• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Scottish Electrification updates & discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

InOban

On Moderation
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,537
Thanks for the links. As it says, N means no published clearance, not that there is definitely an issue. For example, in the loco section, the class 68 is given as N for the whole WHL, even though, being lighter than the 66/7, it would presumably have fewer issues with the extreme speed limits set for that class over certain bridges.
 

QueensCurve

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2014
Messages
2,195
Remember that the main constraint on capacity into the station is the two-track tunnel and incline. Having more platform space does allow more capacity in the sense that you can have some more trains arrive than leave, or vice-versa, at peak times but this isn't an especially efficient or scalable method. In the short term the last simple thing that can be done is to electrify the Anniesland service. Sending trains out to Anniesland and back is a convenient way of getting rid of them during busy times without sending them too far to make up a return journey.

Presumably the constraint has been eased to an extent by the increase in the speeds through the junction at the station throat.
 

QueensCurve

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2014
Messages
2,195
If it wasn't for Buchanan Galleries which no doubt was a developer making money more than anything else, the station throat could have been extended into the tunnel with additional platforms in the parking area. When will we learn not to build on railway land when more and more people want to travel by train?

It was not the case that more people were traveling by train at the time these developments happened.

British rail rightly saw developers' money as a way they could benefit at a time when revenues were falling.

Rationalisation was an important buzzword.
 

QueensCurve

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2014
Messages
2,195
Isn't it rather wasteful to use 100mph trains pottering to Anniesland and back when they could be out on a mainline somewhere?

Not if they operate "in marginal time".

If they were lying over at QS, and could be sent to Anniesland and back to in time for their next duty.

It was this that justified through HST services from Kings X to Aberdeen and Inverness in the 1980s.
 

Train man

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2014
Messages
54
The A71 at West Calder is open and tempory traffic lights are in operation. Taken via Snapchat
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1431.jpg
    IMG_1431.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 84

Drumtochty

Member
Joined
5 Dec 2016
Messages
30
Minor Issue at Aberdeen Station re electrification.

Aberdeen Council, Network Rail etc. agreed a year or so ago to a scheme to remove Athol House an office building built in 1973 which sits over the north rail track of Aberdeen Station and replace it with a new development.

The original 1973 development also came with major changes to the station such as closing platforms 8 and 9 which were through platforms from south to north.

One of the items agreed in the new scheme was that the buildings to replace Athol House had to have clearance to allow electrification of the north lines to the latest regulations.

Now the developer “Atholl Square Developments Limited” has pulled out and started the paperwork to dissolve the company.

Anyone who travels about Aberdeen will comment on the large number of empty office buildings in the city due probably in equal parts to the oversupply of offices that started to be built in 2011 and 2012 and also the lower oil price which has reduced economic activity in the area. The developer is just facing cold economic facts.

The existing owners are trying to relet the building in the short term and to possibly redevop it in the longer term.

https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandg...2017-04-10&utm_term=Energy Voice - Newsletter

Hopefully this will not prevent electrification taking place circa 2030.
 
Last edited:

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,544
I think we assume it is and look forward to the electric services starting, something which should be quite nice when the new 385s enter traffic.
 

92002

Established Member
Joined
27 Mar 2014
Messages
1,251
Location
Clydebank
I think we assume it is and look forward to the electric services starting, something which should be quite nice when the new 385s enter traffic.

If you're going to wait on 385s there could be a bit of a wait.

Staff have been undergoing training on 380s to be used till the 385s arrive. Training will now be done on the newly electrified line. 380s due to start with the May timetable change.

380s being cascaded from Inverclyde services, which get the joys of 314s.
 

FS-2-11

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2015
Messages
54
I took my first trip on the E&G in c.10 years yesterday and made a point of having a closer look at developments.

All the main line wiring and overruns are in place now, although there are quite a few locations, notably around Polmont/Falkirk High and Cadder Yard, where the OHLE is still earth-strapped. A start has been made on Greenhill-Carmuirs, and the line north from Cumbernauld, where it passes under the E&G, has masts in place.

Some of the masts, particularly on the Almond Viaduct, have their EG plates covered up for some reason.

