• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

WAG express via Wrexham, WAG statement today

Status
Not open for further replies.

jones_bangor

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2011
Messages
856
Doubling the line Wrexham to Saltney is the key,most people want to travel to or via Chester not Shotton, which they already can,
I can never see a link at Shotton, or the need for one. Third rail into Liverpool would make more sense on this line in my opinion

I suppose it's a question of WAG priorities. It is the WAG Express issue that has brought the single line section between Saltney and Chester into sharp focus - taking some of the traffic away from that section AND significantly shortening HH - CC journey times seems like a win win to me! The Wrexham - Bidston line is hardly busy, so plenty of capacity there, with a new stop at Buckley.

I'm sure the new minister will have their own views on the best solution after the election. There may not even be WAG Express after the election and hence no problem anyway?

RE: possible objections - could be an issue, but the cyclepath could easily be relocated at modest costs.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Gareth Marston

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2010
Messages
6,231
Location
Newtown Montgomeryshire
I suppose it's a question of WAG priorities. It is the WAG Express issue that has brought the single line section between Saltney and Chester into sharp focus - taking some of the traffic away from that section AND significantly shortening HH - CC journey times seems like a win win to me! The Wrexham - Bidston line is hardly busy, so plenty of capacity there, with a new stop at Buckley.

I'm sure the new minister will have their own views on the best solution after the election. There may not even be WAG Express after the election and hence no problem anyway?

RE: possible objections - could be an issue, but the cyclepath could easily be relocated at modest costs.


Judging by last weeks trip over it NR are going to spending money relaying from Saltney to Rosset anyway- awful TSR near Balderton felt the train dip.
 

merlodlliw

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
5,852
Location
Wrexham/ Denbighshire /Flintshire triangle
I suppose it's a question of WAG priorities. It is the WAG Express issue that has brought the single line section between Saltney and Chester into sharp focus - taking some of the traffic away from that section AND significantly shortening HH - CC journey times seems like a win win to me! The Wrexham - Bidston line is hardly busy, so plenty of capacity there, with a new stop at Buckley.

I'm sure the new minister will have their own views on the best solution after the election. There may not even be WAG Express after the election and hence no problem anyway?

RE: possible objections - could be an issue, but the cyclepath could easily be relocated at modest costs.

The new Minister is stuck with WAG Ex 2 & Wagair, the outgoing Minister as seen to that, unless £Ms are paid in compensation to ATW & Airline booked to run for years. Wag Ex 1 "Gerald" is on a years contract only.
I agree this Wag Ex situation as brought the single line more in focus, but it was due for work previous,it is a pinch point on the North South route.

Taking any trains away from Chester, is just not going to occur,after the semi doubling, there will still remain a single track up Gresford Bank to General Station about two miles,this runs over the Wrexham Expressway on the bridge that can not be doubled.

In the end all that is going to happen with WAG2 is go back ten years when Wales & Borders ran a Holyhead service to Cardiff via Wrexham, this ran non stop Shrewsbury to Hereford, the May timetabled 175 is no quicker. I used the old service ex Wrexham 0740 arrive Cardiff 1005



Bob
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top