swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 34,265
Will the UK testing be done at Old Dalby?
Some might be, but not all. It isn't big enough to do decent runs for mileage accumulation for a start.
Will the UK testing be done at Old Dalby?
Here it is, looking nice.
They should get a picture of it besides the Scottish highlands soon, not this industrial rubbish!
Will these be sharing any maintenance facilities in Scotland with the IEPs (with both being by the same manufacturer)?
the 385s are having a new facility built at the Millerhill yard as their primary depot
the 385s are having a new facility built at the Millerhill yard as their primary depot
To be that annoying pedant - it'll be a while seeing as they're EMUs and the Highlands aren't wired....They should get a picture of it besides the Scottish highlands soon...
I know,Calm down, they're only loading it off the ship!
Locomotives?To be that annoying pedant - it'll be a while seeing as they're EMUs and the Highlands aren't wired.![]()

Will the UK testing be done at Old Dalby?
I believe the current rules require units to have a rather substantial deflector just above the rail level and overriders, hence the "chin". Although some recent units may have worked around this better.Not a bad looking design, very Desiro like. But I cant say I'm a fan of the rather ugly 'chin' of that air dam. I hope it's reinforced as well, as experience shows these things don't tend to last long in one piece!
I believe the current rules require units to have a rather substantial deflector just above the rail level and overriders, hence the "chin". Although some recent units may have worked around this better.
The RAIB urged the relevant parties to retrofit a deflector to Electrostars only a few months ago, as can be read about here.Makes me wonder how extra 387's were ordered and yet doesn't comply...
That being said, I actually like the 'chin'; it makes the unit look more robust.
The RAIB urged the relevant parties to retrofit a deflector to Electrostars only a few months ago, as can be read about here.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hstcallum/8499891133/in/photostream/
Are them two metal blocks either side of the coupler obstacle deflectors?
OMG that's one pig ugly looking train, makes a 380 look good, OK I know the latest regs make things more difficult especially with a corridor connection but that's a bit of a minger.
OMG that's one pig ugly looking train, makes a 380 look good, OK I know the latest regs make things more difficult especially with a corridor connection but that's a bit of a minger.
I have said this before, but it looks to me like a Hitachi version of the class 380.
I believe the current rules require units to have a rather substantial deflector just above the rail level and overriders, hence the "chin". Although some recent units may have worked around this better.