• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR daily cancellations

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Parallel

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2013
Messages
4,513
Somehow due to the disruption today, the 17:25 Cardiff to Portsmouth service is formed of a 7 coach 158 between Cardiff and Bristol. The Filton Abbey Wood call has been dropped as this station can only hold five coaches of non-selective door opening stock.
 

Stigy

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2009
Messages
4,964
Somehow due to the disruption today, the 17:25 Cardiff to Portsmouth service is formed of a 7 coach 158 between Cardiff and Bristol. The Filton Abbey Wood call has been dropped as this station can only hold five coaches of non-selective door opening stock.
Why not just run it is a 4 or 5 car with the appropriate number of coaches locked out? I mean, it would only have been booked 4 or 5 coaches anyway so no passenger loading issues.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,977
Location
London
Im not underestimating the challenges but the first step is for Haigh to acknowledge there is problem at some operators and that as Passenger in Chief to say something along the lines of "im determined that we move to a 7 day railway but that will take several years to achieve and in the short term we will have to reduce services to a level that is deliverable weekend in weekend out"

It’s not so much that but the cost to the Treasury / DfT of bringing that overtime into the working week.
 

Jim

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Messages
3,489
Location
Wick
Why not just run it is a 4 or 5 car with the appropriate number of coaches locked out? I mean, it would only have been booked 4 or 5 coaches anyway so no passenger loading issues.
It was conveying the unit for 1F31, which had no driver to shunt it in to position at Bristol TM for 1F31 to start there.

Shed loads of disruption on the South Wales <> London route plus operationally at Bristol TM would've meant splitting 2 coaches, plus unlocking 3, all in 5 mins station time, shunting all the customers from one bit to the other in most cases.

In the end, other stuff went wrong and the main aim was not really met and 1F31 never ran!
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
The tax threshold is £125k, not £100k and surely even with back pay they're not going to get to remotely near that amount (or £100k for that matter). Anyway, it's only another 5p in the £ above £125k.

£100k+, and self assessment, and a marginal 60% rate, is already a dead cert for quite a few of us, even with no further overtime between now and April.

It sounds like first world problems but, given recent inflation, mortgage hikes for many etc. £100k isn’t anything like as much as is used to be!
 
Last edited:

Sly Old Fox

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2008
Messages
448
Location
England
£100k+, and self assessment, and a marginal 60% rate, is already a cert for quite a few of us, even with no further overtime between now and April.

Given recent inflation, £100k isn’t anything like as much as is used to be!

I was under the impression that self assessment began at the 45% tax rate, which is £125kish
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
I was under the impression that self assessment began at the 45% tax rate, which is £125kish


No, it begins at £100k…

You lose your personal allowance above that, 45% kicks in above that. It’s « cleaner » to go from, say, £125 - 160K.
 

LTJ87

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2008
Messages
163
I caught up in this today. An already extended journey time from Swansea to Paddington due to engineering works between Cardiff and Bridgend was eventually 4 hours & 15 mins because of additional stops after Bristol Parkway and longer dwell times due to the volume of passengers.

There was severe overcrowding after Bristol Temple Meads and a lot of shouting at passengers by platform staff at this station to get back from the train.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,288
Location
Bath
No, it begins at £100k…

You lose your personal allowance above that, 45% kicks in above that. It’s « cleaner » to go from, say, £125 - 160K.
The threshold to self assess was raised to £150k from the 23/24 tax year.
https://www.gov.uk/self-assessment-tax-returns/who-must-send-a-tax-return

Who must send a tax return​

You must send a tax return if, in the last tax year (6 April to 5 April), any of the following applied:
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,317
Is this thread about GWR cancellations or about tax bands etc for train crew? I’m getting slightly confused!
 

whoosh

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,885
It’s not so much that but the cost to the Treasury / DfT of bringing that overtime into the working week.

I think the Treasury/DfT need to bite the bullet and bring Sundays into the working week. It was done (at DfTs insistance/request) at East Midlands Trains a few years ago. But only for Drivers. Train Managers on the Midland Mainline side still have committed overtime (that they constantly beg for others to take) for Sundays, and the ex-Central side Senior Conductors are a mix of committed to work for newbies, and voluntary for legacy.

It's a mess that needs sorting, and not just at GwR.

GNER meanwhile, back in the day... got a lot done in that respect, for many many grades.


