• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Formula 1

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster
The 2 circuits coming up that will probably decide the title are Monza and Singapore. The Red Bull should go very well at the former, but as Monaco showed, the car isn't suited to tight and twisty street circuits, so a good result at the latter will be a big bonus for Verstappen.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
913
Sargeant gone.
Sargeant's second season in Formula 1 has been cut short ahead of this weekend's Italian Grand Prix, where Colapinto will make his competitive debut having previously driven for Williams in practice at the British Grand Prix in July.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,470
Location
at the end of the high and low roads

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,470
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Williams were talking to Mercedes about using Mick Schumacher for the rest of the season. Obviously they think they still have enough money spare for repairs! :lol:
Crikey! I'd have thought they'd be better off asking Red Bull for a loan of Liam Lawson, though taking of Mercedes maybe Toto would lend Kimi Antonelli so they could gauge how he handles F1 for real?
 

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster
From what I saw on the BBC website, Mercedes don't want Antonelli to race just yet, instead concentrating on their test program, while Red Bull don't want Lawson to drive for Williams, as there is doubts over the futures of both Perez and Ricciardo.

After the crash at Zandvoort, team principal James Vowles went to speak to Mercedes boss Toto Wolff and Red Bull's Christian Horner about the availability of some of the drivers on their roster.

But Red Bull reserve driver Liam Lawson might not have been available for all the remaining races as uncertainty hangs over the futures of both Sergio Perez at Red Bull and Daniel Ricciardo at second team RB.

At Mercedes, team boss Toto Wolff said at the Dutch Grand that he had decided their Italian protege Andrea Kimi Antonelli, who is expected to race for the team next year, should not have his preparations in Mercedes test cars disrupted.

And Williams had already turned down Mercedes reserve driver Mick Schumacher last winter, preferring to keep Sargeant.

So Vowles decided to stick with the team's young driver programme, and promote Colapinto for what will be a nine-race cameo.

 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,157
what’s the point of a test/reserve driver if a team won’t run said test/reserve driver. Good on Williams.
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,650
Location
York
Good news for Williams. As much as I loved Logan’s lack of kilometre knowledge, this new kid deserves his chance to impress, in case Albon or Sainz finds a route out in a couple of years.

My understanding is that Williams wanted to loan Lawson, but Red Bull demanded a recall option so that fell through, and Mick was never fully on the cards with Colapinto next in line
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
Sargeant wa son borrowed time. You cant smash up the car time and again AND be useless compared to your team mate and survive even if you do bring in lots of coin.

My understanding is that Williams wanted to loan Lawson, but Red Bull demanded a recall option so that fell through, and Mick was never fully on the cards with Colapinto next in line

Same here - plus you can hardly sack one driver for smashing up the car and then employee a proven car smasher! Also I don't think Antonelli was an option. I am not sure he is ready.
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,650
Location
York
Same here - plus you can hardly sack one driver for smashing up the car and then employee a proven car smasher! Also I don't think Antonelli was an option. I am not sure he is ready.
My initial thoughts were that Toto would entertain a Williams loan but Antonelli wants to see out his F2 season. Personally I’d have given him next year at Williams but I recognise that Carlos and Albon was a pairing they couldn’t miss out on
 

Cloud Strife

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2014
Messages
2,962
Didn't there used to be a rule about not setting a time in qualifying that the other teams had to agree to the driver being allowed to take part in the race also? Is that rule still in place?

It's still in place, but it hasn't been enforced for over 10 years. The stewards generally just let people race, as there's no real reason to enforce it unless a driver is absolutely horrible and hasn't come anywhere near the 107% at some point during the weekend.
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,650
Location
York
The fact they didn't worries me - if he is the coming man why not give him a shot as an experience builder for the rest of the year?
From interviews, Antonelli has seemed slightly unconfident so I think he wanted a full year in F2. F4 to F1 in half a season is a daunting prospect for anyone, never mind a 17-18yo
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
From interviews, Antonelli has seemed slightly unconfident so I think he wanted a full year in F2. F4 to F1 in half a season is a daunting prospect for anyone, never mind a 17-18yo
i get that but it is still a hell of a step up from F2 to Mercedes F1!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

and the kid has stuffed it into the wall in FP1................
 
Last edited:

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster
Missed opportunity for McLaren and Lando Norris today. Verstappen could only finish 6th, but for whatever reason, Norris and Piastri were not switched around on the final lap.

Great strategy from Ferrari though to get the win.

