• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EU Referendum: The result and aftermath...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
It isn't and we aren't.




Well done for making a number of idiotic assumptions about Brexiters. You must be proud.



We're still in the EU and the consequences of Brexit remain to be seen.

Apart from that, good.

You'd be convincing me more if you didn't spend most of your post being offended...

And no, the consequences are playing out pretty much exactly as expected. Hiding behind the "long-term" is silly - we're all dead in the long-term, right?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
But the EU isn't a single country.........................YET!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


Accepted

It's very obvious you're just repeating what you heard from UKIP, and struggle to defend it when challenged.
 

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
And no, the consequences are playing out pretty much exactly as expected.

Consequences. You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

Traditionally, consequences are something that happen after an event. Do you accept that Brexit hasn't happened yet?

Hiding behind the "long-term" is silly - we're all dead in the long-term, right?

So you only ever make short-sighted decisions based on immediate gratification and never plan for the future?

That's fine. You do you.

But the people of Britain have chosen to do what's best for the country in the long term. Future generations will thank us.
 

Harbornite

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2016
Messages
3,627
Consequences. You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

Traditionally, consequences are something that happen after an event. Do you accept that Brexit hasn't happened yet?



So you only ever make short-sighted decisions based on immediate gratification and never plan for the future?

That's fine. You do you.

But the people of Britain have chosen to do what's best for the country in the long term. Future generations will thank us.


But there have been consequences for Britain's decision to leave.
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
Nobody's denying that, but the consequences of Brexit remain to be seen as we haven't left yet.

After the Brexit vote. I can't work out whether the pedantry is to absolve yourself of responsibility, or because it makes you feel clever? Either way it completely misses the point.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
So you only ever make short-sighted decisions based on immediate gratification and never plan for the future?

That's fine. You do you.

But the people of Britain have chosen to do what's best for the country in the long term. Future generations will thank us.

I was referencing something Keynes said. No-one is suggesting that only short-term decisions are good, but relying on long-term consequences whilst disregarding short-term ones on the everlasting promise that things will be alright in the end is naive at best, and wilfully damaging at worst.

The people have Britain were also lied to, but then it is quite funny to see lots of you running away from claims you were proudly making little more than a month ago. Funny how you say they'll thank us whilst in the same breath deny we know the consequences yet, too. :lol::roll: I'm sensing a lot of wishful thinking and aggrandising rhetoric with little substance, yet again...
 
Last edited:

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
After the Brexit vote. I can't work out whether the pedantry is to absolve yourself of responsibility, or because it makes you feel clever? Either way it completely misses the point.

This seems to be a recurrent theme with you on these threads...

TheKnightWho: [lazy, inaccurate anti-Brexit slur]

Brexiter: Actually, that lazy, inaccurate anti-Brexit slur is lazy and inaccurate.

TheKnightWho: Oh, stop being pedantic.

Funny how you say they'll thank us whilst in the same breath deny we know the consequences yet, too.

Fair enough, you've got me bang to rights guv'nor.

I'll leave the psychic predictions to the remain side from now on.

There will be consequences though.

Yes. And they will happen in the future.
 
Last edited:

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
This seems to be a recurrent theme with you on these threads...

TheKnightWho: [lazy, inaccurate anti-Brexit slur]

Brexiter: Actually, that lazy, inaccurate anti-Brexit slur is lazy and inaccurate.

TheKnightWho: Oh, stop being pedantic.

What? You made an irrelevant point about the current consequences not technically being after Brexit, despite them having everything to do with it. What does that have to do with "lazy, inaccurate anti-Brexit slur"?

The self-victimisation from you really is astounding though. It does make me laugh when it comes from the people who always call others oversensitive. (And before you get all oversensitive yourself, I'm not always talking about you. ;))

It is quite frustrating when you, and others, concentrate on a side remark rather than the main point - making yourself out to be the poor victim does seem to take priority over good arguments, frankly.

Fair enough, you've got me bang to rights guv'nor.

I'll leave the psychic predictions to the remain side from now on.



Yes. And they will happen in the future.

Are you completely ignorant of what has been going on for the last month, or are you just desperately telling yourself that it won't last?
 

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
Are you completely ignorant of what has been going on for the last month, or are you just desperately telling yourself that it won't last?

You're the one with the PPE degree, so if you're telling me that it's mathematically impossible for the damage caused by the current period of uncertainty to be reversed post-Brexit I'll defer to your superior knowledge on the subject.

Oh wait, you don't have a degree in PPE do you? It's Politics and Philosophy, but not Economics, right?

Maybe that means that the damage caused by the current period of uncertainty can be reversed post-Brexit after all?
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
You're the one with the PPE degree, so if you're telling me that it's mathematically impossible for the damage caused by the current period of uncertainty to be reversed post-Brexit I'll defer to your superior knowledge on the subject.

Oh wait, you don't have a degree in PPE do you? It's Politics and Philosophy, but not Economics, right?

Maybe that means that the damage caused by the current period of uncertainty can be reversed post-Brexit after all?

No-one is saying it is mathematically impossible - however, the signs are not indicating that it will happen. Are you trying to argue that we have zero predictive powers at all?

I don't see why the exact nature of my degree is relevant to you - it is PPE, but the vast majority of people specialise in two.
 

Hornet

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2013
Messages
748

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford

That's why I didn't call it that. ;)
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
A reduction in the value of the pound turned out to be beneficial, the UK economy actually recovered strongly and unemployment fell sharply.

Food for thought for those who think that the fall in the pound 'proves' that Brexit has already failed.

Evidence for these claims?

The FTSE100 and FTSE250 naturally rose with the falling pound because they're multinational companies, although the FTSE250 less so as it is more domestic than the former. Measures of domestic activity show it has fallen rapidly, and our growth estimate has been cut.

No clue where your unemployment claims are coming from.
 

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
Evidence for these claims?

The FTSE100 and FTSE250 naturally rose with the falling pound because they're multinational companies, although the FTSE250 less so as it is more domestic than the former. Measures of domestic activity show it has fallen rapidly, and our growth estimate has been cut.

No clue where your unemployment claims are coming from.

I was talking about the aftermath of black Wednesday.
 

Mvann

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2010
Messages
790
Location
Peterborough
Just read huffington post article about article 50. Confirms that it was never meant to be used.

As for consequences and later generations thanking us, I'd wait and see what the EUs response to the S&P report I posted last night is.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,961
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
A reduction in the value of the pound turned out to be beneficial, the UK economy actually recovered strongly and unemployment fell sharply.

Food for thought for those who think that the fall in the pound 'proves' that Brexit has already failed.

Between July 1991 and Sep 1992, the unemployment rate rose from 9.2% to 9.7%. Following Black Wednesday, it then climbed to 10.7% by Jan 1993 and then only gradually fell until it reached it's former level (9.7%) by March 1994

I'm not asking you to predict the future but you might be expected to get historical fact right?
 

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
Between July 1991 and Sep 1992, the unemployment rate rose from 9.2% to 9.7%. Following Black Wednesday, it then climbed to 10.7% by Jan 1993 and then only gradually fell until it reached it's former level (9.7%) by March 1994

I'm not asking you to predict the future but you might be expected to get historical fact right?

Here's a graph showing UK unemployment from the day we left the ERM in 1992 to the day Tony Blair became PM in 1997. Still want to argue that the UK economy didn't recover from Black Wednesday?

united-kingdom-unemployment-rate.png
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
Here's a graph showing UK unemployment from the day we left the ERM in 1992 to the day Tony Blair became PM in 1997. Still want to argue that the UK economy didn't recover from Black Wednesday?

united-kingdom-unemployment-rate.png

Was Black Wednesday caused by a permanent shift in the economic foundation of the country?

The argument "the economy has grown after problems before" is quite generic...
 

RichmondCommu

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2010
Messages
6,906
Location
Richmond, London
A reduction in the value of the pound turned out to be beneficial, the UK economy actually recovered strongly and unemployment fell sharply.

Food for thought for those who think that the fall in the pound 'proves' that Brexit has already failed.

Have you ever considered the effects that a weak pound has on imports, inflation and interest rates?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
What about companies that currently only export to the USA that currently have to meet EU regs AND then bolt on more regs to suit the USA?

Can you name any of those companies?
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,961
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Here's a graph showing UK unemployment from the day we left the ERM in 1992 to the day Tony Blair became PM in 1997. Still want to argue that the UK economy didn't recover from Black Wednesday?

united-kingdom-unemployment-rate.png

Again, some selective amnesia. I too looked at the self same graph.

You said "A reduction in the value of the pound turned out to be beneficial, the UK economy actually recovered strongly and unemployment fell sharply."

My point was that you failed to acknowledge that a) it went up very sharply in the aftermath and b) it took a considerable time to get back down to the pre BW level

You could argue otherwise, but thankfully you that posted a graph.... :roll:
 

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
Again, some selective amnesia. I too looked at the self same graph.

You said "A reduction in the value of the pound turned out to be beneficial, the UK economy actually recovered strongly and unemployment fell sharply."

My point was that you failed to acknowledge that a) it went up very sharply in the aftermath and b) it took a considerable time to get back down to the pre BW level

What does the word "recovered" mean to you?

You seem to think that "recovered" and "immediately improved" mean the same thing. They don't.
 

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,518
Location
Southampton
TheKnightWho said:
We recovered from the Great Depression. Going to argue that was a good thing as well?
Perhaps it is seen like a forest fire. The dead wood is cleared and something new will rise from the ashes! :D
 

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
We recovered from the Great Depression. Going to argue that was a good thing as well?

Nope.

Going to argue that a rise in unemployment of 1 percentage point over a period of five months, followed by years of falling unemployment is in any way, shape or form comparable to the Great Depression?
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,961
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
What does the word "recovered" mean to you?

You seem to think that "recovered" and "immediately improved" mean the same thing. They don't.

No, you just seemed to ignore any downside, like the steep climb in unemployment and consequent surge in house repossessions. Still, sure it was "a price worth paying"....

Oh, and that miserable 1% you mentioned actually equated to 250,000 people out of work
 
Last edited:

Gutfright

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2016
Messages
639
No, you just seemed to ignore any downside, like the steep climb in unemployment and consequent surge in house repossessions. Still, sure it was "a price worth paying"....

Oh, and that miserable 1% you mentioned actually equated to 250,000 people out of work

So you would have preferred a scenario where the number of unemployed people remained at 1992 levels throughout the entire nineties then?

Bit weird. I don't know why you love high unemployment so much, but each to their own I guess.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,961
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
So you would have preferred a scenario where the number of unemployed people remained at 1992 levels throughout the entire nineties then?

Bit weird. I don't know why you love high unemployment so much, but each to their own I guess.

I don't love it; my mother and my sister both were out of work at the time but you seem blasé about it. No worries about such stuff as it all worked eh... Price worth paying
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top