite the constant occurrence of “this train is cancelled due to damage to the overhead wires” I have never once in my life seen a train cancelled due to damage to the third rail. The only circumstance I’ve seen where the third rail fails is ice and that is unavoidable.
At least in the heat it doesn't sag, causing everything to effectively stop. And a carrier bag won't kill it, nor will a bit of bouncing bring it all down and ruin the day...
Despite the constant occurrence of “this train is cancelled due to damage to the overhead wires” I have never once in my life seen a train cancelled due to damage to the third rail. The only circumstance I’ve seen where the third rail fails is ice and that is unavoidable.
Anybody been able to work out how to do a per passenger-km analysis between the two systems yet?You probably haven’t been looking in the right place. Numerous incidents this year alone.