Adrian Barr
Member
4N02 not running (auto-call schedule / "Q" path / not required) but on the plus side 6M84 Colas china clay is a runner
Ok thanks, do you think it will run this week or not?4N02 not running (auto-call schedule / "Q" path / not required) but on the plus side 6M84 Colas china clay is a runner
Ok, thanks for this4N02 not planned to run this week - it might start running at some point in the future but I've not heard any rumours about a new service starting.
The trains to Hanwell and onwards towards the North London line are luck of the draw, really, so I wouldn’t be surprised if 66s appear.6O40 Westbury to Arlington (nr Haywards Heath), plus 6V57 return. The service is booked to start this week; today’s path not used. The rest of this week is showing "as required".
I am keen to see whether the service will utilise 59s - as used on 6O68 Westbury to Crawley - or whether 66 also appear on it, as per 6O52 Westbury to Chichester. The paths show "load 1800 tons" which mirrors the Crawley turn; so my guess is 59 allocated to it.
Ruddy spell check!The trains to Hanwell and onwards towards the North London line are luck of the draw, really, so I wouldn’t be surprised if 66s appear.
Also - do you mean “Ardingly”?
That’s interesting - I rather assumed the Mendip 59s and 66s were in a common pool when it came to the stone trains. However, a quick check does indeed support what you have said!Ruddy spell check!Thanks - corrected.
The Crawley turn, in its first year of running, I think produced only three instances of 66 haulage. I don't know if preference for a 59 is for haulage characteristics, or merely convenience for allocation.
The West Coastway route is pretty flat; I suspect the leg from the Mendips to the south coast, is more hilly.
I suspect the leg from the Mendips to the south coast, is more hilly.
Thanks Adrian. Interesting that the typical 18-19 bogies on 6O68 turns, only just tips beyond the 66's threshold.The bank from Westbury to Warminster limits the max load heading onto the southern. Max load for a standard 66 would be about 17 wagons, a 59 can pull 19 or 20 (19 wagons on today's 6O68).
It was at just before 4pmHi guys, not sure if im in the right thread here.
I was near Shrewsbury station today on a bridge overlooking the sidings. Me and a man were fascinated by them loading this GB railfreight service. Im now interested in Tracking the services but i am struggling to use the working time table? As i can understand it, it is no longer a web service and it printed in advance in pdfs? very confused, help is appreciated
In the sidings on the line to chirk and wrexhamHi guys, not sure if im in the right thread here.
I was near Shrewsbury station today on a bridge overlooking the sidings. Me and a man were fascinated by them loading this GB railfreight service. Im now interested in Tracking the services but i am struggling to use the working time table? As i can understand it, it is no longer a web service and it printed in advance in pdfs? very confused, help is appreciated
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
It was at just before 4pm
Could it have been this? https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:H26094/2024-12-16/detailed#allox_id=0Hi guys, not sure if im in the right thread here.
I was near Shrewsbury station today on a bridge overlooking the sidings. Me and a man were fascinated by them loading this GB railfreight service. Im now interested in Tracking the services but i am struggling to use the working time table? As i can understand it, it is no longer a web service and it printed in advance in pdfs? very confused, help is appreciated
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
It was at just before 4pm
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
In the sidings on the line to chirk and wrexham
Thank you kindlyCould it have been this? https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:H26094/2024-12-16/detailed#allox_id=0
(PS - Real Time Trains is a great way to track freight train movements - it can be a bit fiddly working out what different freight terminals are called but once you get the hang of it it should be fairly intuitive.)
Interesting that the typical 18-19 bogies on 6O68 turns, only just tips beyond the 66's threshold.
I have seen some of Crawley and Chichester workings part-loaded, so it is possible those three known 66-hauled 6O68 turns were part loads.
I was near Shrewsbury station today on a bridge overlooking the sidings. Me and a man were fascinated by them loading this GB railfreight service.
Some of Steve's Flickr shots bear an uncanny resemblance to ones on my "Loco Hauled Around Havant" photos thread, on this very forum. Wow. That is an incredibly detailed and informative post! Do you mind if I ask you one question regarding the stone trains, which is: are there any of the GWML trains towards London which are regularly 59 hauled? The ones I usually see come from Chelmsford, Churchyard Sidings and Dagenham. They used to be dominated by 59s but now see 66s almost always.To be more specific, the max trailing loads via Warminster are 1705 tons for a standard 66, 1770 tons for a 66/6, and 2000 for a 59.
The box wagons on the Crawley are typically ~98 tons fully loaded, so a 66/6 could pull 18 if needed. Judging from photos, it appears that 59s are the usual traction for anything running via Warminster, although the trains with 17 wagons can run with 66s if required without reducing the load:
Usual traction and loads of Mendip stone trains via Warminster:
- Southampton: 59 + 17 bogie boxes
- Fareham: 59 + 17 bogie boxes
- Chichester: 59 + 14 bogie boxes (limited by terminal length)
- Crawley: 59 + 19 wagons (boxes or sometimes hoppers)
- Botley: 59 + 19 hoppers
- Eastleigh: 59 + 19 hoppers
- Woking: 59 + 17 bogie boxes (length limited by shunts at Woking)
The caption to this photo of 66596 on 6O68 in April 2024 mentions it was only the second appearance of a 66/5 on the working - it had 19 wagons but 7 were empty.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/64657021@N07/53633050162/
From memory, I think 59s have always been fairly solid traction on the night workings to Eastleigh or Botley, with 18 or 19 wagons typical (I count 19 in this shot of 59102 at Eastleigh in 2021): https://www.flickr.com/photos/92715194@N04/51757045801/
66s were more common on the Fareham workings, with 16 wagons seen here behind 66131 in 2018: https://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisperkins/27273830907/
I'm intrigued to see that hoppers (as well as boxes) are sometimes used on the Crawley workings - today's 6O68 is running with 16 HOA / IIAs for example.
