Haywain
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 24,781
Wrong.And I assume that most people on long-distance journeys are on business travel, right?
Wrong.And I assume that most people on long-distance journeys are on business travel, right?
And I assume that most people on long-distance journeys are on business travel, right?
Whilst many people are happy to accept the restrictions of Advance ticket, they need to do so in full knowledge of what they're doing.
With the complexity of the ticketing regime, full knowledge is unlikely outside the most fastidious members of this Forum.
Advance restrictions are not the only ones to reduce flexibility; Route, Time and Operator restrictions also reduce flexibility, and it is challenging for most passengers to fully appreciate the degree of flexibility they sacrifice (or gain) when assessing the relative values of the range of fares available.
One benefit of this sort of Advance pricing is that it does mean a single journey can be done affordably. Walk-up fares on most TOCs are overpriced for a single.
So it might save you £1 on a return journey, but other than LNER who do have half-priced singles it could easily save you £50 on a long single journey.
It would be interesting, and perhaps more honest, if this were presented in the same way as airline/hotel/whatever bookings often are:Just to be clear on my original point - I don't have any issues with 50p-cheaper Advance tickets over the cheapest flexible ticket **as long as** it's very clear to a layperson that they're giving up (significant) flexibility/features for 50p // they can get (significant) extra flexibility/features for 50p extra.
It would be interesting, and perhaps more honest, if this were presented in the same way as airline/hotel/whatever bookings often are:
Your journey price: £32.50
Add cancellation protection and return flexibility for an extra 50p? ☑️
I'm pretty sure we'd see a lot of people ticking that box if it were phrased like that.
Yeah, that's misleading in itself.But isn't that technically being sold as a separate "insurance" product?
It's certainly not insurance as that strays into another regulated industryBut isn't that technically being sold as a separate "insurance" product?