• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cricket

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SteveHFC

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2014
Messages
263
Was that international match yesterday the first one that Issy Wong has played in for England for quite some time?
She played in two of the T20s earlier this summer against West Indies, took 1-35 in 4 overs and 1-10 in 4 overs in the two games, didn't need to bat in either game.
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
2,033
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
Stokes won the toss and chose to bat, Plunkett was 1st out for 23 followed by Crawley in the same over for 18 leaving England 2-42 and Nitish Kumar Reddy with 2 for 5 in his first over.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,509
Plunkett was 1st out for 23 followed by Crawley in the same over for 18 leaving England 2-42 and Nitish Kumar Reddy with 2 for 5 in his first over.
Duckett (rather than Plunkett!) was beaten by a slower ball getting a glance off the bottom of the bat; Crawley's was an absolute corker of a ball with a bit of away swing and a thin edge - both caught behind.
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
2,033
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
Duckett (rather than Plunkett!) was beaten by a slower ball getting a glance off the bottom of the bat; Crawley's was an absolute corker of a ball with a bit of away swing and a thin edge - both caught behind.
Don't know where I got Plunkett from.
Got to agree the ball that got Crawley was superb.
 

SteveHFC

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2014
Messages
263
Well that was like rewinding a few years today! Back to old school test cricket. A decent day overall, England probably happier than India.
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
2,033
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
Well that was like rewinding a few years today! Back to old school test cricket. A decent day overall, England probably happier than India.
England finished on 4-251 after 83!! overs.

The Not Out Batters being Joe Root on 99 and a limping Ben Stokes on 39

Lots of excuses for the appalling over rate, including multiple claims that the ball was out of shape and a swarm of Ladybirds.
 

D1511

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2023
Messages
1,199
Location
WCML N
Root has just surpassed the number of catches in tests (for non WKs), and I doubt he's taken a better one than his 211th today.
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
2,033
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
Root has just surpassed the number of catches in tests (for non WKs), and I doubt he's taken a better one than his 211th today.
Have to agree it really was a brilliant catch, Jofra Archer took a wicket with the 3rd ball of his comeback with India 3-145 off 43 overs at the close.
 

3rd rail land

Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
730
Location
Where the 3rd rail powers the trains
Bonkers Blast match between Surrey and Glamorgan in London this evening. Glamorgan scored 222 and Surrey were 16-3 early on, which given an injury to Laurie Evans was effectively 16-4, and they ended on 224-4 with 5 balls to spare. Dan Lawrence scored 120*
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
5,948
Bonkers Blast match between Surrey and Glamorgan in London this evening. Glamorgan scored 222 and Surrey were 16-3 early on, which given an injury to Laurie Evans was effectively 16-4, and they ended on 224-4 with 5 balls to spare. Dan Lawrence scored 120*
Lawrence's strike rate was 222, the highest in the match.

A combined total of 446 for 10 off 39.1 overs.
 

EbbwJunction1

Established Member
Joined
25 Mar 2010
Messages
1,758
Location
Newport, South Wales
I haven't been to a Test match for many years.

There hasn't been a specific reason, although availability has been a large part of why I haven't gone. Now that I'm retired, I do have more time and have thought of going to a Test this year or next year. However, a disincentive is definitely the feeling that if I did go, I'd be short-changed because they don't play all the overs during the first four days. Today, of course, has probably been the worse day, as there were fifteen (yes, fifteen) un-bowled overs which is, I think, unacceptable.

Not having seen the terms and conditions of purchasing a ticket for a long while, I don't know what they say about un-bowled overs. I do wonder, though, whether they include a commitment to bowl a set number of overs - say a percentage of the 90 overs? If there is such a commitment, would there be a case for legal action to recover a percentage of the cost of the ticket?

Discuss .... !!
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,289
I haven't been to a Test match for many years.

There hasn't been a specific reason, although availability has been a large part of why I haven't gone. Now that I'm retired, I do have more time and have thought of going to a Test this year or next year. However, a disincentive is definitely the feeling that if I did go, I'd be short-changed because they don't play all the overs during the first four days. Today, of course, has probably been the worse day, as there were fifteen (yes, fifteen) un-bowled overs which is, I think, unacceptable.

Not having seen the terms and conditions of purchasing a ticket for a long while, I don't know what they say about un-bowled overs. I do wonder, though, whether they include a commitment to bowl a set number of overs - say a percentage of the 90 overs? If there is such a commitment, would there be a case for legal action to recover a percentage of the cost of the ticket?

Discuss .... !!
You only get any money back if fewer than 30 overs are bowled. So that is only going to come into play when there are major rain delays, no team is going to bowl that slowly!
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
2,033
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
First ever Day/Night game started this Evening in Jamaica, Pat Cummins won the toss and chose to bat. A painful 1st session saw the Baggy Greens 1-50. Sam Kostas was out LBW to Justin Greaves for 17 off 53 balls...........
Already the hosts have bowled 5 No Balls & 2 Wides!

Lets hope the second session livens up.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,509
You only get any money back if fewer than 30 overs are bowled. So that is only going to come into play when there are major rain delays, no team is going to bowl that slowly!
So today we got to the dizzy heights of 80 overs being bowled, and still no warnings or penalties imposed or, it appears, any interest from the umpires in speeding things up.
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,504
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
Brilliant to see the Indians, especially their Captain, moaning about England's time wasting at the end of Saturday's play! Mr Gill's 'injury', which could only be treated on the field of play, comes to mind....
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,509
At the second break Oz were 3-138 after 52 overs.
Smithy is 36 not out and Cameron Green scored 46 before being bowled by Jayden Seales.
At the close Aus 225 all out and WIndies 16/1 (or 1/16 for our upside down friends). 82 overs of play.
 
Last edited:

scarby

Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
888
What's the penalty for a slow over rate in red ball cricket? In the County Champonship they manage 96 overs a day so 90 should be easy providibg it doesn't rain.
In the County Championship they are to bowl 16 per hour and each over they fall short is a 1 point deduction.

The umpires make a lot of allowances though, such as for fall of wickets and more, so it’s not that uncommon for play to finish after 7pm with no deduction.

Your main point stands though!

In the Blast they get through 40 overs in around a maximum of 2 hours and 50 minutes of playing time despite having to retrieve all the balls whacked to the boundary and sometimes many wickets falling. The umpires are quite strict on the last over of an innings commencing after 75 minutes, though in the end there’s usually 5 minutes added on plus the time to bowl the last over.
 

EbbwJunction1

Established Member
Joined
25 Mar 2010
Messages
1,758
Location
Newport, South Wales
You only get any money back if fewer than 30 overs are bowled. So that is only going to come into play when there are major rain delays, no team is going to bowl that slowly!
Thanks; I appreciate that and, in fact, have benefitted from it in the past.

It is, though, a different situation, as I'm talking about a full day's play which is unaffected by the weather but is affected by the inability / unwillingness of the players to bowl the number of overs that they should bowl.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,509
It is, though, a different situation, as I'm talking about a full day's play which is unaffected by the weather but is affected by the inability / unwillingness of the players to bowl the number of overs that they should bowl.
Worth noting that over the first 3 days of the current Lord's test we have lost more than an entire session of play - a total of 32 overs so far.
 

Top