1 final note. Very poor from Channel 4 today. The highlights program was only an hour, actual highlights didn't start until 10 minutes it, and were completed after 30 minutes, which included 3 advert breaks.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,797
Location
Epsom
1 final note. Very poor from Channel 4 today. The highlights program was only an hour, actual highlights didn't start until 10 minutes it, and were completed after 30 minutes, which included 3 advert breaks.
I think they were trying to pretend that they couldn't delay any paralympic coverage by 30 minutes!:rolleyes:

On the plus side, it did mean none of the usual waffle before the race bits. :)
 

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster
The other thing about C4 today, they made no mention of Kevin Magnussen forcing Gasly of the track, picking up a penalty for that, and being banned for the Azerbaijan GP
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
I am amazed Ferrari made the one stopper work - fair play to them.

Also Piastri was a bit punchy with Norris but it is clear McLaren don't have any teams orders beyond "papaya rules" aka ffs don't crash into each other. I find that odd as Norris has a chance ( slim but possible ) of winning the drivers championship.

1 final note. Very poor from Channel 4 today. The highlights program was only an hour, actual highlights didn't start until 10 minutes it, and were completed after 30 minutes, which included 3 advert breaks.
Channel 4 F1 coverage is almost unwatchable - a 17 hour long pre show, 12 minutes of highlights and 17 hours of adverts. ZZZZZZZ

I listen to the race on radio 5/bbc sports website and a listen to a few podcasts now. I wont pay for sky.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,080
Location
Wilmslow
Channel 4 F1 coverage is almost unwatchable - a 17 hour long pre show, 12 minutes of highlights and 17 hours of adverts. ZZZZZZZ

I listen to the race on radio 5/bbc sports website and a listen to a few podcasts now. I wont pay for sky.
I pay for Sky for the cricket, so F1 is a bonus, but its coverage is good - I can't watch C4 any more because I can't tolerate the presenter, maybe like my aversion to snails, I used to be fine but can't eat them any more. He's unwatchable to me.

However the Sky cricket coverage is more and more about T20 and The Hundred and I don't like these formats either, so perhaps I'll stop paying, and then F1 will go out of the window too.
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,887
Location
West Country
I listen to the race on radio 5/bbc sports website and a listen to a few podcasts now. I wont pay for sky.
A middle ground I've managed to be satisfied with is to share a NowTV sports subscription with two other friends. The boost add-on allows three simultaneous streams (in HD) and the monthly cost of the subscription works out at about £11/month for each of us, which is an amount I find tolerable.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,449
Location
Isle of Man
I am amazed Ferrari made the one stopper work - fair play to them.

Also Piastri was a bit punchy with Norris but it is clear McLaren don't have any teams orders beyond "papaya rules" aka ffs don't crash into each other. I find that odd as Norris has a chance ( slim but possible ) of winning the drivers championship.
I genuinely think letting the two of them race cost McLaren a 1-2 yesterday. Norris stuck behind Leclerc led to the early stop, the early stop led to a 2-stop race. Fair play to Leclerc for making the 1-stop work despite stopping the lap after Norris and the lap before Piastri, a very impressive drive given how Sainz's newer tyres dropped off more quickly.

That 1-2 becoming a 2-3 cost them 10 points and after Monza they're only 8 points behind Red Bull.

I don't blame Piastri for getting punchy but I can't believe 'papaya rules' aren't that whoever leads into the first corner isn't challenged.

As for Norris, he needs to be more ruthless. Hamilton and Verstappen would both have yeeted a team-mate into the wall if they'd tried that on them.

As for the TV coverage, when I want to watch I find a dodgy stream which I'm sure is using my laptop to mine for Monero or Dogecoin or something. I'd rather give my money to Vladimir Putin than Rupert Murdoch; Putin is less evil.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,887
Location
Fenny Stratford
I don't blame Piastri for getting punchy but I can't believe 'papaya rules' aren't that whoever leads into the first corner isn't challenged.
agreed but it should be Piastri, you have 2 jobs: 1) make sure Verstappen is behind you at all times and 2) get the car to the flag. We want both championships.

As for Norris, he needs to be more ruthless. Hamilton and Verstappen would both have yeeted a team-mate into the wall if they'd tried that on them.
I am sure they have been told very firmly that McLaren want 2 cars home. Verstappen absolutely would have his team mate off but RB aren't worried about the constructors title. It was nice when Norris gave him it back a bit as Verstappen has got away for too long with yield or crash tactics.
 

sannox

Member
Joined
1 Mar 2016
Messages
649
I felt that was a bit silly yesterday. An extra 10 points for Norris would be 50-odd points to Verstappen and utterly game on.
 

Top