And yes, I imagine Brum and Liverpool runs will be allocated 9-cars, with 11-cars being given to Scotland and Manchester based on my interpretation of current loadings. Peak time might be interesting though! Especially as jopsuk says when a 9-car turns up instead of an 11!
I can see that working very well :/ I very much doubt the 11 coach sets will stick rigidly to the booked diagrams, which will no doubt cause reservation headaches!
Not if the two new coaches are unreserved.
However, could it not be the case that all 9 coaches of the 9 car sets would be reservable. In which case, if you had no reservation and a 9 car set showed up, you may not get a seat
aren't there any trains which are reservations compulsory? Other than the sleepers
Isn't it a requirement that all trains (regardless of TOC) must have at least one unreserved coach?
A bit off-topic but FGW used to run a few services, such as Brighton-Bristol (almost always worked by a single 158 meaning it's standing room only from Brighton) which were advertised in the timetable as 'reservation compulsory'. I've no idea whether this was enforced.
Yes, the additional "insert" carriages are both standard, see my earlier reply for their configurationHas there been any conformation of the configuration of the extra carriages? Are they both going to be Standard Class?
4-car XC Voyagers don't run with an unreserved coach, which is coach B on 5-cars.Isn't it a requirement that all trains (regardless of TOC) must have at least one unreserved coach?
What's stopping them? The train manager would just have to advise people to use a particular part of the train as they do with the East Coast HSTs when they serve stations with platforms shorter then the train or just use SDO as the FGW HSTs do.