• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Royal Mail to cease using trains

Status
Not open for further replies.

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,142
Location
North London or Mildmay line
A modern network would have a far greater route mileage electrified for which electric locos would be needed. Add to that, DB (and its predecessors) non-use of electric traction is unforgivable.
I could not agree more. This never happened under BR. Fingers crossed GBR gets control of freight at some point rather than these private companies.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,543
Location
Northampton
A modern network would have a far greater route mileage electrified for which electric locos would be needed. Add to that, DB (and its predecessors) non-use of electric traction is unforgivable.
The people you should be railing against are those who allowed the price of electricity to exceed the price of diesel. And that isn't DB's board.
 

cav1975

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
456
Sounds perfectly like Royal Mail to me

ANYTHING with more than 10 years of service - they want to get rid of it....
o_O:{:{
I'm not sure that you are right here. The vast majority of Royal Mail delivery vans (Medway towns) round here appear to be 09 or 10 plates, so about 15 years old. Very tatty and don't give you confidence in RM or their services.
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
5,247
RM is all about cost cutting. It's been the same ever since it was sold off to the highest bidder and it became about lining the shareholders' pockets
 

DBS92042

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2019
Messages
1,798

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
4,374
Location
belfast
A modern network would have a far greater route mileage electrified for which electric locos would be needed. Add to that, DB (and its predecessors) non-use of electric traction is unforgivable.
If you ran a commercial operation, would you use electric locomotives if doing so cost more than running diesels, purely because it's better for the environment? Especially if your customers were not prepared to pay more for AC traction so you had to suck up the additional cost yourself? Seems like a pretty straightforward commercial decision to me.
The people you should be railing against are those who allowed the price of electricity to exceed the price of diesel. And that isn't DB's board.
I agree railway freight should be electric as much as possible.

However, the incentives for the (private) FOCs aren't quite right at the moment - railway diesel is too cheap, and UK electricity is too expensive.

When we get periods of time gas isn't part of the electricity mix (scheduled to start happening in 2025), electricity prices should start to fall, as they won't be set by gas prices anymore for at least part of the time.

This is all further complicated by the fact that, all else being equal, having fewer types of locos is usually cheaper than having more types of locos, as you need less staff training/refreshers, etc. Of course, every FOC needs diesel locos, so for FOCs with more locos than they have work for (such as DB/EWS), there is a continuous draw to stop using the electric locos.
 

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,741
4Z36 to SIMS 325016/004

008/009 in AD Junction

 
Last edited:

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
Why is the name Sims still used? The site is now a company called Unimetals, no?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Here’s something interesting…. a union rep has just claimed that there will be some usage of trains over Christmas by Royal Mail.
Presumably stock hired-in?
I have no further details at present.
 
Last edited:

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,275
Why is the name Sims still used? The site is now a company called Unimetals, no?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Perhaps people read the RTT name for the location as being correct, however the rail location name can take years to be updated, (that’s if it ever happens).

Since found by Googling that the Unimetals take over of Sims was announced in August just gone, but for completion during 2025…
 

Adrian Barr

Member
Joined
2 Jul 2020
Messages
779
Location
Doncaster
Here’s something interesting…. a union rep has just claimed that there will be some usage of trains over Christmas by Royal Mail.

That's intriguing...

A couple of interesting pictures of 325s at Newport AD Junction yard taken earlier this week:
The 3 units of 4Z71 (see post #397) after arrival on Wednesday morning, together with 325009 in the sidings: https://www.flickr.com/photos/148982509@N03/54137634805/
325009 and 325008 left in the sidings after the departure of 325016 + 325004 to Newport Docks on Wednesday's 4Z36 (as per post #399): https://www.flickr.com/photos/turners_pics/54138058287/

The 4Z91 schedule this morning (Willesden PRDC to Crewe Electric Depot) was cancelled in the end.
 

