D365
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 13,157
Be interesting to see how ScotRail cope, as all the GEC fitted power cars go north of the border.
It's ironic then that Brush Loughborough are doing up those power cars
Be interesting to see how ScotRail cope, as all the GEC fitted power cars go north of the border.
Why? The rest of the power kit, alternators, rectifiers and so on, come from Brush. Only the motors came from GEC - BR's engineers managed to persuade the procurement storm troopers to leave the rest alone!It's ironic then that Brush Loughborough are doing up those power cars![]()
As the plan was to launch the Class 800's without a buffet but VTEC managed to get permission to add one is there a risk that now VTEC are having their franchise terminated early will the DfT insist the EC trains are delivered without the Foodbar fitted or would it be too late to change it now?
Also the seat colours in bright red, could the DfT insist on a more neutral colour scheme?
6.2.6 Catering
TS1630
IEP Trains must be capable of providing a range of catering services. The catering solutions provided must be capable of providing catering services at four levels:
• Level 1 - Full restaurant service or at seat first class service with meals cooked on board;
• Level 2 - Servery that provides hot and cold snacks and drinks which may be delivered by either of the following methods:
o an at seat first class service together with the replenishment of trolleys for standard class service without the provision of a Café-Bar counter service; or
o the replenishment of trolleys and the provision of a Café-Bar counter service combined together;
• Level 3 - Hot and cold snacks and drinks through a ‘Café-Bar’ style outlet; and
• Level 4 - A trolley service.
It wasn't "the plan" - the IEP technical specification from 2012 made clear that the design had to allow for a range of options when it came to catering.
DfT seems to have decided on its preferred solution of kitchen+trolley and refused to give GWR any leeway, while Virgin/Stagecoach is being allowed to have a shop. This may have something to do with GWR running a direct award franchise, as opposed to Virgin/Stagecoach having won a competitive tender process, but who knows?
I should think there are rather bigger headaches to deal with when it comes to addressing the future of the East Coast operation - hopefully including not setting wildly over-optimistic financial targets yet again - than whether or not a shop is installed on the 800s and 801s for the route or the colour of the seat fabric, though with DfT micro-management, anything's possible.
I know the spec allowed flexibility to accommodate future alternative catering options but I'm also pretty sure that the DfT wanted both franchises to go at seat service only. This is what I was hearing before VTEC was awarded the franchise and once they were awarded the franchise they entered discussions to fix a buffet on each service.
I know the spec allowed flexibility to accommodate future alternative catering options but I'm also pretty sure that the DfT wanted both franchises to go at seat service only. This is what I was hearing before VTEC was awarded the franchise and once they were awarded the franchise they entered discussions to fix a buffet on each service.
TBH I'm with the DfT on this one. Now I travel with a fair bit of technology, taking it all to the buffet and back for a coffee is a faff, I'd rather that was served at my seat. However, I would go for a DB style Bistrowagen where I could sit and pay for a light meal served on a proper plate and real glass of beer to eat/drink in. The "serving hatch" halfway house seems to me to have no real benefit at all.
If it was not discussed during the negotiations for the franchise, how do you explain that the 2014 franchise agreement states in black and white that the seating capacities of the EC IEP sets will be as follows - 303 in five-car sets and 611 in the nine-car?
Which is about 20 seats fewer than in the equivalent GW sets - it's pretty obvious what was going to go in that space.
As the plan was to launch the Class 800's without a buffet but VTEC managed to get permission to add one is there a risk that now VTEC are having their franchise terminated early will the DfT insist the EC trains are delivered without the Foodbar fitted or would it be too late to change it now?
Also the seat colours in bright red, could the DfT insist on a more neutral colour scheme?
Random question - on most trains either the nearside or offside front lights are illuminated.
Why do Class 800s have both headlights illuminated? Also, what's the purpose of the single light above the cab windscreen?
It is these regulations - which I believe are a TSI standard - that allow front ends that are not yellow. So those creating images of stuff with no yellow front might need to change the headlights on their creations.The latest regulations regarding "audibility and visibility of trains" requires that two headlights are illuminated on the front of the train, combined with a third marker light above the windscreen, forming a triangle. In years gone by, they only required one headlight, and one marker light (although post privatisation the third marker lights (or cyclops lights) started to appear) - the offside headlight being lit in the day, the nearside being lit in the night - nowadays, the headlights are either on full brightness during the day, or dimmed during the night. This can also be quite clearly seen on the 700s and 345s. Hitachi are going above and beyond by illuminating both headlights and both marker lights on the 800s, as well as the high level marker light - you'd be hard pressed to miss them!
Yes been a fair few complaints from drivers being dazzled both day and night by 800s, seels they have been dimmed a bit more lately presumably as a result. I do wonder if those who are planning on having none yellow fronts will be allowed to run with the headlights in "dimmed" mode. .......The latest regulations regarding "audibility and visibility of trains" requires that two headlights are illuminated on the front of the train, combined with a third marker light above the windscreen, forming a triangle. In years gone by, they only required one headlight, and one marker light (although post privatisation the third marker lights (or cyclops lights) started to appear) - the offside headlight being lit in the day, the nearside being lit in the night - nowadays, the headlights are either on full brightness during the day, or dimmed during the night. This can also be quite clearly seen on the 700s and 345s. Hitachi are going above and beyond by illuminating both headlights and both marker lights on the 800s, as well as the high level marker light - you'd be hard pressed to miss them!
Low tech enough not to have a door handle on inside , mk2d had interior handles and fastened up drop lights until people started falling out, sadly the first was an 11 yo who diedYes not likely to be problem HST's would have had at launch with their low tech door system.
Low tech enough not to have a door handle on inside , mk2d had interior handles and fastened up drop lights until people started falling out, sadly the first was an 11 yo who died
All sorts of interesting new stuff to see from the WLL today!
A 9-car Class 800 set at North Pole, on the curve up to the WLL at approx 1400, if anyone is interested. Sorry, didn't see which one.
I've had all those plus 800 013 for haulage.
With four diagrams there's 8 in service on any one day so there must be at least 2 or 3 more commissioned.
Msny thanks for the info....more to come soon no doubt.I think that at the moment it is 800005-800015 (not including 800007)
Oh good, painted as well.The first coaches of IEP040/800304 have started to appear outside at Aycliffe.
Coaches are :-
821004-822004-828004-829004.
View attachment 40154 View attachment 40155

Oh good, painted as well.![]()