• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR to use Euston

Status
Not open for further replies.

vuzzeho

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2022
Messages
663
Location
London
Euston staff were nice and let people down onto the platform to take pictures. GWR staff was also nice, I had a good chat with someone from GWR about the diversions. Diesel for now, with electric running coming later as the electric systems on the trains are upgraded.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4089.jpg
    IMG_4089.jpg
    4.2 MB · Views: 299
  • IMG_4088.jpg
    IMG_4088.jpg
    4.7 MB · Views: 274
  • IMG_4087.jpg
    IMG_4087.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 259
  • IMG_4086.jpg
    IMG_4086.jpg
    4.7 MB · Views: 251
  • IMG_4085.jpg
    IMG_4085.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 246
  • IMG_4084.jpg
    IMG_4084.jpg
    5.1 MB · Views: 275
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Peter0124

Established Member
Joined
20 Nov 2016
Messages
2,740
Location
Glasgow
Feels good that they have the WCML, ECML, MML, HS1 and now the GWML all within a 1 mile radius of eachother. Even if its only for a few days. A superhub on Euston Road.
 

Sly Old Fox

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2008
Messages
448
Location
England
Why do the electric systems on the trains need "upgraded" to operate on electric power into Euston?

You can upgrade the systems on board the train as much as you like but you won’t get up the bank to Acton Wells without some wires up. I wonder if that is what was meant.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,227
Why do the electric systems on the trains need "upgraded" to operate on electric power into Euston?
I expect it’s the Acton Wells electrification that needs to be “provided”, rather than “upgraded”. “Current” :D thread here:
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
11,933
Location
here to eternity
You can upgrade the systems on board the train as much as you like but you won’t get up the bank to Acton Wells without some wires up. I wonder if that is what was meant.
I expect it’s the Acton Wells electrification that needs to be “provided”, rather than “upgraded”. “Current” :D thread here:

The implication was that once under the wires after going up Acton Bank the unit could not run on electric power into Euston for some reason.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,227
The implication was that once under the wires after going up Acton Bank the unit could not run on electric power into Euston for some reason.
Thats a bit weird. :D o_O A different type of electricity?
 
Last edited:

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,199
The implication was that once under the wires after going up Acton Bank the unit could not run on electric power into Euston for some reason.

Probably because the wires are currently only planned to go as far as Acton Wells Jn, the rather crucial bit down to Willesden West London Jn isn’t currently in the wiring plan (short sighted!)
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,265
Location
Bath
Probably because the wires are currently only planned to go as far as Acton Wells Jn, the rather crucial bit down to Willesden West London Jn isn’t currently in the wiring plan (short sighted!)
Also possible they don’t want to risk losing pans, as drivers aren’t used to doing moving changeovers manually. Usually they are done automatically on the GWML.
 

vuzzeho

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2022
Messages
663
Location
London
The GWR member of staff I spoke to said there were differences between the electric systems on the GWR IETs and the more modern 805/807. Something about electromagnetic interference, but he didn't go into detail. This wasn't an issue when they were built thanks to the modern GWR electrification but LNER's IETs needed their electric systems to be modified before entering service. He said GWR was upgrading the systems unit by unit, so eventually they'll be able to use the wires to Euston, or at least have the pan up in the station (after all the paperwork and applications and stuff is done). I wish I had more specific info to give you but that's what I know.
 

vuzzeho

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2022
Messages
663
Location
London

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,584
The GWR member of staff I spoke to said there were differences between the electric systems on the GWR IETs and the more modern 805/807. Something about electromagnetic interference, but he didn't go into detail. This wasn't an issue when they were built thanks to the modern GWR electrification but LNER's IETs needed their electric systems to be modified before entering service. He said GWR was upgrading the systems unit by unit, so eventually they'll be able to use the wires to Euston, or at least have the pan up in the station (after all the paperwork and applications and stuff is done). I wish I had more specific info to give you but that's what I know.
It could be to prevent them from generating frequencies that could interfere with older signalling systems.
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
3,033
Location
81D & 81E
The article reminds me of something I discussed with the guy at Euston - where are they going to put the IETs? North Pole won't be available for them and we're not exactly swimming in stabling space for 9 car trains. What could GWR do?
It might be easier to ask where they aren’t going!! They will be appearing in some unusual places. There will be quite a few IETs using Reading TCD.
 

