I note that you had the good sense to ensure the word "most" was incorporated in your quote above, as both my good lady wife and I, both in our mid-70s, voted "remain" in the referendum and pride ourselves that we have a very good knowledge of what the EU is and of the functions that it performs.
As did many of my aquaintances, close friends and family members. I have no issue at all with well informed people (as I’m sure you and your wife are) educating themselves on the relevant issues and voting based on a reasoned view.
Many people voluntarily give up a well paid job to take on a different job on a lower salary, that's not something unique about Farage.
Indeed, but it does rather undermine the oft repeated argument that Farage has used his tenure as an MEP to unjustly enrich himself.
UKIP have tried to come up with radical domestic policies. Remember Farage's controversial pay for doctor's appointments proposal? I'm sure most people don't think the current system is perfect and realise people forget to cancel appointments they don't need and some people make appointments for conditions which could be treated by something obtained over the pharmacist's counter. However, I'm also sure most people don't want the face the potential prospect of getting very ill and needing to attend regular appointments at huge expense so if they were sat opposite Farage when he suggested that, they would question the viability of his proposal. Yet when it's the EU people are less well informed so don't think of the counter-argument.
That was a policy with a kernel of common sense at the centre (stop people wasting drs’ time) but was clearly badly thought out. Farage’s main issue has always been the unfortunate fact that UKIP has always attracted a significant number of basket cases, crack pots and racist oddballs and he has been tarnished by association. This is a large part of why they have never been a successful force in UK politics (although IIRC they attracted more votes than the SNP at the 2010 GE, so those of a left wing persuasion calling for proportional representation should be careful what they wish for!)
I also don’t think it’s fair to say that just because UKIP were pretty misguided on the domestic side of things that their core anti EU message can be considered unsound.
The EU isn't perfect but neither is the prospect of Britain outside the single market and customs union.
I agree neither option is perfect. Which of the two is the least worst comes down to a value judgement.
Doesn't want a passport with European Union written on it. Happy to have a pension cheque that does.
Good for him.
Surely a vast majority of people who voted on both sides qualify as 'sheep', knowing absolutely nothing about the EU, and just voting on a whim/on the basis of what was put out by politicians (who I broadly regard as talking out of their backsides on both sides of the issue)
I completely agree.
But the argument up thread that the result of the referendum can be explained by the fact that lots of uninformed people voted leave would cut the other way if remain had been victorious.
This is also why referenda are generally a very bad idea and should be reserved only for constitutional matters. It also underlines why we shouldn’t have another referendum before leaving the EU.
