hexagon789
Veteran Member
Indeed. Mind you, it could be sold as an upgrade to the Inverclyde users allowing for a release of more 380s… some of them really like to complain about being stuck with 314s.
Not me! I'd take a 314 over a 380 any day
Indeed. Mind you, it could be sold as an upgrade to the Inverclyde users allowing for a release of more 380s… some of them really like to complain about being stuck with 314s.
It's a pity we don't have a mole on the inside of the factory. I see no reason for secrecy. Just as passengers on a stuck train are much less unhappy if they are kept informed as to the reason, and the likely timescale, we are entitled to kept in the loop in this case.
Let's face it, if you put some new seats (not the Fainsa specials) and a CET unit in them the average passenger who is complaining in the Daily Record would probably be happy… age is nothing but a number.Not me! I'd take a 314 over a 380 any day
Let's face it, if you put some new seats (not the Fainsa specials) and a CET unit in them the average passenger who is complaining in the Daily Record would probably be happy… age is nothing but a number.
This has probably been mentioned earlier, but would the spare 365s not be an ideal gap stop. Is it training the crews on them that would be the issue?
It has been, it would be, and it probably is unfortunately. As I've said before on this thread, I really can't see anything other than long-term short-forming happening.
I would doubt very much that long-term short-forming would be acceptable, either to passengers, ScotRail or ScotGov. Passengers want a seat, ScotRail to avoid fines and ScotGov, who want to see results for funding the EGIP improvements.
Is it training the crews on them that would be the issue?
True, I understand your point (I can't say I like the idea of being stuck in 3-car trains in the peak for months on end), bit really what stock are ScotRail going to lease? There's too many ifs and buts with the options at hand.
At least there are alternative options to short-forming, all of which have their pros and cons. Unless there's a quick fix to the windscreen issue then do nothing is not an option. 12-18 months has been rumoured, if this proves true then I can see 365s coming north.
We'll be told something when there is something to say. I know it's hard in these days of social media, but businesses don't have an obligation to give a day by day blow by blow account of what is going on behind the scenes. I suspect there are a lot of commercial negotiations going on, some probably quite tough, both in respect of the Hitachi contract, and any plan to bring in stock as a stop-gap. Until these negotiations are finalised, the parties involved are quite entitled to expect a degree of confidentiality. Of course the first step is to find a solution and determine how long it will take to implement, and I am sure there is a huge amount of activity in this regard, particularly at Hitachi. Do you really expect a running commentary from Hitachi or Scotrail as to how this is progressing?It's a pity we don't have a mole on the inside of the factory. I see no reason for secrecy.
We'll be told something when there is something to say. I know it's hard in these days of social media, but businesses don't have an obligation to give a day by day blow by blow account of what is going on behind the scenes. I suspect there are a lot of commercial negotiations going on, some probably quite tough, both in respect of the Hitachi contract, and any plan to bring in stock as a stop-gap. Until these negotiations are finalised, the parties involved are quite entitled to expect a degree of confidentiality. Of course the first step is to find a solution and determine how long it will take to implement, and I am sure there is a huge amount of activity in this regard, particularly at Hitachi. Do you really expect a running commentary from Hitachi or Scotrail as to how this is progressing?
although it should have been apparent onwhatever test track they used.
At the very least, we need to know that Hitachi have accepted full responsibility for the delay, and therefore the costs associated with that.
After all, they could argue that if the wires had been up in time, they would have discovered the issue earlier, although it should have been apparent onwhatever test track they used.
I guess they drive on the other side of the road in the Czech republic so the signals would be on the right so visible through a different part of the glass and the issue didn't show?
If we all had sources this forum would cease to exist of course.Would you care to quote a source for that or is it another case where “apparently” = a rumour I heard on the platform end/in the mess room?
How long does it take to train a driver on a new type of train? Is there a limit to the number of types that they are able to drive?
Again, we might want to know, but we don't need to know. And we clearly won't be told until those commercial negotiations have concluded. And I do agree with gingertom that passengers are entitled to an explanation as to what is going on and when they can expect improvements, but one cannot expect to be told everything until there is a plan in place and the commercials have been agreed with all the relevant parties. As one example, for all we know Scotrail or Hitachi (who will probably end up paying) are having negotiations with a couple of ROSCOs to lease alternative stock. You wouldn't seriously expect this to be made public as that information (what type of stock, how many options are available) could influence the price they could get from the ROSCOs.At the very least, we need to know that Hitachi have accepted full responsibility for the delay,.
UK trains drive on the left, just like road vehicles. But so do Swiss trains - trains on the left, despite road vehicles being right. Polish trains do drive on the right however, and photos suggest that the Czechs are likewise on the right.I guess they drive on the other side of the road in the Czech republic so the signals would be on the right so visible through a different part of the glass and the issue didn't show?
They were being tested between Gourock/Wemyss Bay and Langbank initially. Then hauled to Shields or Mossend, so where there were multiple signals together ie Paisley Gilmour Street approach (from Glasgow side) the 385 never operated under its own power during the initial testing.
It has probably been when they started running at night on Edinburgh to Glasgow that this became apparent, hence why there were test runs between Glasgow Central and Paisley Gilmour Street to find out what was happening
The Czechs and Poles (Galicia) converted to right hand running over the years after independence
Certainly can't be making them look all that good.
Kinda like Alstom in the late 90s...
I know it would make me think twice about ordering anything from Hitachi, when they've engineered this flaw