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
Here’s something interesting…. a union rep has just claimed that there will be some usage of trains over Christmas by Royal Mail.
Presumably stock hired-in?
I have no further details at present.
It seems that the union rep in question is now saying some off-the-cuff remarks were misinterpreted. We await developments (or not).
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,543
Location
Northampton
Here’s something interesting…. a union rep has just claimed that there will be some usage of trains over Christmas by Royal Mail.
Presumably stock hired-in?
I have no further details at present.
It seems that the union rep in question is now saying some off-the-cuff remarks were misinterpreted. We await developments (or not).
RM's original announcement did say they'd continue to use rail, just not dedicated trains:
A Royal Mail spokesperson said it was becoming difficult to secure parts for maintenance and, after reviewing plans to acquire new trains, it was decided that using other commercial rail services and increasing road deliveries was a better option.

They said: “To improve reliability, increase cost effectiveness and remain consistent with our environmental goals, over the coming months we will cease operating our own trains while continuing to use a mix of rail, road and air to transport mail to all corners of the UK.”
(From https://www.theguardian.com/busines...nd-of-the-line-for-royal-mails-freight-trains)

Putting some swapbodies or containers on a freightliner train from e.g. Daventry to Coatbridge would be very simple, or they could even contract with Orion for a seasonal parcels flow. The trains won't be RM branded but they also then don't necessarily need to enter into a big contract with a particular FOC.
 

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
RM's original announcement did say they'd continue to use rail, just not dedicated trains:

(From https://www.theguardian.com/busines...nd-of-the-line-for-royal-mails-freight-trains)

Putting some swapbodies or containers on a freightliner train from e.g. Daventry to Coatbridge would be very simple, or they could even contract with Orion for a seasonal parcels flow. The trains won't be RM branded but they also then don't necessarily need to enter into a big contract with a particular FOC.
I thought the Orion ex-319 trains were defunct? We did at one time have a regular Orion train at PRDC for a short while, but it was ceased after a few months. It ran in the 12:26 to Warrington path.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,543
Location
Northampton
I thought the Orion ex-319 trains were defunct? We did at one time have a regular Orion train at PRDC for a short while, but it was ceased after a few months. It ran in the 12:26 to Warrington path.
I've lost track of what exactly has happened to Orion or similar proposals, but the point still stands - there is nothing preventing Royal Mail contracting with existing FOCs or wider logistics company to carry mail by rail, and they have indicated this remains part of their plans going forward. They just won't be using their own dedicated units.

If a flow is highly seasonable, I can see why it makes a lot more commercial sense to contract with somebody for the length of time you need that capacity, rather than have your own units sitting under-utilised for the rest of the year.
 

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
Parcels are busy throughout the year these days, they just peak around Amazon Prime Day, Black Friday and Christmas
 

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
Found an old photo of the Orion train at Princess Royal Distribution Centre, on 8th October 2021.
An eager reception party of RM people stood waiting on the Platform 1 and 2 island… and I could see how the points were set… and photographed it rolling into Platform 3 !!

Note that it still bore the number 319373
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4976.jpeg
    IMG_4976.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 172

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
4,374
Location
belfast
Why is the name Sims still used? The site is now a company called Unimetals, no?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Here’s something interesting…. a union rep has just claimed that there will be some usage of trains over Christmas by Royal Mail.
Presumably stock hired-in?
I have no further details at present.
Hasn't royal mail contracted varamis in the past to do runs for them at busy times?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,275
Unimetals is apparently the new parent company for Sims.
It’s a purchase of a division. Sims have sold their operation known as “UK Metal” to Unimetals, but that’s not their whole business. This is what I found before writing my earlier post #401 but I thought it’s probably off topic for this thread:

Sims Ltd., headquartered in Australia, has entered into a binding agreement to sell its U.K. Metal business (UKM) to London-based Unimetals Group Ltd.
 
