Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Train services seem more certain and predictable, even if thats not the case all the time. Id rather wait in a railway station , than a bus stop next to a busy road, ' oh the neighbours , work colleagues will see me waiting for the bus' .
Yeah I stay near 2 busy roads and it's a nightmare. The only thing that helps near me is that all of the buses are frequent so reliability being bad is far less of an issue
Yeah I stay near 2 busy roads and it's a nightmare. The only thing that helps near me is that all of the buses are frequent so reliability being bad is far less of an issue
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Few funny things happened yesterday.
Was on 6 from Union St to East Kilbride. Noticed on bus stop bus time display the next 6 was a Busby only one. Right after a 6 rolls in with East Kibride on front !
Get to the flyover at the Holiday Inn, East Kilbride. Driver stops the bus, turns out this bus was the Busby terminator and he forgot. I could of walked home from there but needed to go aldi, luckily a 6 came five mins later.
Secondly , i ramdomly took the 29 from Shawlands to Newton Mearns, Few people using it to Hillpark (Strange wee scheme in middle of big houses) . I was only person after Hillpark and driver didnt know the route in Newton Mearns , neither did i . I didnt have data on my phone and no wifi, must be hassle using wi fi .
Wondering how this route is still going rather the the 31 etc.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Few funny things happened yesterday.
Was on 6 from Union St to East Kilbride. Noticed on bus stop bus time display the next 6 was a Busby only one. Right after a 6 rolls in with East Kibride on front !
Get to the flyover at the Holiday Inn, East Kilbride. Driver stops the bus, turns out this bus was the Busby terminator and he forgot. I could of walked home from there but needed to go aldi, luckily a 6 came five mins later.
Secondly , i ramdomly took the 29 from Shawlands to Newton Mearns, Few people using it to Hillpark (Strange wee scheme in middle of big houses) . I was only person after Hillpark and driver didnt know the route in Newton Mearns , neither did i . I didnt have data on my phone and no wifi, must be hassle using wi fi .
Wondering how this route is still going rather the the 31 etc.
The 29/29A/129 is an SPT tender but it was always fairly busy when I used it before Covid. Tend to get a lot of older folk using it from Shawlands to Mansewood/Hillpark and then a few from there into Newton Mearns for the Asda
Scotstoun had them, i seen one on the 6a other week. Not had one on 6 for a long time, maybe not even this year. They were unreliable even when new. Slippy seats too.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
The 29/29A/129 is an SPT tender but it was always fairly busy when I used it before Covid. Tend to get a lot of older folk using it from Shawlands to Mansewood/Hillpark and then a few from there into Newton Mearns for the Asda
Scotstoun had them, i seen one on the 6a other week. Not had one on 6 for a long time, maybe not even this year. They were unreliable even when new. Slippy seats too.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Pokey wee route. I mind it used to go to City Centre.
The evening and Sunday 129s go to the city centre from Mansewood but other than that it doesn't really need to anymore. 38 is a lot quicker to Newton Mearns and there's a fair load of buses to Shawlands from the city centre
The 129 was actually busy coming out the City up to Shawlands most evenings. On occasions it could have a standing load as anybody going from Town to Shawlands would jump on it. There was regulars late on used it Shawlands to Hillpark.
The 129 was actually busy coming out the City up to Shawlands most evenings. On occasions it could have a standing load as anybody going from Town to Shawlands would jump on it. There was regulars late on used it Shawlands to Hillpark.
Yeah I used it once in the evenings when out a wander about 3 or 4 years ago and it was decently loaded. Think there's so many buses during the day in normal circumstances though so it would be a waste of resources to fund it to the city centre then. Feel like it's one of those services that's constantly been with First except the switch due to covid
Yeah I used it once in the evenings when out a wander about 3 or 4 years ago and it was decently loaded. Think there's so many buses during the day in normal circumstances though so it would be a waste of resources to fund it to the city centre then. Feel like it's one of those services that's constantly been with First except the switch due to covid
Today? Whilst I wouldn't take bustimes.org as being the most accurate source of information they do list 67711-15, 67717, 67719, 67721-26, 67728-29, 67731-33, 67766-69 and 67771 as having been on various variants of 'the one' today which is by far the majority of Dumbarton's allocation. Don't know if the extras between Clydebank and the City are still running to know what is on those though.
Today? Whilst I wouldn't take bustimes.org as being the most accurate source of information they do list 67711-15, 67717, 67719, 67721-26, 67728-29, 67731-33, 67766-69 and 67771 as having been on various variants of 'the one' today which is by far the majority of Dumbarton's allocation. Don't know if the extras between Clydebank and the City are still running to know what is on those though.
First Glasgow are currently running a number of additional buses on 'the one' between the city centre and Clydebank. Seen on Kilbowie Road awaiting their departure times are Wright bodied Volvos 69119 and 69121.
First Glasgow are currently running a number of additional buses on 'the one' between the city centre and Clydebank. Seen on Kilbowie Road awaiting their departure times are Wright bodied Volvos 69119 and 69121.
Depends if a) they LEZ is deferred at all and b) if the PVR drops as services are cut. Way too early to be talking about new vehicles and may well need support from the government, as the job cuts at ADL suggest.
It'll be interesting to see how many buses First choose to buy in for Glasgow for the LEZ. Alexander Dennis having problems and job cuts won't help either tbh. Probably a lot of transfers into Glasgow plus service cuts will cover what's needed
It'll be interesting to see how many buses First choose to buy in for Glasgow for the LEZ. Alexander Dennis having problems and job cuts won't help either tbh. Probably a lot of transfers into Glasgow plus service cuts will cover what's needed
You say that but the full B7TL fleet are up for renewal as are the B7RLEs within the next few years. That’s not including the pre-2005 stuff still running around. I get certain services have been reduced/axed however there is still a deadline looming and not every bus on the road just now will be retrofitted. I highly doubt the B9TLs will be done as some of them are about 13 years old already. They account for a massive amount of the fleet. New stock must be due
B9TLs are solid buses and First, I believe, aim for a usable lifespan of 18 years on their vehicles so that's another 5-6 years for a big part of the double decker fleet. Not the least likely to be fitted.
You say that but the full B7TL fleet are up for renewal as are the B7RLEs within the next few years. That’s not including the pre-2005 stuff still running around. I get certain services have been reduced/axed however there is still a deadline looming and not every bus on the road just now will be retrofitted. I highly doubt the B9TLs will be done as some of them are about 13 years old already. They account for a massive amount of the fleet. New stock must be due
The funding is for over 160 buses. This plus the buses that are already Euro 6 will allow the target for the next stage of LEZ to be met. There will be no new buses for the foreseeable future. Costs have to be cut. The government funding of services is due to end in November.
As I've said elsewhere, the government should not be cutting the funding until they allow for full capacity to return. The operators should not have to pay for running half-empty buses because guidelines force them to.
If the 160 is approved, and the fleet size reduction envisaged does happen, they may not need to buy that many new buses in future to meet the full LEZ bus requirements.
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.