a class 67 is technically 10 to 15 years old ..... a 57 is decades older!What amazes me is that 57s are technically only 10-15 years old - surely they shouldn't have so many issues at that age?
a class 67 is technically 10 to 15 years old ..... a 57 is decades older!What amazes me is that 57s are technically only 10-15 years old - surely they shouldn't have so many issues at that age?
After the HST PCs were detached at Plymouth, it was discovered 57310 had lost 3/4 of it's coolant so had to run 57603 round.
Any updates guys, been interesting reading.
1C99 Down Sleeper delayed 188 mins in Swindon area last night, but not Loco this time. A defective coach which involved awakening and transferring the passengers and detaching the defective vehicle which was shunted to sidings at Swindon. There were 2 locos on the train, 57310 on rear as insurance as 57602, the front loco, was on it's first trip after returning to service after a spell out. Could possibly have come in handy for shunting.
Two power cars sandwiched together, quiet 57310, the Night Riviera stock with the seated coaches at the London end and the berths at the Penzance end (normally other way round, I guess it must have been turned somewhere recently), and noisy 57602 have just gone through Exeter SD, presumably London-bound.
Two power cars sandwiched together, quiet 57310, the Night Riviera stock with the seated coaches at the London end and the berths at the Penzance end (normally other way round, I guess it must have been turned somewhere recently), and noisy 57602 have just gone through Exeter SD, presumably London-bound.
and 57310s engine kept shutting down (again) when they started it up to run it round in Plymouth.Thanks for the info 455driver - the situation with these 57s over the last few months and the reliability of the service as a result has been dreadful and to be honest, looking from the outside, pretty embarrassing.
I wonder what some of the regular users of the service think, and to what extent this spate of poor reliability is pushing people away from the service, who choose to either fly or take a normal train and stay overnight.
Hope it's not a crafty ploy so they can be rid of the sleeper service![]()
If I had written that there woulf have been quite a few 4 letter words beginning with F in there!Thanks for the info 455driver - the situation with these 57s over the last few months and the reliability of the service as a result has been dreadful and to be honest, looking from the outside, pretty embarrassing.
I wonder what some of the regular users of the service think, and to what extent this spate of poor reliability is pushing people away from the service, who choose to either fly or take a normal train and stay overnight.
Nah, it's their secret plan to create the first HST sleeper. Just need to whip the M-G sets out of the SLEPs and through-connect the 415 buses.![]()
Set up tonight will consist of hire in DRS 57303 on the Up Sleeper, And the two HST PCs involved in today's up rescue move leading 57603 on the Down Sleeper as far as Plymouth tonight. Running in pre Christmas rescue formation HST + 57603 + Night Riviera.
As a further question, what was the original design life for the 57's? They're now between 11 and 17 years old since they were rebuilt, notwithstanding the refurbished component parts are significantly older (47, EMD engine, 56 alternator).
I'm pretty sure I read that it was refurbished EMD engines which were new in the 1970s put into them, to keep costs down. That's HST Valenta territory, in terms of age, but no way of knowing how hard a life those engines had prior to landing in the 57s. Hopefully the alternators and traction motors got a deep refurb/rebuild when the 57s were created, and electric motors & alternators can go on almost indefinitely if the heavy bits were well manufactured and they get the correct care in terms of maint, refurb, and rebuild (and are not thrashed to death, obviously).
It sounds like the problems are mostly engine-ish, so could be that the EMD lumps are basically knackered now.
probably some of these were donors!Just got me thinking, does anyone know what those reconditioned engines would have come out of before the 57s received them?
What a shambles. FGW must be tearing their hair out ...... it's bad enough their own 57/6's conking out, but DRS aren't covering themselves in glory with the 57/3's used as cover. As I've said earlier in the thread, someone must be tapping up DBS for the 67's by now ..... how hard can it be to provide 4 reliable ETH-fitted diesel locomotives??!!
As a further question, what was the original design life for the 57's? They're now between 11 and 17 years old since they were rebuilt, notwithstanding the refurbished component parts are significantly older (47, EMD engine, 56 alternator).
DRS 57312 is on the move from Willesden to Old Oak Common, possibly another FGW hire in?
312 would seem an odd choice, being "Solway Princess". Would Belmond have to give the nod for it to be used on the sleeper? Particularly as the service has become something of a magnet for poor publicity of late.Replacing 57310, hopefully, I believe