Proper negotiations need to happen.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,005
Location
Surrey
It’s not so much that but the cost to the Treasury / DfT of bringing that overtime into the working week.
So Passenger in Chief Haigh is just going to stand on the sidelines why this mess unfolds every Sunday now for the foreseeable future is hardly fixing things fast. If she can't persuade Treasury to take risk on revenue not increasing suffciently then timetables on operators who dont have Sundays in the working week need to be reduced. Yes it will be inconvenient and not a good advert for the industry but then neither is overcrowded services and i would imagine a pretty hefty bill for delay repay.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,977
Location
London
So Passenger in Chief Haigh is just going to stand on the sidelines why this mess unfolds every Sunday now for the foreseeable future is hardly fixing things fast. If she can't persuade Treasury to take risk on revenue not increasing suffciently then timetables on operators who dont have Sundays in the working week need to be reduced. Yes it will be inconvenient and not a good advert for the industry but then neither is overcrowded services and i would imagine a pretty hefty bill for delay repay.

Well effectively yes. It would cost probably £bn+ to sort and I imagine it isn't going to happen any time soon and would be a PR nightmare (I can just imagine the press headlines now...)

Timetables are already "being reduced" by cancellations, but yes if it goes on for a long-period a more realistic timetable should be built.

I don't think any of this is ideal and Sunday should absoutely be in the working week, but I'm also a realist.
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,255
Is this thread about GWR cancellations or about tax bands etc for train crew? I’m getting slightly confused!
i have long suspected the two are connected. Tax bands are (broadly) 20% up to £50k, thereafter 40% up to £125k, and 45% beyond. You can add your tax code to these amounts. It follows that as rail driver pay has risen, at above the overall industrial average, ever increasing pay amounts are falling into these higher tax bands, and being taken away again by the government. This particularly applies to voluntary overtime/Sunday work, which may be paid at a premium rate, but takes you into a higher tax band and the premium is all taken away from you again. So why bother.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Well effectively yes. It would cost probably £bn+ to sort and I imagine it isn't going to happen any time soon and would be a PR nightmare (I can just imagine the press headlines now...)

Timetables are already "being reduced" by cancellations, but yes if it goes on for a long-period a more realistic timetable should be built.

I don't think any of this is ideal and Sunday should absoutely be in the working week, but I'm also a realist.

Is she a passenger in chief? I’ve come to regard her more as a staff member in chief.

Whether that’s good or bad or not depends on your perspective, I guess :D
 

GoneSouth

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,476
£100k+, and self assessment, and a marginal 60% rate, is already a dead cert for quite a few of us, even with no further overtime between now and April.

It sounds like first world problems but, given recent inflation, mortgage hikes for many etc. £100k isn’t anything like as much as is used to be!
It’s still more than the vast majority of people are earning, some of whom do significantly harder jobs. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been a support of railway staff in general getting decent pay, but I think we’re at the limit of public sympathy when so many are passing 100k

Not your fault, but somebody has to take the hard first steps to fix this
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,005
Location
Surrey
Well effectively yes. It would cost probably £bn+ to sort and I imagine it isn't going to happen any time soon and would be a PR nightmare (I can just imagine the press headlines now...)

Timetables are already "being reduced" by cancellations, but yes if it goes on for a long-period a more realistic timetable should be built.
Its clear that on GWR and Northern just upping RDW payments will only be a short term palliative, if that, so timetables need to match likely resource availability and Haigh needs to decide what sort of railway she wants on a Sunday.
I don't think any of this is ideal and Sunday should absoutely be in the working week, but I'm also a realist.
Agreed but the Passenger in Chief can't bury her head in the sand and ignore what is happening. A realist is somebody who acknowledges the issue and sets out a plan to deal with it.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,901
Location
London
Who said she's not intending or has something in the works? Especially more so when the affected TOCs fall under GBR, which ideally would declutter a few obstacles.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It’s still more than the vast majority of people are earning, some of whom do significantly harder jobs. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been a support of railway staff in general getting decent pay, but I think we’re at the limit of public sympathy when so many are passing 100k

Not your fault, but somebody has to take the hard first steps to fix this
Careful not to fall into the all to easy trap of comparing job difficulties, especially if the comparison isn't remotely similar in variables.
 
Last edited:

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
It’s still more than the vast majority of people are earning, some of whom do significantly harder jobs.

I should hope so too. It’s a far more responsible job than most. So I would expect to earn far more than most do, for undertaking the role.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been a support of railway staff in general getting decent pay, but I think we’re at the limit of public sympathy when so many are passing 100k

Speaking as an ASLEF member, we aren’t after your sympathy, neither do we particularly require your support.