Last edited:

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
Hasn't royal mail contracted varamis in the past to do runs for them at busy times?
No.
But there have been some members of their fleet stabled tantalising close to the end of Platform 1 at PRDC at various times in the past 12 months

(image shows Varamis unit 321419 at the buffer stops outside PRDC on 23/5/2024, seen from the window of a southbound Bakerloo line train)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6839.png
    IMG_6839.png
    2.9 MB · Views: 163

Adrian Barr

Member
Joined
2 Jul 2020
Messages
779
Location
Doncaster
The two 325s which remained in Newport AD Junction yard have now moved to Unimetals at Newport Docks.

66142 took 325008 to the scrapyard on Friday (15th November) as 4Z36

66168 took 325009 to the scrapyard this morning, also as 4Z36
 

richard_S

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2018
Messages
140
With Royal mail stopping the rail traffic and switching to road could come back and bite them in the ar$e. Charging for roads by a pence per mile could come in. It would make bulk mail a lot cheaper by rail on long distance runs. I think royal mail are making a quick buck that will cost them in the long term.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,785
Location
Somewhere, not in London
With Royal mail stopping the rail traffic and switching to road could come back and bite them in the ar$e. Charging for roads by a pence per mile could come in. It would make bulk mail a lot cheaper by rail on long distance runs. I think royal mail are making a quick buck that will cost them in the long term.
Honestly the capacity afforded by a maximum of 64 carriages of train isn't evening going to be a rounding error in that of the road fleet in terms of cost impact for road pricing.

"6200 Trucks and Trailers" according to RM themselves.

Standard internal length of one of these trailers is around 13.4m. The available internal length on a 20m unit EMU is around 17m if we're being super generous, the recent conversions have it around the same.

So even if you could get the fleet utilisation of the rail fleet as high as the road fleet, which it's NEVER been, you'd be looking at around 1.4% impact on the cost of fleet operation in terms of road pricing, assuming the operation of the train was free, which is very much is not.
 

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
Royal Mail have abandoned using trains before. Only to reverse the decision less than 18 months later.

They ARE ceasing use of the 325s.

But the ability to convey 708 Yorks (wheeled containers) of approximately 140,000 parcels between PDDC in North West London and Shieldmuir in about 7.5 hours (and the same number in the reverse direction) is something I feel confident they will do again, even if only as a trial, with commercial operators.
Their press release did say they would continue to use a mix of air, road and rail.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,543
Location
Northampton
With Royal mail stopping the rail traffic and switching to road could come back and bite them in the ar$e. Charging for roads by a pence per mile could come in. It would make bulk mail a lot cheaper by rail on long distance runs. I think royal mail are making a quick buck that will cost them in the long term.
RM have explicitly said they aren't stopping mail by rail, just dedicated mail train and units. They can stick a container on an intermodal train easy enough.
 

Skimpot flyer

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Messages
1,938
Going slightly off-topic, here’s an interesting article and video about RM’s partnership with tech firm Wiliot.

“Wiliot’s sticker-like tags house tiny computers that are automatically detected by nearby Bluetooth devices as they travel through the network, removing the need for manual scanning and providing real-time feedback on location”

 

mrmartin

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,292
RM is all about cost cutting. It's been the same ever since it was sold off to the highest bidder and it became about lining the shareholders' pockets
Yes nothing to do with the complete collapse of letter volumes and the brutal competition from Amazon, DPD et al using mostly self employed drivers...

The main market (parcels) it serves is incredibly cost focussed. That means to survive it needs to basically be a cost cutting enterprise, getting more parcels through at lower cost.

Doesn't really matter if it is state run or privately owned. If it was state run you'd almost certainly see very aggressive cost cutting - perhaps even harder than the private sector - given the state of public finances.

Clearly these trains are not useful these days with such small letter volumes (which are declining year over year). They don't work well for parcels, at a guess you'd fit 2 or 3 HGVs worth of parcels on a train, which means it doesn't work, given a train driver costs a lot more than a HGV one and if the trains were life expired then it'd be incredibly expensive to replace Vs a handful of HGVs.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,183
… and if the trains were life expired then it'd be incredibly expensive to replace Vs a handful of HGVs.
Which in this instance, they weren’t, but that’s by-the-by.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top