It did surprise me how little of Eastfield Depot is wired, so unless that is done over the summer I guess that will remain a small facility for the diesel fleet, with Millerhill for the AC units.

Queen Street High Level's OHLE now appears to have all the insulation in place - previously the headspan wires were tied straight to the supports as a temporary measure. The remodelling has improved arrival and departure speeds.

Some of the overbridge parapet extensions along the line look incredibly cheap - vertical metal plates bolted directly to the bridge structure. Effective as protection, but it looks terrible.

But overall - from someone who grew up to the sound of 27s peching up the hill - I couldn't be happier that it's finally almost here.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,544
Woant be rushing to bash 380s on the E and G as IMO they are not the nicest things on the rails however the Inverclydes having some 314s back after all this time is something I shall be sampling as they are a lot of fun at full wack.
 

Clansman

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
2,648
Location
Scotland and Hong Kong
If the 380s had full-length tables and carpeted floors, they'd be far more superior than their 350 counterparts down South - not that they nearly already are.

I've only ever used 314s when off to Hampden, and they cope with the demand pretty decently. Having been on a 334 on this route during these times also, I worry for the 385s on this route for many a reason.
 
Last edited:

Ginaro

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2016
Messages
132
Location
Scotland
Is there any news of what is next to be electrified post-2020? If not, when are we likely to find out?

I'm interested in the Fife Circle, which the OP has down as an unlikely 2024! Can the Forth Bridge even be electrified, and how much work would it be to fix the Kinghorn tunnel? Does the Halbeath bypass affect things if it gets the go ahead?

Sorry for all the questions :P
 

clc

Established Member
Joined
31 Oct 2011
Messages
1,326
Is there any news of what is next to be electrified post-2020? If not, when are we likely to find out?

We'll know in June when the HLOS is published. Strong contenders are East Kilbride, Barrhead, Maryhill and Edinburgh South Sub.
 

QueensCurve

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2014
Messages
2,195
Queen Street High Level's OHLE now appears to have all the insulation in place - previously the headspan wires were tied straight to the supports as a temporary measure. The remodelling has improved arrival and departure speeds.

Any photo of the revised headspan wires?

Did you lick something to make sure it was live? :razz:

I did that with my Hornby Dublo power supply around about 1970. A litterally shocking experience packing considerably more umph than a PP9. :oops:
 

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
I'm interested in the Fife Circle, which the OP has down as an unlikely 2024! Can the Forth Bridge even be electrified, and how much work would it be to fix the Kinghorn tunnel? Does the Halbeath bypass affect things if it gets the go ahead?

They are almost certainly going to get electrified. Both the Forth Bridge and various tunnels (IIRC, the tunnel immediately north of the bridge is fairly tight too) are going to be significant challenges for the work, hence the last proposal I heard included at least one or two control periods of design work for the tricky parts of the route, so we're likely talking mid-CP7 or CP8 before the Fife Circle gets electrified. And Markinch to Dundee may well wait a few more years after that.
 

Southsider

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2015
Messages
937
Woant be rushing to bash 380s on the E and G as IMO they are not the nicest things on the rails however the Inverclydes having some 314s back after all this time is something I shall be sampling as they are a lot of fun at full wack.

Meanwhile back on planet earth I recently travelled from Muirend to Ayr. The 314 rattled, clattered and banged its way to Central but the 380 glided rapidly and gracefully to Ayr. The 314s do their job but it must require an enthusiast's perspective to prefer them to the 380!
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
Have to agree with that sentiment. Inverclyde pax will be going from having comfortable, bright, modern carriages with 2+2 seating and adequate luggage space to having old trains with 3+2 low-back seating, doors that will open at every stop come rain or shine, and a much poorer journey quality. Of course, it will only be a short term issue (and they do get 314s from time to time even at present) but I reckon quite a few pax will be mighty miffed.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,592
Location
Scotland
And Markinch to Dundee may well wait a few more years after that.
The only difficult structure between Markinch and Dundee is the Tay Bridge. It's not a World Heritage Site so it will be much easier to implement a solution than for the Forth Bridge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top