• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ukraine-Where will it end?

Status
Not open for further replies.

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,047
Sure but that depends if the Russians are over their hangovers before midday :lol: ;)

Well I'm sure after a few Pink Gins on the RN side they'd all be the best of pals and be wondering what all the fuss was about:)

And I'm sure the last thing they would want to do is take on the succesors of the the men who braved the North Cape to bring them vital supplies 70 years ago.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/02/us-ukraine-crisis-breedlove-idUSBREA310PP20140402

Russia has massed all the forces it needs on Ukraine's border if it were to decide to carry out an "incursion" into the country, and it could achieve its objective in three to five days, NATO's top military commander said on Wednesday.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCABREA360TI20140407

KIEV/DONETSK, Ukraine (Reuters) - Pro-Moscow protesters occupying a government building in eastern Ukraine declared the creation of a separatist republic on Monday, in a move Kiev described as part of a plan to justify a Russian invasion to dismember the country.
The new Ukrainian leader is blaming the uprisings in Eastern Ukraine on Russian interference which is propaganda, he's trying to push NATO into a conflict on his behalf.
NATO won't get involved in a shooting war in Ukraine.
 
Last edited:

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/02/us-ukraine-crisis-breedlove-idUSBREA310PP20140402

--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCABREA360TI20140407

The new Ukrainian leader is blaming the uprisings in Eastern Ukraine on Russian interference which is propaganda, he's trying to push NATO into a conflict on his behalf.
NATO won't get involved in a shooting war in Ukraine.

So, anything which supports your opinion is truth, and anything which doesn't is propaganda.

That doesn't sound like a biased opinion at all, does it.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Putin says he's concerned about the rights of the Russian Speaking Ukrainians and has deliberately encouraged the illegal action in the Crimea BUT he won't allow Chechens to have full independence not to mention the fact that Abkhazia, Adjara and South Ossetia are part of Georgia but rather then then Russia staying out of a internal conflict OR acting as peacekeepers decided to go in and take on Georgia.

Personally what should have happened is Russia should have sent in a peacekeeping force as part of a larger UN initiative in the Crimea.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,269
Location
Yorkshire
Anyone here still supporting the Russians? If so, are you aware of how they treat reporters?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27030365

Ukraine crisis: Pro-Russian mob attack in Donetsk

The confrontation in eastern Ukraine worsened on Monday with more official buildings seized by pro-Russian activists.

Russia and the West are accusing each other of fomenting the crisis which has now spread to at least ten cities.

Ukraine says it has asked for UN peacekeepers, but Russia holds a veto on their deployment.

Gabriel Gatehouse reports from Donetsk in eastern Ukraine for BBC Newsnight, where journalists - including a BBC team - have been targeted.
Does anyone have a list of Russian produce, so I can boycott them? :p

And no, I am not on the side of the Nazis, but the logic that if you're pro-EU you must be pro-Nazi is an absurd logic. The loony left and the far right are both utterly despicable.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,402
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Since that matter of those people in pro-Russian "soviet" in Donetsk in the eastern part of Ukraine saying that they will not observe the terms of the agreement that was reached, it will be now interesting to see how Russia will now react to this state of affairs, as the ball is well and truly in their court.
 

reb0118

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Jan 2010
Messages
3,579
Location
Bo'ness, West Lothian
Kennedy did not appear to think so......

The Kennedy family was no friend to Britain - too pro Irish Republicanism! Anyway the Americans were no real friends to us after the war by forcing Britain (and other European nations) into giving up their colonies too hastily. Decolonisation should have happened but much more slowly than it did. It would have been fairer all round if a strong democratic framework was in place as independence approached each colony in turn.

All that the Americans gained was squalid little wars in far off lands to fight the spread of communism that they themselves vicariously propagated by their earlier policies.

p.s I actually like the Americans as people - it is just some of their policy decisions that lack understanding.
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
Maybe not invading other countries and making them colonies in the first place might have been a good idea.
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
Maybe not invading other countries and making them colonies in the first place might have been a good idea.

I'm not sure there's much point ascribing moral agency to a country. British people in the 1950s had to deal with the geopolitical situation they were given. You can't blame them for it.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,402
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
The Kennedy family was no friend to Britain - too pro Irish Republicanism! Anyway the Americans were no real friends to us after the war by forcing Britain (and other European nations) into giving up their colonies too hastily. Decolonisation should have happened but much more slowly than it did. It would have been fairer all round if a strong democratic framework was in place as independence approached each colony in turn.

All that the Americans gained was squalid little wars in far off lands to fight the spread of communism that they themselves vicariously propagated by their earlier policies.

p.s I actually like the Americans as people - it is just some of their policy decisions that lack understanding.

I was not making reference to the American view of matters regarding Britain at the time of the Cuban missile crisis, as it was not British ships but those of the Russian flag that were heading towards Cuba with missiles loaded aboard the vessels.
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
I'm not sure there's much point ascribing moral agency to a country. British people in the 1950s had to deal with the geopolitical situation they were given. You can't blame them for it.

European countries in general don't come out the last few centuries with a great deal of honour.
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
European countries in general don't come out the last few centuries with a great deal of honour.

Read my post again. You're still doing it.

It makes no sense to consider a country a homogeneous moral entity over hundreds of years.
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
Read my post again. You're still doing it.

It makes no sense to consider a country a homogeneous moral entity over hundreds of years.

Read the "Niall Ferguson" stuff a hundred times over.
Personally i think it's wrong.
Nation states don't have morals nor does a warship.
But people or should i say leaders, kings and queens do or don't.
For about the first 400 years the Royal Navy was a state run pirate outfit.
It's high level allowed theft by any standards.
See European empires for details.

