YorkshireBear
Established Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 9,667
Would it not be best to leave it to the experts (RAIB) to release their report as opposed to people speculate rather ridiculous things..?
Probably for the best.
Would it not be best to leave it to the experts (RAIB) to release their report as opposed to people speculate rather ridiculous things..?
Would it not be best to leave it to the experts (RAIB) to release their report as opposed to people speculate rather ridiculous things..?
I have my own theory as to what happened but I will wait until the report is published before I comment further.
Do Voyagers have sanders?
Do Voyagers have sanders?
Would it not be best to leave it to the experts (RAIB) to release their report as opposed to people speculate rather ridiculous things..?
"The train transferred unjustifiable amounts of momentum to the station infrastructure"
Apparently, the train hit the platform doing around 10mph and had no grip meaning the brakes were fairly ineffective, this resulted in the train ripping the buffers clean off as if they were not even there.
So, it was the fault of the platform builder for putting a platform there!
It was the fault of the track layer to put the buffers there and not a bigger gap between them and the platform area, increasing the stopping gap.
It was the fault of passengers not wanting to walk further to the train than caused the above gap to not be made!
Of course, we can all agree that nothing like this would have happened under BR, and it is the fault of privatisation and staff cut-backs.
Yes.
As I said the train has to make a deviation to the left after leaving Chester so having the Wrexham ones start from platform 2 allows them to do that without the need to cross other lines first.
If the train just didn't stop when it was supposed to it would be meet by a red signal somewhere and then if it ignored that it would have to go whichever way the points are set to not derail.
Steve Bagnall in Daily Post said:Train crash in Chester: Wrexham man tells how passengers clung on
A passenger told how rail travellers had to hang on when a train crashed into a station barrier leaving a 64-year-old needing hospital treatment.
Tony Davies, from Wrexham, was aboard the 10.10am service arriving at Chesters platform 1 which overran buffers at the end of the line and crashed into a platform wall.
Emergency crews were alerted at 12.10pm and raced to the station to deal with the incident.
A 64-year-old passenger was taken to hospital suffering back injuries, the North West Ambulance Service said.
Mr Davies, 48, who works at Kelloggs on the Wrexham Industrial Estate, said: I was travelling back from Stoke after visiting a friend the night before and was on the Virgin rain between Crewe and Chester.
Apparently, the train hit the platform doing around 10mph and had no grip meaning the brakes were fairly ineffective, this resulted in the train ripping the buffers clean off as if they were not even there.
Since they weren't there that is just what they have been told by fellow staff but it should be pretty reliable.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Ba dum tish![]()
Do Virgin and ATW use the same speed on that Crewe to Chester Line, yes their speed entering platform 1 at Chester had been a concern before.
Chester area has had its travel problems over the past few days with the air crash,some more pics & passenger comments here
http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/train-crash-chester-wrexham-man-6324687
[/QUOTE]I don't think the air crash delayed any trains Bob as I passed the scene on a HHD service only minutes after the crash.
AIUI, they don't operate below about 8mph.

What is the difference between "clinging on" and "holding on" as the train comes to a halt?
Re Sanders and the response quoted above.
What happens when you need sand to get moving?
Don't think they are sanders in the traditional sense, where boxes full of sand are available for the driver to use at his (or her) discretion.
I understand that Voyagers have a couple of "one shot" canisters which are essentially there for emergency use only when braking.
I'm guessing that there are enough powered axles on a Voyager to prevent significant starting problems, but am happy to be corrected by anyone in the know...
I believe you are correct with regards to the 'sanders' being used only for braking.
For any tricky starts the power handle has a small button - which if I remember correctly - is what the driver must push, this tells the train that it is a hill start or their may be wheelslip and alters the train's engines to match.
I can't remember properly, but that was what I was told by a member of staff at Bombardier Derby when I was taken around on a tour.
Hill start is used to start all trains fitted with a combined power/brake controller start away from stops without rolling back. Nothing to do with wheel slip.
What is the difference between "clinging on" and "holding on" as the train comes to a halt?
If it just carried straight on it would actually finish up on the Wirral line opposed to the North Wales line. For North Wales the train needs to make a deviation to the left after leaving Chester.
I very much doubt that this was a 10mph collision, no where near enough damage. You will probably find the speed was a lot less.
Thank god someone changed the title... the previous "platform interface crash" sounded like a load of naff management speak!
Aghh - failed attempt to post the pics.
But, yes, ouch!
Trying again to post the pics ...
View attachment 16574
View attachment 16575
Woohoo, it worked. All hail technology!
What is the difference between "clinging on" and "holding on" as the train comes to a halt?
...
Isn't that a copyright violation?