class ep-09

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2013
Messages
631
Also possible they don’t want to risk losing pans, as drivers aren’t used to doing moving changeovers manually. Usually they are done automatically on the GWML.
Usually changeover is done manually , or rather I should say , it is always done manually across GWR network everyday .
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,015
Location
West Wiltshire
The article reminds me of something I discussed with the guy at Euston - where are they going to put the IETs? North Pole won't be available for them and we're not exactly swimming in stabling space for 9 car trains. What could GWR do?
Nearly every Sunday during September, October seem to have 2 lines out of 4 closed in West London.

Then when works are happening in West London in November, there are periods when Berks and Hants is closed, so lots of loops and bays will be empty (also closed for few days mid December)

At end of December when Paddington is closed, there are miles of closed lines in Westbury area. Although this does mean other trains are unused and littering up depots too.
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,199
It might be easier to ask where they aren’t going!! They will be appearing in some unusual places. There will be quite a few IETs using Reading TCD.

There is also the back entrance into North Pole depot…
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,899
Location
London
The article reminds me of something I discussed with the guy at Euston - where are they going to put the IETs? North Pole won't be available for them and we're not exactly swimming in stabling space for 9 car trains. What could GWR do?
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,265
Location
Bath
That is categorically untrue. They are never done automatically.
Perhaps they are just to ensure in emergencies then? But as I understand it there are eurobalises to lower the pantographs at changeover points.
 

Sly Old Fox

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2008
Messages
448
Location
England
Perhaps they are just to ensure in emergencies then? But as I understand it there are eurobalises to lower the pantographs at changeover points.

There are ‘catch’ balises that will change power from electric to diesel at the end of the wires if the driver forgets. But I have never known one to be used (in anger), drivers are firmly told it will be treated very seriously if they ever set one off.

There is nothing in place to change power from diesel to electric.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,897
Location
Mold, Clwyd
The article reminds me of something I discussed with the guy at Euston - where are they going to put the IETs? North Pole won't be available for them and we're not exactly swimming in stabling space for 9 car trains. What could GWR do?
North Pole is available, and there are ECS workings to/from Euston during the blocks involving reversals at Willesden SW Sidings and Kensington Olympia.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,265
Location
Bath
North Pole is available, and there are ECS workings to/from Euston during the blocks involving reversals at Willesden SW Sidings and Kensington Olympia.
They have also been investigating alternative stabling locations. One visited Didcot Railway Center to test it a month or so ago.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,942
Location
London
The Evening Standard article also suggests crew changes will be done at Ealing Broadway and not Reading as previously suggested, and will be an operational stop only. Maybe Reading will become less operational?

The long-distance trains will stop at Ealing Broadway for crew handovers and the lowering of the pantograph, but passengers will not be able to get off, nor will passengers on the platform at Ealing be able to board to travel to Euston.

The wiring is also in part to allow 345s to get to a maintenance depot at Ilford (without being dragged) as otherwise there’s only stabling facilities at Maidenhead or outstations.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,265
Location
Bath
Maybe Reading will become less operational?
If anything Reading will be canned.
It would be insane to stop at Reading. The current frequency has trains busy enough. With every journey planner recommending going to Euston from Reading as it will be faster you’ll end up with severe overcrowding.

I see the trains have already been given compulsory reservation flags so they’re clearly quite worried about overcrowding.
 

CyrusWuff

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
5,427
Location
London
If anything Reading will be canned.
It would be insane to stop at Reading. The current frequency has trains busy enough. With every journey planner recommending going to Euston from Reading as it will be faster you’ll end up with severe overcrowding.

I see the trains have already been given compulsory reservation flags so they’re clearly quite worried about overcrowding.
It wouldn't surprise me if additional boarding controls were put in place at Euston as well, with customers not holding seat reservations being last to board and in limited numbers.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It wouldn't surprise me if additional boarding controls were put in place at Euston as well, with customers not holding seat reservations being last to board and in limited numbers.

If only the mandatory reservation flag wasn't being misused it could be used to indicate them actually being mandatory on these...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top