Also, forgive my ignorance, but can't we put some of these problems down to the absence of a guard on many modern units?
Not really, if its the SWT service then they all have a guard on board.
The difficult situation described by jonmorris would leave me feeling very, very nervous on FCC.
However - on a pacer? Easy as pie - get on and off at the back, the guard won't close the doors on you!
My wife did consider a taxi but I am telling her to relax and it will be absolutely fine. But I do wonder how many people in this situation will just take a cab, or perhaps a coach? I know it's a perception thing and nothing to worry about, but some people will be nervous and apprehensive and not just rude and selfish. Arguably, if they do have trouble or are looked upon as people who shouldn't be there, the former might become the latter.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
My wife did consider a taxi but I am telling her to relax and it will be absolutely fine. But I do wonder how many people in this situation will just take a cab, or perhaps a coach? I know it's a perception thing and nothing to worry about, but some people will be nervous and apprehensive and not just rude and selfish. Arguably, if they do have trouble or are looked upon as people who shouldn't be there, the former might become the latter.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Might seem like a silly suggestion with a needless change, but would it be worth boarding one of the Sutton services starting at St Albans, and changing at Farringdon for a Gatwick service? The slows starting at St Albans do stable there for a few minutes so there would be no issues getting on there (and obviously, as it starts there, you'd get a seat - plus they tend to be a lot quieter) plus at Farringdon you'd get a longer dwell due to the OHLE/3rd rail crossover?
I'm playing devil's advocate here a bit, but for those who do choose a cab or a coach, isn't that better for both parties if the trains are so full that it's difficult to get on? Or if they feel they will have difficulty in managing?
Of course, no one should be looked on as if they have no right to be there, for the reason you state, but it surely comes down to personal choice in the end. Elderly people with luggage may also choose a coach or a taxi for the same reasons, as they don't have to struggle on and off trains with their bags!
The coach from Stansted to Gatwick stops at Hatfield outside the Galleria...
I do think a fair few people don't use trains for that reason. Irregular users might also be put off by the negative press the railway gets too. In practice, there's usually no problem and staff are very helpful, but how many people even try because they believe that they read/hear?
The changeover takes seconds and doesn't add to the dwell time.plus at Farringdon you'd get a longer dwell due to the OHLE/3rd rail crossover?
She's taken the coach to Heathrow before, and it was pretty quick, but I suspect the one to Gatwick would be quite a mission. My son might also get a bit restless. Not only that, but he loves going on trains!
Excuse the passenger for not understanding the psychology of boarding trains. How many people can be expected to know that commuters generally board the middle coaches at x station?
Also, distraught doesn't just denote sadness, but also worry. Therefore a woman who is unduly worried at the prospect of boarding busy trains with a pushchair could indeed be said to be distraught.
Good customer service suggests that staff should notice the issue and intervene rather than passenger having to ask for help - travelling on the Victoria Line in the morning peak the other day, grandmother with buggy, mother carrying baby boarded and platform staff looked in the door to make sure they were on okay and someone had offered up their seat. That is good customer practice.
Given that large numbers of people interchange at Clapham Junc I am surprised there was no room as people got off - unless people getting on just jumped in front of her.
When I used to take my young children to a child minder on the old routemasters (so folded buggy in one hand, child in other) it was interesting to see the attitude of conductors, ranging from total disinterest whether you got on or not to telling people to give up your seat for you and helping you on board.
Why would you give up trying to catch a train which run every few minutes and take about 10mins to get to Waterloo for a bus which are less frequent, take around an hour, may not go where you want to and there is no guarantee you will get on and you have to try and persuade someone to reimburse your fare.
Are there lifts at Clapham Junction - its no joke carry buggy and baby up and down stairs although people are often kind enough to offer to help.
It was a complete shock to travel with children in Paris, we were ushered to the front of queues and people allowed us to board metro trains first - I was very impressed.
Nowhere have I seen signs to say a buggy must be folded and a baby carried on.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Pushchairs should be folded, however some people refuse to fold them or bring non-folding ones.
Doubling-back into Waterloo may resolve the issue though...
Who says they must be folded before boarding a train? SWT's passenger charter suggests the opposite.Quite right... all pushchairs are supposed to be folded before boarding the train. Alas, very rarely are they!
Who says they must be folded before boarding a train? SWT's passenger charter suggests the opposite.
According to FGW this is a 'polite request but not mandatory'.I can't comment on SWT's stations but on FGW there are announcements that say something like "Customers with pushchairs are reminded to make sure the brake is on whilst waiting on the platform, and you are requested to fold your pushchair before boarding."
I want to see these rules, as well as proof that it's common sense to always fold a buggy before boarding.
I think that if the options are:
1) Baby secured in buggy, lifted up at the front, and pushed on to the train - then secured, baby out, fold up buggy. When getting off, same process in reverse, stepping out of train backwards and pulling buggy down on to the platform.
2) Take baby out of buggy, attach a tether (or just cross your fingers), hold tether somehow (in hand, or under foot which will just get pulled out as soon as s/he wanders off) while folding buggy up (keeping an eye on baby at all times, especially if the train is actually approaching and not already there with the doors open and everyone wondering what you're doing when there's a 25 second dwell time to do all this, and you're still faffing around with the buggy), lift up baby and support in your arms, then bend down to pick up the buggy, and now get on, along with any other bags you might have (from the obligatory changing bag, to stuff you might reasonably be carrying, like shopping or luggage). All the while making sure that you don't slip or drop any of these things.
If number 2 is the common sense option, then all I can say is Jesus!
And what if said baby can't walk yet? Leave it lying down on the platform then scoop it up?
Folding buggies is something that many signs say to do, especially if a wheelchair user needs a space. I do think some people have got their wires crossed if they think it should be folded for the purpose of getting on or off a train.
Again, I'd love to see what idiot has actually produced documentation to suggest that. Even before I was a parent, I'd have thought that this was insane advice. I'm quite surprised so many people actually think this is logical.
I'd love to know what the parents of these people did if they ever got taken on buses and trains when they were that age.
According to FGW this is a 'polite request but not mandatory'.
Actually if you read that article you'll get a good idea of the problems that can be caused by trying to fold a buggy before boarding.
I wanted to point out that the internal gangway doors are emergency exits
Not according to one EMT, who told me that it was safe to have bikes blocking the vestibules as 'no one ever needs to move coaches' and when asked what would happen in the case off an emergency 'they won't be one', so if train staff don't have this attitude what chance is there of passengers having it.
(sorry for the off topic post)