I suppose the requirement to show paper tickets to the driver means that the driver can press a button to record the use of the Travelcard.
Not that I'm aware of. There were no notices stating that only holders of Oyster cards were able to use the rear doors! And besides, the Conductor was encouraging people to use all available doors. If he then sent someone back I'd not have been impressed (as well as contributing to further delay - the bus was already heavily delayed)A bit off-topic but just a quick question - Can you use the back platform when using a normal travelcard?
There should be a sticker advising Oyster users to touch in and those paying cash to board at the front. But it's silent on the matter of paper Travelcards.There were no notices stating that only holders of Oyster cards were able to use the rear doors!
Oyster card holders or passengers using contactless payment cards can use any of the doors to board.
In central London, many stops have a roadside ticket machine. Where such a machine is provided, passengers paying with cash must buy their ticket from the machine before boarding. Elsewhere, passengers must board through the front door and buy a ticket from the driver. Passengers with a printed Travelcard or other printed pass or ticket must use the front door and show these to the driver.
The problem with your suggestion would be when the buses are operating in DOO mode. To avoid arguments, I guess they have decided to have a consistent policy.I wonder why they don't have the centre doors for exit-only (as at present) and allow Oyster or pass holding customers to use the platform or front door; presenting verification or payment to the driver or Customer Service Assistant as appropriate. A number of people on the first day of operation were quite reluctant to use the centre doors it seems, so I don't think there'd have been much confusion had this been implemented from new.
The problem is that the information about paper Travelcard doesn't appear to be shown on the bus...http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/15493.aspx#page-link-using-the-busPassengers with a printed Travelcard or other printed pass or ticket must use the front door and show these to the driver.
I've used the Borismaster a few times and I love it. Cool and airy thanks to the air conditioning (or air cooling or whatever is installed), no rattles and shakes, the ability to hop on and off (although yet to take advantage of this I can think of situations on routes I often use where it'd be handy) and the seats are lovely and comfortable.
why so?
Really? What brings you to that conclusion?
Also you could have rear wheel steer too on the tag axle to improve manoeuvrability
I've seen a few reports of many buses breaking down and the air cons on those left breaking leaving the top deck (with no opening windows whatsoever, even with a key) roasting. Of course, probably just teething problems, but if these are as prevalent as they seem to be by what I've read, still a rather poor show.
Also, they have less capacity than smaller buses (because they're too heavy or something), and are slightly below par for fuel efficiency.
Not that I'm aware of. There were no notices stating that only holders of Oyster cards were able to use the rear doors! And besides, the Conductor was encouraging people to use all available doors. If he then sent someone back I'd not have been impressed (as well as contributing to further delay - the bus was already heavily delayed)
This is hardly news though. Even before the first prototypes hit the streets, it was said that the platform door would be closed in DOO mode - with the driver opening and closing all three sets of doors at bus stops.The closing of the platform is a big put down for me.
There's an nteresting article from Tom Edwards (BBC London's transport correspondent) about the 'green credientials' of the Boris Buses.They cost more to run than a standard bus, as they weigh far more and so use even more fuel. And they will accommodate fewer passengers than a standard bus, because of the enormous weight.
There's an nteresting article from Tom Edwards (BBC London's transport correspondent) about the 'green credientials' of the Boris Buses.
Tfl report an average of 6.74mpg for the prototype vehicles (versus 6.1mpg for the 'normal' hybrids working on route 73). Which means they use less fuel, not more.
TfL also say that the production buses are not as heavy as the prototypes and they "estimate the production vehicles will deliver approximately 1 mpg improvement on the prototype vehicles".
Emissions of NOx and particulates are claimed as a quarter of 'normal' hybrids, with CO2 emissions about 20% less.
perhaps they could be made to hover?![]()
front page of the standard, No Air con works, and no way to open any widows, like a Thai sauna on board the 24..
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/tran...ves-passengers-sweltering-in-30c-8690392.html
1mpg out of a total of 6-7 is quite a big number.