• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Siemens for Eurostar

Status
Not open for further replies.

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
The livery of the chunnel test train emerging with ICE written in Union Jacks made me want to puke....
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

monkey

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2009
Messages
431
Location
Leeds
^^It better not be true. just more evidence of the french making a right tit of themselves and rubbing the whole world up the wrong way...
 

j0hn0

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
563
Location
St Albans, England
I said a while ago that the "safety" restrictions in the tunnel were merely to ensure that only Eurostars, built by Alstom could use the tunnel.

Dismissed at the time but I think this is clearly protectionism
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
I wonder if the French would have objections to distributed traction if it were AGVs instead.

BTW have they managed to sell any yet?
 

Daimler

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2009
Messages
1,197
Location
Hertfordshire
I wonder if the French would have objections to distributed traction if it were AGVs instead.

BTW have they managed to sell any yet?

Indeed, I believe an Italian company is already taking delivery (can't remember if it's the main operator or another though).
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
I said a while ago that the "safety" restrictions in the tunnel were merely to ensure that only Eurostars, built by Alstom could use the tunnel.

Dismissed at the time but I think this is clearly protectionism

Sounds like Virgin on the West Coast, obviously someone in the French government has been taking notes!
 

T163R

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2010
Messages
475
Location
Paris, France
The French State is quite cross with Eurostar because it thinks that Siemens trains are not suitable for the Channel Tunnel. According to the French State, Siemens trains are not secure enough...
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Not secure enough?

Do they think illegal immigrants are going to climb onto the train at 100mph cos the doors insecure?

He means safe - French for Safe (as in not dangerous) is sécurité, it is also the word for Security (as in locked up)!
 
Joined
26 Sep 2009
Messages
556
Location
Bishops Stortford
Regardless of all the politics, the fact remains that until the tests are completed with ICE3 through the tunnel and, assuming it is deemed to be safe, the safety rules changed to accommodate Velaro, the Eurostar is the only passenger train (unless you class the Shuttle as a passenger train) that is certified to carry passengers.

On that basis, I think Eurostar has taken quite a risk in ordering the trains from Siemens BEFORE the testing by DB. I can't see any specific time constraint that forced them to order when they did, other than, maybe the price of the Siemens products increasing when they are approved for use, because of their increased usefulness. This, in itself is a bit of a puzzle.

Everybody (including Alstom with its AGV apparently) seems to be of the view that distributed traction is the way forward, so the sooner this thorny issue of tunnel safety is resolved, the better. After all, there's another, even longer tunnel currently being built between Switzerland and Italy (the Gotthard Base Tunnel, due to open in 2017) and I'm sure there are some who would like to experience through trains at high speed from London to Milan etc.
 

monkey

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2009
Messages
431
Location
Leeds
On that basis, I think Eurostar has taken quite a risk in ordering the trains from Siemens BEFORE the testing by DB. I can't see any specific time constraint that forced them to order when they did, other than, maybe the price of the Siemens products increasing when they are approved for use, because of their increased usefulness. This, in itself is a bit of a puzzle.
...as far as I am aware the velaro has been already approved through the tunnel provided it's of the normal full length like the current 373's are. The new Velaros that the ICE3 is, were designed to that specification from the beginning. the tests are being done because DB wants to use shorter trains...
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,726
Location
Milton Keynes
The new e320 will meet the current Tunnel minimum train length requirements, whereas the current Eurostar sets actually do not. Eurostars are 375 metres long which is the distance between the evacuation routes in the Tunnel. However, about 60 metres of the train length consists of power cars which are not accessible by passengers, so the actual lenth of the passenger compartment is about 315 metres. Whereas the e320 is 400 metres long and only a small fraction of each end car is inaccessible. Perhaps the existing E* trains should be banned?
 

Daimler

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2009
Messages
1,197
Location
Hertfordshire
The new e320 will meet the current Tunnel minimum train length requirements, whereas the current Eurostar sets actually do not. Eurostars are 375 metres long which is the distance between the evacuation routes in the Tunnel. However, about 60 metres of the train length consists of power cars which are not accessible by passengers, so the actual lenth of the passenger compartment is about 315 metres. Whereas the e320 is 400 metres long and only a small fraction of each end car is inaccessible. Perhaps the existing E* trains should be banned?

Surely if required in an emergency, passengers would be allowed to access evacuation doors through the power cars...
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,726
Location
Milton Keynes
evacuating 750 people through a power car seems madness, it's bad enough evacuating 460 people through the front door of an ICE3
 

EWS 58038

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Messages
356
Location
Almere (Greater Amsterdam)
On ****ter I heard Eurotunnel is pleased with the good ICE Evacuation test results. Trainwas evacuated in the region of 20 minutes, where 90 minutes is the current upper safety limit.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,834
Location
Epsom
Is that 20 minutes for the full 16 car formation of 2 x ICE and does it include getting everyone into the service tunnel, or simply off the ICE onto the evacuation platform adjacent to the train?
 

TGV

Member
Joined
25 Nov 2005
Messages
734
Location
320km/h Voie Libre
The new e320 will meet the current Tunnel minimum train length requirements, whereas the current Eurostar sets actually do not. Eurostars are 375 metres long which is the distance between the evacuation routes in the Tunnel. However, about 60 metres of the train length consists of power cars which are not accessible by passengers, so the actual lenth of the passenger compartment is about 315 metres. Whereas the e320 is 400 metres long and only a small fraction of each end car is inaccessible. Perhaps the existing E* trains should be banned?

Please tell me you're joking.

At least do better research. A class 373/1 is 394m long. The power cars are 22m in length.

Therefore the remainder 394-(22 x 2) = 350m not 315m.

Additionally - you have no evidence whatsoever that the new sets will be *exactly* 400m. The existing trains are often quoted as "400m" long as it's rounded up. The new ones could even be shorter by a small amount.
 

EWS 58038

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Messages
356
Location
Almere (Greater Amsterdam)
Is that 20 minutes for the full 16 car formation of 2 x ICE and does it include getting everyone into the service tunnel, or simply off the ICE onto the evacuation platform adjacent to the train?

From what I heard they did several tests. One was to disembark one train and to get people into the second unit. That was done in something like 20 minutes. Not bad at all.

Eurostar and DB are working closely together on this, Eurostar senior staff was monitoring the tests and knowledge is shared by both parties. It sure looks the two are working hard to get the Siemens trains safety case for the tunnel.

It was also announced Eurostar will conduct some further testing next year with a Velaro D.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
1) No idea. Numbering follows no rhyme nor reason much of the time (witness the Electrostars mainly cramming into 375-379- plus 357- whilst the AC Desiros are 350, 360 and 380).

2) Pretty sure the answer is "no"- think the International and High Speed platforms at St P use a French domestic signalling system.
Edit: here's the system used- they'll need to be fitted for that
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top