• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Scotrail Class 385 Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

J-2739

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2016
Messages
2,237
Location
London
Here it is, looking nice.

Looks like a cross between a Desiro unit and a AT300 unit. Such a slick design. They should get a picture of it besides the Scottish highlands soon, not this industrial rubbish!
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Will these be sharing any maintenance facilities in Scotland with the IEPs (with both being by the same manufacturer)?
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
the 385s are having a new facility built at the Millerhill yard as their primary depot
 

Clansman

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
2,649
Location
Scotland and Hong Kong
the 385s are having a new facility built at the Millerhill yard as their primary depot

Really? Any confirmation on this - only asking because apparently (since we're talking about depots) there's a new depot planned to be built in Perth for the HSTs and to cater for electric trains for future electrification programs?
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,424
Location
Salt & Vinegar
the 385s are having a new facility built at the Millerhill yard as their primary depot

As I understand it Millerhill will be their nightly stabling point and where they undergo cleaning / washing / fueling / CET emptying etc but Craigentinny will be where they go for any maintenance requirements.

I'm not sure exactly how that will be split and if there may be some light maintenance at Millerhill.
 

Philip Phlopp

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2015
Messages
3,003
This has been discussed extensively, but to recap.

Class 385s are based formally at the new Millerhill depot, being built as part of the EGIP project. This will be a light maintenance and stabling facility.

The heavy maintenance work will take place at Craigentinny when that passes to Hitachi as part of the IEP/Agility Trains East operation. Hitachi will also maintain the HST sets at Craigentinny under contract, with additional maintenance at Inverness to make use of their skill and experience with Mark 3 maintenance.

Haymarket was looking slightly under utilised, but with the decision to retain more DMU stock, they'll have a slightly lighter workload which should hopefully allow the DMU stock to get back on depot earlier and a regime more like SWT at Salisbury developed, which will do wonders for their slightly poor MPC figures.
 

Clansman

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
2,649
Location
Scotland and Hong Kong
New photo uploaded onto Twitter by @Scotrail and the second retweeted by @HitachiRailEurope

Cpf24fIWcAA2N7y.jpg


CpgN35PWAAAMZax.jpg:large
 
Last edited:

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,630
Location
Hampshire
Not a bad looking design, very Desiro like. But I cant say I'm a fan of the rather ugly 'chin' of that air dam. I hope it's reinforced as well, as experience shows these things don't tend to last long in one piece!
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Not a bad looking design, very Desiro like. But I cant say I'm a fan of the rather ugly 'chin' of that air dam. I hope it's reinforced as well, as experience shows these things don't tend to last long in one piece!
I believe the current rules require units to have a rather substantial deflector just above the rail level and overriders, hence the "chin". Although some recent units may have worked around this better.
 

J-2739

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2016
Messages
2,237
Location
London
I believe the current rules require units to have a rather substantial deflector just above the rail level and overriders, hence the "chin". Although some recent units may have worked around this better.

Makes me wonder how extra 387's were ordered and yet doesn't comply...
That being said, I actually like the 'chin'; it makes the unit look more robust.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Makes me wonder how extra 387's were ordered and yet doesn't comply...
That being said, I actually like the 'chin'; it makes the unit look more robust.
The RAIB urged the relevant parties to retrofit a deflector to Electrostars only a few months ago, as can be read about here.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
No - they're overriders. The obstacle deflecter is just above rail head height to push things out of the way on the rails.
 

47802

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
3,454
OMG that's one pig ugly looking train, makes a 380 look good, OK I know the latest regs make things more difficult especially with a corridor connection but that's a bit of a minger.
 
Last edited:

J-2739

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2016
Messages
2,237
Location
London
OMG that's one pig ugly looking train, makes a 380 look good, OK I know the latest regs make things more difficult especially with a corridor connection but that's a bit of a minger.

I can see why you don't like it, but I think this is a gorgeous design! Sleek 158 styled windows, slanted front, Japanese like-headlamps... the list goes on. This train design shall bring moments of joy to Scottish rail travel.

Ok, maybe I'm overreacting, but I don't see the design as bad as most people on this forum. There are worse designs- 380, 456, 319.
 
Last edited:

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
OMG that's one pig ugly looking train, makes a 380 look good, OK I know the latest regs make things more difficult especially with a corridor connection but that's a bit of a minger.

I have said this before, but it looks to me like a Hitachi version of the class 380.
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Will the corridor connection retract when not in use or is it fixed in that position permanently?
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,630
Location
Hampshire
I have said this before, but it looks to me like a Hitachi version of the class 380.

I agree! My only drawback with them is the over sized 'Bo Selecta' chin it has. If they just scaled back that front fairing, it would look a lot sleeker!
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
2,173
Location
Huyton
Forward visibility looks as if it'll be horrendous with this funny shaped windscreens!
 

Harbornite

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2016
Messages
3,627
For those incapable of clicking links, here are the pictures from the railjournal article.

08ccde270650dad9617cfc2a609b3674_XL.jpg


385-Velim-2_VOSMAN.jpg



And here's Bo selecta as Craig David, something else with a big chin.

51ygztCUvKL._AC_UL320_SR226,320_.jpg
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,630
Location
Hampshire
I believe the current rules require units to have a rather substantial deflector just above the rail level and overriders, hence the "chin". Although some recent units may have worked around this better.

Just noticed your reply from a few weeks ago. It's something I agree with - not least with the small but apparent rise of the likes of shopping trolleys or bikes left on the line, but if the Desiro City & 380 can have an open plough like deflector and still look like neat designs, then it's a shame someone within DCA or Hitachi (whomever is designing these units) has stuck what appears to be a large fiberglass fairing over the front of it - You've only got to look at the designs from Derby to see how easily broken they can be - the 165/166 and early batches of Class 168s & 170s for example. Although I've not seen as many Electrostars with broken front ends - presumably down to a good number of spares?

Hence my Bo Selecta (cheers All 4 :lol:) comment - the face of the units look fairly neat, just let down by the bulbous chin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top