William3000
Member
Agree - feels that this line in a former industrial area is of sufficient length to justify heavy rail like the Northumberland Line between Newcastle and AshingtonI disagree. The demand profile will be trips aggregating along the line to the terminus, or everything starting from origin and then distributing along the corridor. That's a profile better suited to heavy rail, light rail is for people hopping on and off frequently, making lots of overlapping short trips rather than collecting everybody for the run to the city center.
Light Rail is for linking different bits of an urban area together, and a tram train is for when you need more capacity on certain sections than a normal tramway can provide. Both should have a high density of stops and not run significantly beyond the end of the greater urban area. Also, given how the alignment doesn't really serve Swadlincote, if you're building something capable of street-running, I'd leave the existing alignment for significant lengths to better serve the potential demand.
The Burton-Leicester line travels between distinct towns with clear rural areas separating them, and often is quite far from the town centers. And all of this is before you start to address the operational & regulatory issues of integrating a tram-train or light rail system on to the national heavy rail network that may carry freight.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Wow - different economic times! Imagine economists concluding that today given Cambridge’s booming economy. But I recall in the 70s 80s traffic profiles were different. Long locomotive hauled trains from the North served places like Great Yarmouth and Harwich International while Cambridge was generally only served by two car DMUsThat‘s not why the 1970s electrification stopped at Royston.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Wow - different economic times! Imagine economists concluding that today given Cambridge’s booming economy. But I recall in the 70s 80s traffic profiles were different. Long locomotive hauled trains from the North served places like Great Yarmouth and Harwich International while Cambridge was generally only served by two car DMUsThat‘s not why the 1970s electrification stopped at Royston.
Burton-upon-Trent combined with Leicester provide a pretty good geographical spread of connections. from Burton one can reach places as far afield as Edinburgh, Bournemouth, Reading, Plymouth, Cardiff, Sheffield, Derby, York, Newcastle, Birmingham, Gloucester, Oxford, and Bristol, while Leicester provides connections to Derby, Birmingham, Sheffield as well plus Stansted Airport, Cambridge, Peterborough, London, Nottingham, and Nuneaton.Both Okehampton and Borders have the double advantage of a) having one end of the line being a major station offering country-wide connections, and b) quite a bit of inbound tourism traffic.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Burton provides a huge variety of destinations. These are supplemented by Leicester surfing addition places not served by Burton-upon-TrentBoth Okehampton and Borders have the double advantage of a) having one end of the line being a major station offering country-wide connections, and b) quite a bit of inbound tourism traffic.
Last edited: