RichmondCommu
Established Member
Because they are easier to maintain and replace.
Sherlock strikes again.
Because they are easier to maintain and replace.
Of course there are :roll: For instance you may have heard of TATA (AFA Corus AFA British Steel) at Scunthorpe. They still make a bit of rail........
Have you thought that it might be a specialist piece of equipment that has to be made "bespoke" and the only available capacity was in Germany?
Someone mentioned a foundry making a bespoke part. Does this mean the frogs are castings? Or forged?
Historically, have they always been made thus? I always imagined they were fabricated from rail, mitred together and probably welded along the join, though the fasteners would hold it pretty still anyway.
I've noticed the ones for the scissors outside Fenchurch St look like castings. Again, in my imagination, I pondered whether that allowed the drop for the wheel to be reduced by building up the material in the gap between the rails in the frog, so the wheel could effectively run on the tip of its flange. If that's a good idea.
You would also think that NR Procurement would have potential suppliers lined up for emergency manufacture of critical items of this nature that are not kept in stock, so they can turn to them at a moment's notice. Standard practice in sophisticated engineering. And by all accounts above it was a known problem piece for days before it failed, so they could have already been on the job.
What happened to the facility at Sandiacre near Nottingham, which I seem to recall could do this stuff effortlessly?
Sherlock strikes again.
not sure there's any need for such an attitude for someone asking a simple question. That's the purpose of this forum I thought? look I can roll my eyes at you too. :roll:
And in other news ...
Due to a broken down train, services between Victoria and Dartford which have already been diverted via Sidcup are now being diverted by ... yep, Bexleyheath!
That is fine if you are prepared to pay a company to keep open capacity in their facility to manufacture, at short notice, one off pieces. Does that offer you, as a customer good value for money? This is not a piece you can just knock together in a few days, nor can you keep a huge number of one off bespoke components to hand in the hope that they are used. To keep a duplicate of every non standard item on the network “just in case” would be a monumental task.
Imagine if one of BTs main telephone exchanges was down for a month because they lacked a spare part leaving half a city with no phones, or if a failed major substation was down for a month for the lack of a spare part leaving half a city without electricity.
But no one is without a train service. Plenty of substations - even power stations - do go off line unplanned, for months. The electricity goes another way. Same with the trains in this case.
Anyway, the delay payments for this will not be millions - not even close. Just buying the 'spare parts' for this junction alone, to leave on the ground, would cost roughly half a million. Do that for every non standard junction in, say, Kent, and you can multiply that by at least 50. That's one hell of an insurance policy to buy.
The schedule 4 payments will be through the roof I reckon.
TFL acceptance was between Vic-Cannon St the last time I looked.
That depends how big the house is.
50 years ago the railways were chock full of all sorts of unique non standard pointwork and diamond crossovers (eg the famous Newcastle station throat) and things were not shut for a month when the track failed. Even after bomb attacks in world war 2, the southern was back up and running within 48 hours or so, with track equipment provided from in house workshops.
The cost, of course, would be storing all these parts. That's likely to be quite expensive I suppose.
Looked like one at Elephant and Castle for today and tomorrow (perhaps the stop was later withdrawn).
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O34954/2014/10/02/advanced
I'm not trying to defend the position - just explaining.
Although I'm not complaining; the direct Hither Green to Victoria trains are very handy for me!RAIL said:The closure of one route through Buckland Junction for four weeks because of a defective crossing (RAIL 688) is a terrible indictment on Network Rail and its National Delivery Service (NDS).
For 15 years following privatisation, Eastleigh S&C Ltd provided a national emergency supply service for switches and crossings (S&C). It was able to supply almost any unit within a few days, and often within 12 hours of receiving a phone call - and judging from the photograph the crossing could have been easily supplied the same day and installed instead of the plain rail.
Eastleigh was able to provide this service because it deliberately held a wide range of part-manufactured items and sub-components that it could finish quickly to suit site-specific conditions.
Moreover, it did not take on significant run-of-the-mill work, so as to be ready to respond instantly - and for years it was never without adequate work!
Inevitably there had to be a premium price for such emergency supplies. But when viewed overall, including disruption costs, the service was an absolute bargain.
Latterly NDS sought to reduce the number of manufacturers supplying S&C to NR, and to obtain emergency items at the similar prices to normal lead time products.
It phased out using Eastleigh S&C, and the company closed down a year ago. Even then, NDS refused the offer of the £1 million worth of stock at half-price, and it all went for scrap (or to preserved railways that recognised a bargain!).
One justification was the creation of an S&C recycling operation at its March depot, but that facility does not have any of the equipment or rational sets of kit necessary for providing a crossing for Buckland.
Unfortunately Buckland Junction is not an isolated case. There are emergency speed restrictions all over the country where emergency S&C replacement units are awaited, and recently four platforms at Waterloo were closed for several days - but too high profile to wait a month!
And yes, I have a vested interest. I was one of three redundant BR staff who knew of the need for emergency S&C, and so took the huge risk to set up Eastleigh S&C Ltd in 1996. It is very sad to see that Network Rail is clearly unable to match the service we provided.
Jim Wheeler, Surbiton
The standard for track maintenance is owned by NR, not RSSB. NR/L2/TRK/001 to be precise.
All should be back to normal Monday 27th October.