Not your fault, but somebody has to take the hard first steps to fix this

What problem do you think is going to be “fixed”, exactly?
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,977
Location
London
Agreed but the Passenger in Chief can't bury her head in the sand and ignore what is happening. A realist is somebody who acknowledges the issue and sets out a plan to deal with it.

Who said she is “burying her hand in the sand”? I am sure Labour have commented on Sunday fiascos and she’s probably been briefed on it already, if she hasn’t already had firsthand experience.

That’s not what a realist is - the issue can still be acknowledged and accepted and whilst trying to deal with it accordingly but with a full understanding of how that may be difficult to achieve, practically.
 

Stossgebet

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2024
Messages
186
Location
Midlands
Is she a passenger in chief? I’ve come to regard her more as a staff member in chief.

Whether that’s good or bad or not depends on your perspective, I guess :D
Maybe it depends on how many Sundays she has worked

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It’s still more than the vast majority of people are earning, some of whom do significantly harder jobs. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been a support of railway staff in general getting decent pay, but I think we’re at the limit of public sympathy when so many are passing 100k

Not your fault, but somebody has to take the hard first steps to fix this
They are passing 100k because of doing lots of overtime, keeping the job going, then getting 2.5 years backpay in one tax year.

They wouldn't be near 100k if they weren't going above and beyond.
 

ivanhoe

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2009
Messages
962
It's going to be difficult. Who wants to work overtime when you already work two out of three Saturdays and one out of three Sundays, and it's the school holidays and you have a chance to spend time with your kids?

Remember every other week are late shifts, so you won't see your kids then, as you leave for work before they get home, and get back often after midnight.

Would you work days off at your (limited) weekends off? Or in school holidays?
There are a number of jobs out there that require shift work at all times for far less remuneration. We as a family got used to the fact that my missus would be working either Christmas Day or New Years Eve, and weekends were a normal working day. Never mind being asked to work extra if a colleague was sick. However, she was a lowly midwife!
I have no sympathy for the action taken on the way some of our railway is run. To actually blame any of this on the current Government is ridiculous.
If you’re returning at a weekend for whatever reason, you’ve made plans based on what trains are available. You don’t make a Plan B. As for some of the financial reasons given above, see how that goes down with emergency services, the branch of your local Tesco, etc.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,087
Location
West Wiltshire
I was under the impression that self assessment began at the 45% tax rate, which is £125kish
It also begins when you have other income, eg lettings, or want to claim allowances and tax breaks (eg cost of washing a uniform at home), extra (private) pension contributions etc. And there are certain things that can move to previous tax year to smooth your tax bill. So self assessment online is often done voluntarily so reduce tax bill

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Maybe it depends on how many Sundays she has worked
The Secretary of State put out an announcement Sunday morning about the railways, so be careful about jest, suggesting doesn't do Sundays
 
Last edited:

Stigy

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2009
Messages
4,964
No, it begins at £100k…

You lose your personal allowance above that, 45% kicks in above that. It’s « cleaner » to go from, say, £125 - 160K.
You don’t lose your personal allowance all at once beyond £100k, you lose it gradually with every thousand you go over £100k so by £125k you’ve completely lost it (both physically and metaphorically:)).

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

There are a number of jobs out there that require shift work at all times for far less remuneration. We as a family got used to the fact that my missus would be working either Christmas Day or New Years Eve, and weekends were a normal working day. Never mind being asked to work extra if a colleague was sick. However, she was a lowly midwife!
I have no sympathy for the action taken on the way some of our railway is run. To actually blame any of this on the current Government is ridiculous.
If you’re returning at a weekend for whatever reason, you’ve made plans based on what trains are available. You don’t make a Plan B. As for some of the financial reasons given above, see how that goes down with emergency services, the branch of your local Tesco, etc.
No other role I’ve ever seen have shifts like train crew shifts. Shift work is one thing, our shift work is something else. Bear in mind pretty much all train crew come from other professions and haven’t always been train crew, so it’s not like we’re in a little bubble.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,005
Location
Surrey
Who said she is “burying her hand in the sand”?
Me
I am sure Labour have commented on Sunday fiascos and she’s probably been briefed on it already, if she hasn’t already had firsthand experience.
In opposition Haigh was highly critical of operators and is still after the old favourites like Avanti despite its much improved performance. She may have been briefed but i suspect wont comment on it, or even acknowledge it, as its an area she can't fix fast but it will be a festering sore.so she needs to bite the bullet and at least state that our goal is a reliable 7 day railway. This is what SoS do set policy and then leave it to the industry to come up with a solution and time line to achieve it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top