For western Europeans to tick off Putin is laughable.
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
...
For western Europeans to tick off Putin is laughable.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of colonial histories, the fact remains that Putin is acting today, in a world context of today's international law, to which he, and his country, have committed themselves. His apologists should answer that, and the fact they seem to have to dig back into earlier centuries even to attempt to do so show they know that they have no real case.
 

St Rollox

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2013
Messages
650
Whatever the rights and wrongs of colonial histories, the fact remains that Putin is acting today, in a world context of today's international law, to which he, and his country, have committed themselves. His apologists should answer that, and the fact they seem to have to dig back into earlier centuries even to attempt to do so show they know that they have no real case.

I'm still to be convinced that Russia is the "bad guy" in any of this.
I never picked them as an enemy, some western leaders did.

Under international law Bush and Blair might be on trial going by the West's own code for invading Iraq etc.

Good for the gander and all that.
 
Last edited:

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
Read the "Niall Ferguson" stuff a hundred times over.
Personally i think it's wrong.
Nation states don't have morals nor does a warship.
But people or should i say leaders, kings and queens do or don't.
For about the first 400 years the Royal Navy was a state run pirate outfit.
It's high level allowed theft by any standards.
See European empires for details.

For western Europeans to tick off Putin is laughable.

You're completely missing my point. No-one from Britain was alive when the Royal Navy was a "pirate outfit", and therefore it is completely irrelevant that it was when discussing the moral behaviour of its members today. I'm not ignorant of colonial history, but I'm calling you out on you using it as an excuse to call people hypocrites today.

You can't be responsible for something you didn't do. Like I've said (several times), you can't hold the institution responsible - only its members. If they didn't do something themselves, they can't be held to blame.
 
Last edited:

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
I'm still to be convinced that Russia is the "bad guy" in any of this.
I never picked them as an enemy, some western leaders did.

Under international law Bush and Blair might be on trial going by the West's own code for invading Iraq etc.

Good for the gander and all that.
I totally agree that Bush and Blair have a case to answer. But that does not mean Putin does not. The rule of law surely does not mean that, just because someone, somewhere has committed murder, then I can.
Putin signed a treaty stating that Russia, among others, would respect and protect the border integrity of Ukraine as an independent state. This he has broken. This is why he is the "bad guy".
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
I totally agree that Bush and Blair have a case to answer. But that does not mean Putin does not. The rule of law surely does not mean that, just because someone, somewhere has committed murder, then I can.
Putin signed a treaty stating that Russia, among others, would respect and protect the border integrity of Ukraine as an independent state. This he has broken. This is why he is the "bad guy".

That's aside from the fact that picking a 'bad guy' and a 'good guy' in conflicts is usually reductive and naïve. If people break international law then of course there'll be a reaction to that from many quarters (either in support or favour), but this isn't a football match where we always support one side or the other.
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
That's aside from the fact that picking a 'bad guy' and a 'good guy' in conflicts is usually reductive and naïve. If people break international law then of course there'll be a reaction to that from many quarters (either in support or favour), but this isn't a football match where we always support one side or the other.

Quite both sides aren't exactly glowing right now what with the west giving the new Ukrainian government billions of dollars even though most of its cabinet are members of new-nazi and fascist groups. On the other hand you Russia who have violated Ukraine's sovereignty in entering the Crimean peninsular.
 

reb0118

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Jan 2010
Messages
3,579
Location
Bo'ness, West Lothian
How about a re-jig of the borders in this area? Return Western Galicia to Poland, Sub Carpathian Ruthenia could become an autonomous protectorate of both the Czech Republic & Slovakia, Die Bukowina & Moldova to be incorporated into a Greater Romania.

A plebiscite should be held in what is left of Ukraine to decide whether the remaining population wish to join the Russian Fereration or form their own independent country.

Whilst we are at it Königsburg (Kaliningrad Oblast) should be governed as a free trade entrepôt directly by the European Union and Russia should be forced to cede Vyborg, the Karelian Isthmus, & the Petsamo region back to Finland.

(NB I have consumed a few Aspall Premier Cru ciders at 7% ABV ;))

Russia should then be told that Eastern Europe if off limits from now on in but that to compensate it can have a free hand in Central Asia - Russia's role in weltpolitik is the protection of Europe from the onslaught of the Asiatic Hordes!

Remember throughout history in this area borders & boundaries have come and gone, in general this did not affect too much the actual people living on the ground so to speak as all that really happened was a change of monarch, a new governor, and a new flag. It was only with the rise of nationalism in the last century (esp. in conjunction with fascism & communism) that the great genocides of Eastern Europe as well as the major population shifts have taken place. It appears that these upheavals have not yet fully resolved themselves in Ukraine - let us hope and pray that these current unrests are resolved soon and that, God forbid, they do not escalate across any neighbouring borders.

I can recommend the following books:-

Borderland by Ann Reid; God's Playground by Norman Davies, Historical Atlas of Central Europe - Magosci.
 

martinsh

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2011
Messages
1,765
Location
Considering a move to Memphis
How about a re-jig of the borders in this area? Return Western Galicia to Poland, Sub Carpathian Ruthenia could become an autonomous protectorate of both the Czech Republic & Slovakia, Die Bukowina & Moldova to be incorporated into a Greater Romania.

A plebiscite should be held in what is left of Ukraine to decide whether the remaining population wish to join the Russian Fereration or form their own independent country.

Whilst we are at it Königsburg (Kaliningrad Oblast) should be governed as a free trade entrepôt directly by the European Union and Russia should be forced to cede Vyborg, the Karelian Isthmus, & the Petsamo region back to Finland.
.

While you're about it, we Latvians would like Abrene (Pytalavo) back as well !
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,047
Talking of Koenigsberg I think we should re-establish both West and East Prussia and finally settle the "Polish Corridor" Question! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top