• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Siemens for Eurostar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
26 Sep 2009
Messages
556
Location
Bishops Stortford
Yeah. Because everyone else does, right?

Probably me just being mischievous, but it occurs to me that both Alstom and Bombardier have central sourcing units in China buying components for their worldwide projects (e.g. the entire interiors for the new and refurb SSL stock is manufactured in China) and Alstom has 13 (yes THIRTEEN) manufacturing plants of its own in China.

Errr, this is because they want to retain sustainable European manufacturing and support their own national interests, right? No, it's because they are in business to make profit, and rightly so.

This is the globalised world we live in... we should get used to it and so should the national and Continental (is that a correct description for the EU?!??) Governments.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Its a bit different making the seat covers in china versus making the traction motors in china.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Its a bit different making the seat covers in china versus making the traction motors in china.

In all honesty, I've got many major brand electronics that work perfectly, have good build quality and have lasted years, which have been made in China.

Aslong as the manufacture is properly regulated and good quality control is mantained I don't see what would be wrong with producing traction motor in China anyway.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Im not saying it as a quality issue, im saying that they wont do it for preservation of technology, domestic skills base and national pride.
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,726
Location
Milton Keynes
I was thinking earlier that having trains made by two different manufacturers might mitigate snow (or other) problems that E* experienced last winter

Having said that, the Velaro-D shown in Berlin last week did not look as good as the exisiting ICE-3, and whilst I don't like the cabs of the ICE-T there is less of a mess on the roof of those trains than on ICE-3 or Velaro-D sets
 

j0hn0

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
563
Location
St Albans, England
Here's the train on display in Hyde Park:

http://www.paulbigland.fotopic.net/c1904512.html

always there Paul, spot on :)

Looks like an air max trainer <D

Also good news, at least for me, the interior will be designed by pininfarina and NOT DB, hurray!

Do we really need to befoul the front of such a lovely train with the british high vis yellow? Is this really required on high speed lines?
 

Drsatan

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
1,887
Location
Land of the Sprinters
Do we really need to befoul the front of such a lovely train with the british high vis yellow? Is this really required on high speed lines?

Good question. Will the ICE3 set running to St Pancras later this month (or any foreign-operated train), need hi-vis yellow ends to operate on HS2?
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
As I'm discussing with @boriswatch on twitter at the moment- surely the top sepeed is wasted? There's very, very little 320km/h track in Europe. Unless they're just future-proofing, perhaps with an eye to running down LGV-Est? Certainly no 320km/h in UK, the Pas de Calais, Belgium or The Netherlands. Having 320km/h max stock running on a max 300km/h network would be like having 140mph stock running on a 125mph network... ie a bit like the ECML and WCML electrics...
 

EWS 58038

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Messages
356
Location
Almere (Greater Amsterdam)
LGV Nord has large sections of 320 km'h allowances under good weather conditions. It is common for Thalys trains to catch up some time between Lesquin and Remy at 320 km'h if they are a little late. And even at 320 km'h your well within safety limits which are topped at 345 km'h for that line.

As for Holland....

Section 1 (Hoofddorp - Rotterdam) only allows speeds up to 250 km'h due to the "Crazy cow tunnel".
Section 2 (Rotterdam - Antwerp) allows speeds up to 300 km'h and has been tested at 345 km'h as top safety limit. So 320 km'h could be possible... but wouldn't make any commercial sence.
 

j0hn0

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
563
Location
St Albans, England
there isn't even any 320k track in Germany

The first time I went on an ICE3, I took a high spec tomtom prototype on the journey between Frankfurt Airport and Koeln Messe/Deutz and the fastest we reached was 198mph.

And seeing as it had to be in a long open section without tunnels, maybe there are sections that can be pushed higher if conditions allow and the train is late (which is frequent in my experience)

Or maybe the driver was fined for caning it too much though :)

Either way, more is always better. By being capable of more, you are not always running at maximum capacity.

Still no Velaro double deckers in the pipeline though?
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,726
Location
Milton Keynes
whilst the top speed of ICE3s is supposed to be limited to 300k in Germany, I have been on a late running one between Frankfurt airport and Cologne which clocked 329k according to the in coach display screens. The coaches themselves show a maximum speed on the outside of 330k
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,177
Good question. Will the ICE3 set running to St Pancras later this month (or any foreign-operated train), need hi-vis yellow ends to operate on HS2?

It was reported on this Forum that because HS1 is not operated by NR, any trains operating on it that do not go onto the NR network do not require yellow ends.

So I'm confused. :|
 
Last edited:

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
It was reported on this Forum that because HS1 is not operated by NR, any trains operating on it that do not go onto the NR network do not require yellow ends.

So I'm confused. :|

The SNCF BB 22200s that worked through the Chunnel had yellow ends, I believe, and they could not operate beyond Dolland's Moor. I'd imagine that any ICE set working service trains would be required to have a yellow end, and if anyone cares to mock one up on Photoshop, I would be very interested.
 

Crossforth

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2009
Messages
1,337
Location
Lancashire
The SNCF BB 22200s that worked through the Chunnel had yellow ends, I believe, and they could not operate beyond Dolland's Moor. I'd imagine that any ICE set working service trains would be required to have a yellow end, and if anyone cares to mock one up on Photoshop, I would be very interested.

They were also give the class 22 in TOPS
 

EWS 58038

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Messages
356
Location
Almere (Greater Amsterdam)
I think it will be Yellow or White. European UIC standard rules require trains to have a 1 by 1 metre white or yellow part at the front. And as HS1 is build to UIC standards and the e320 would not have to go on any other British part of the network, it could be either yellow or white as both would comply to safely legislation.
 
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
696
The yellow ends on 373s and future Eurostar stock are - I was told by a Eurostar managerial type - part of the livery branding and is an iconic symbol.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,888
Location
UK
If they're going to run these trains to Amsterdam, can they make it look like a giant spliff?!
 

Daimler

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2009
Messages
1,197
Location
Hertfordshire
I think it will be Yellow or White. European UIC standard rules require trains to have a 1 by 1 metre white or yellow part at the front. And as HS1 is build to UIC standards and the e320 would not have to go on any other British part of the network, it could be either yellow or white as both would comply to safely legislation.

Really? How do the French get away with still building brand new TGVs with all-over silver front ends, and new freight locos with all-over green front ends? Don't these standards apply here?

I'm not necessarily doubting you, I genuinely don't know... :)
 

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
Really? How do the French get away with still building brand new TGVs with all-over silver front ends, and new freight locos with all-over green front ends? Don't these standards apply here?

I think the answer is simply because they're the French, and as such will ignore things like that if they want to.
 

Bastiaan

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2005
Messages
195
Location
Netherlands
I think it will be Yellow or White. European UIC standard rules require trains to have a 1 by 1 metre white or yellow part at the front. And as HS1 is build to UIC standards and the e320 would not have to go on any other British part of the network, it could be either yellow or white as both would comply to safely legislation.
One square metre yellow or white on the front is a Dutch regulation, not a European standard. Otherwise there wouldn't be trains with grey, red, green, blue or even black fronts in other European countries.
The fact that HS1 is built to continental standards doesn't automatically mean that British safety regulations don't apply there. It's still a line that is situated in Britain.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top