Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
Was that international match yesterday the first one that Issy Wong has played in for England for quite some time?
She played in two of the T20s earlier this summer against West Indies, took 1-35 in 4 overs and 1-10 in 4 overs in the two games, didn't need to bat in either game.Was that international match yesterday the first one that Issy Wong has played in for England for quite some time?
Duckett (rather than Plunkett!) was beaten by a slower ball getting a glance off the bottom of the bat; Crawley's was an absolute corker of a ball with a bit of away swing and a thin edge - both caught behind.Plunkett was 1st out for 23 followed by Crawley in the same over for 18 leaving England 2-42 and Nitish Kumar Reddy with 2 for 5 in his first over.
Don't know where I got Plunkett from.Duckett (rather than Plunkett!) was beaten by a slower ball getting a glance off the bottom of the bat; Crawley's was an absolute corker of a ball with a bit of away swing and a thin edge - both caught behind.
England finished on 4-251 after 83!! overs.Well that was like rewinding a few years today! Back to old school test cricket. A decent day overall, England probably happier than India.
No….. England finished on 251-4 after 83!! overs.England finished on 4-251 after 83!! overs.
England now 299-7 after 92 overs with Root, Stokes and Woakes all dismissed by Bumrah on the first few overs of the morning session.No….. England finished on 251-4 after 83!! overs.
We are not in Australia![]()
England all out for 387, Brydon Carse was last out for 56, his 1st Test Match 50.England now 299-7 after 92 overs with Root, Stokes and Woakes all dismissed by Bumrah on the first few overs of the morning session.
Four of Bumrah's dismissals were clean bowled.England all out for 387, Brydon Carse was last out for 56, his 1st Test Match 50.
Definite pick of the Bowlers as ever was Jasprit Bumrah with 5-74
Have to agree it really was a brilliant catch, Jofra Archer took a wicket with the 3rd ball of his comeback with India 3-145 off 43 overs at the close.Root has just surpassed the number of catches in tests (for non WKs), and I doubt he's taken a better one than his 211th today.
Lawrence's strike rate was 222, the highest in the match.Bonkers Blast match between Surrey and Glamorgan in London this evening. Glamorgan scored 222 and Surrey were 16-3 early on, which given an injury to Laurie Evans was effectively 16-4, and they ended on 224-4 with 5 balls to spare. Dan Lawrence scored 120*
Now if only teams could score this quickly in red ball cricket we could avoid the masses of draws we currently get.Lawrence's strike rate was 222, the highest in the match.
A combined total of 446 for 10 off 39.1 overs.
The ECB were feeling left out of franchise cricket...And yet we need the Hundred
True dat!The ECB were feeling left out of franchise cricket..
Day 2 saw a mere 75 overs including the innings change. Absolutely abysmal.after 83!! overs.
What's the penalty for a slow over rate in red ball cricket? In the County Champonship they manage 96 overs a day so 90 should be easy providibg it doesn't rain.Day 2 saw a mere 75 overs including the innings change. Absolutely abysmal.
Day 2 saw a mere 75 overs including the innings change. Absolutely abysmal.
You only get any money back if fewer than 30 overs are bowled. So that is only going to come into play when there are major rain delays, no team is going to bowl that slowly!I haven't been to a Test match for many years.
There hasn't been a specific reason, although availability has been a large part of why I haven't gone. Now that I'm retired, I do have more time and have thought of going to a Test this year or next year. However, a disincentive is definitely the feeling that if I did go, I'd be short-changed because they don't play all the overs during the first four days. Today, of course, has probably been the worse day, as there were fifteen (yes, fifteen) un-bowled overs which is, I think, unacceptable.
Not having seen the terms and conditions of purchasing a ticket for a long while, I don't know what they say about un-bowled overs. I do wonder, though, whether they include a commitment to bowl a set number of overs - say a percentage of the 90 overs? If there is such a commitment, would there be a case for legal action to recover a percentage of the cost of the ticket?
Discuss .... !!
So today we got to the dizzy heights of 80 overs being bowled, and still no warnings or penalties imposed or, it appears, any interest from the umpires in speeding things up.You only get any money back if fewer than 30 overs are bowled. So that is only going to come into play when there are major rain delays, no team is going to bowl that slowly!
At the close Aus 225 all out and WIndies 16/1 (or 1/16 for our upside down friends). 82 overs of play.At the second break Oz were 3-138 after 52 overs.
Smithy is 36 not out and Cameron Green scored 46 before being bowled by Jayden Seales.
In the County Championship they are to bowl 16 per hour and each over they fall short is a 1 point deduction.What's the penalty for a slow over rate in red ball cricket? In the County Champonship they manage 96 overs a day so 90 should be easy providibg it doesn't rain.
Thanks; I appreciate that and, in fact, have benefitted from it in the past.You only get any money back if fewer than 30 overs are bowled. So that is only going to come into play when there are major rain delays, no team is going to bowl that slowly!
Worth noting that over the first 3 days of the current Lord's test we have lost more than an entire session of play - a total of 32 overs so far.It is, though, a different situation, as I'm talking about a full day's play which is unaffected by the weather but is affected by the inability / unwillingness of the players to bowl the number of overs that they should bowl.