The caption to this August photo of 59103 with hoppers on 6O68 explains a bit more about why this use of hoppers sometimes occurs:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/64657021@N07/53938691375/
The Cemex hopper discharge facility at Crawley was previously served via an interesting working from Peak Forest:
60065 passes Clapham Junction in 2009 with the empties: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jason15c/16540747451/
Loadhaul 60059 passing Redhill, also in 2009: https://www.flickr.com/photos/locohunter/6259972220/
After those Cemex workings from Peak Forest ceased, there were occasional trains of hoppers into Crawley (e.g. from Cardiff Docks and Cliffe), but most trains ran with box wagons, presumably to the other terminal which is owned by Days, although there is also a Brett Concrete Plant and an "Express Asphalt" plant owned by Aggregate Industries there. In addition to the regular Mendip trains, Crawley has received traffic from a variety of places in 2024 including Bardon Hill, Coton Hill (Shrewsbury), Grain, Cliffe and also "incinerator bottom ash aggregate" from the Days incinerator ash processing facility at Brentford.
I'm not sure if the Cemex terminal has closed and reopened at some point (Crawley Cemex Concrete Plant has an entry on the Cemex website but is shown as temporarily closed on Google maps) or whether the hopper discharge is being used by Days or Brett in addition to box wagons. Signs at the entrance to Crawley on google streetview are visible for Aggregate Industries, Day Aggregates, and Cemex Readymix - with two separate terminals at Crawley and possibly four different customers involved, it's rather confusing!
The wagons on the service linked by geordieblue (6F05 19:31 Coton Hill - Wellingborough) have delivered the stone to Colnbrook this morning as 6V48 03:50 from Wellingborough.
It's one of the hopper sets used by Aggregate Industries. After working the regular 6E97 Bardon Hill - Tinsley stone train yesterday, it ran to Coton Hill as 6M05 (via Derby, Walsall and Wolverhampton). After unloading the stone at Colnbrook today, the wagons are returning to Bardon Hill as 6M54. The Aggregate Industries sets spend most of their time working from Bardon Hill and Grain. As I understand it, the material loaded at Coton Hill is special "high PSV" stone from a local quarry, used in the production of skid-resistant asphalt.
are there any of the GWML trains towards London which are regularly 59 hauled?
Thank you!I think 59s are still regular traction for the jumbo services which split at Southall or Hanwell, but from there I don't know which portions are booked for 59 vs 66 traction (especially since the Mendip timetable was recast a while back).
Looking at movements of the 59s this month, they have worked 7A80 / 6A00 / 6A40 / 7A30 / 6A90 / 7A29 / 6A10 jumbos from the quarries to London.
59s have also worked the following portions of the jumbos from Hanwell or Southall this month, although might not be the most common or booked traction on any particular service:
Acton stone terminal 7A31
Bow 7L81
Brentford 7A33
Chelmsford 6L14
Crawley 6O38
Dagenham 6L28
Harlow 6L42
Neasden 7M49
Newhaven 6O12
Purfleet 6L95
Purley 6O44/6O45
Tolworth 7O45
Watford 7M53
Adrian's reply mentions the "jumbo" double consists; and this shot on the Berks & Hants main - admittedly back in summer 2015 - gives a flavour.Wow. That is an incredibly detailed and informative post! Do you mind if I ask you one question regarding the stone trains, which is: are there any of the GWML trains towards London which are regularly 59 hauled?
Fantastic shot - I’ve always wanted to go to that canal place - it looks wonderful!Adrian's reply mentions the "jumbo" double consists; and this shot on the Berks & Hants main - admittedly back in summer 2015 - gives a flavour.
Thank you. I totally fluked that shot, zero pre planning!Fantastic shot - I’ve always wanted to go to that canal place - it looks wonderful!
I'm wondering if there's any further news on this, supposedly due to start next month, or whether it's one of those things that never got further than a press release.
Other international routes in the pipeline for 2025 include a new ‘combi’ service between Valenton and Daventry, connecting Paris to the logistics heartland of England, on the London-Birmingham route.
There was a trial a while ago with a DB Class 92 with wagons from Wembley to Ripple Lane via Gospel Oak, Camden Road and Forest Gate.I can’t see it running via HS1 as it would not only involve a loco change at Ripple Lane (unless by some miracle the DB 92s are comfortable with running over the GOBLIN, NLL and WCML) but will be length and weight restricted over HS1’s steep gradients.
I suspect it’ll run the same way as the existing water and aluminium trains, ending up at Longhedge Jn and then via the WLL to Willesden and north along the WCML.
I don’t know anymore details of the customer etc. I have a sneaky suspicion it may involve Novatrans/Greenmodal as they have recently reinstated a large fleet of previously stored CT compliant flats for use in France. It may be me adding 2+2 and getting 5, but it seems a little bit too much of a coincidence to be reinstating CT gauge flats purely for domestic French operations.
The thread called “20901 and 20905” would be a good bet.There are a pair of Balfour Beatty class 20s coming up north to Scotland in February next year under 6J09.
They will be working a long the east coast from Dundee to Craiginches over the course of a few days with a drainage train.
however, I was wondering if anyone knows anything information about the routes prior to this or after in Scotland and if it will be doing any other work up here?
They definitely haven't stopped running...
...Whether slightly less frequently than before, I'm not sure, but maybe.