• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 456's on the move?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
The coupling issue is one of electrical difference. They will work quite happily together (and have done so around the yards) but the problem arises when someone presses the Call for Aid in a 456 and it's being driven from a 455. The PIS/CtC/CFA module fitted to the 456s is a very different spec to the SWT 455s, and the Call for Aid is integral to that new system. The small mods done at Wolverton will undo this change, and the Driver of a 455 will quite happily be able to detect that someone is pressing the big red button in a 456 on the back (or vice versa).

Not a "can't do", a "won't do" until it's safe.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,226
Does anyone know which 456's are working at the moment looking for 456011 is this working Ascot - Guildford services or in for refurb. Thanks

456011 is one of the units currently in service.
 

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,370
The coupling issue is one of electrical difference. They will work quite happily together (and have done so around the yards) but the problem arises when someone presses the Call for Aid in a 456 and it's being driven from a 455. The PIS/CtC/CFA module fitted to the 456s is a very different spec to the SWT 455s, and the Call for Aid is integral to that new system. The small mods done at Wolverton will undo this change, and the Driver of a 455 will quite happily be able to detect that someone is pressing the big red button in a 456 on the back (or vice versa).

Not a "can't do", a "won't do" until it's safe.

Thanks for the confirmation mate, I figured it had to be something electrical or to do with the PIS/CFA. :)
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
5,078
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
456+455+455 10-car trundling in and out of Waterloo today - looked to be marking up the platforms for something like Guard door release boards but could have been anything involving men in orange vests and spraypaint on the platform I suppose.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,854
Location
Beeston (Notts)
456+455+455 10-car trundling in and out of Waterloo today - looked to be marking up the platforms for something like Guard door release boards but could have been anything involving men in orange vests and spraypaint on the platform I suppose.

Which 456 was it? SWT colours or pale, faded Southern ones?
 

hassaanhc

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
2,225
Location
Southall
Which 456 was it? SWT colours or pale, faded Southern ones?

Southern colours, with the 456 on the London end http://twitter.com/Sideshow_Matt/status/480713286275825665/photo/1
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
456+455+455 10-car trundling in and out of Waterloo today - looked to be marking up the platforms for something like Guard door release boards but could have been anything involving men in orange vests and spraypaint on the platform I suppose.

Comment in the above Twitter link suggests "10 car cctv commissioning test run. [Wimbledon] Park to Wat. Both ways round kingston loop then one hounslow"
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,226
That would make sense. I'm not sure of what station have the equipment fitted but many SWT stations have CCTV equipment fitted to allow the guard to view the full length on the platform. It's interesting to note, and something I didn't realise, that Southern are running 10-car trains between Leatherhead and Guildford every Monday-Friday morning. Platforms along there were lengthened mainly for 10-car SWT services.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
4,084
The coupling issue is one of electrical difference. They will work quite happily together (and have done so around the yards) but the problem arises when someone presses the Call for Aid in a 456 and it's being driven from a 455. The PIS/CtC/CFA module fitted to the 456s is a very different spec to the SWT 455s, and the Call for Aid is integral to that new system. The small mods done at Wolverton will undo this change, and the Driver of a 455 will quite happily be able to detect that someone is pressing the big red button in a 456 on the back (or vice versa).

Not a "can't do", a "won't do" until it's safe.

ah that rings a bell now, had problems coupling a 455 and 456 once at vic because of problems with the pass comm alarm button on the PIS module...
 

Bigfoot

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2013
Messages
1,415
Signs up advising car park users of low loader delivery at WD tonight........

Much cones and barriers in place in carpark with people in his gesturing wildly as I passed on the up fast just now...
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Driver H. Potter(@DriverPotter) tweeted at 2014-06-27 00:36:
I spy with my little eye, something beginning with "456." #newtoy #456003 #swtrains #10carrailway #hashtagoverload http://pic.twitter.com/GxwrGQHdB2
GxwrGQHdB2
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Doesn't look quite as bad in the metro livery as what I expected. Looks like they've changed the shades of blue and yellow used unless that's just down to the ambient light conditions (looking at that photo and a pic of a 455 taken during the daytime).
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
Weren't these beasts intended for south west trains (nse) when built?

They did see use on the branches that became Tramlink, and I guess what's now the Wimbledon branch of that system might have been part of the SouthWest franchise if it had stayed as heavy rail.

I agree that it looks far better in the great outdoors than it did inside!
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,617
Location
Hampshire
They did see use on the branches that became Tramlink, and I guess what's now the Wimbledon branch of that system might have been part of the SouthWest franchise if it had stayed as heavy rail.

I agree that it looks far better in the great outdoors than it did inside!

Weren't these beasts intended for south west trains (nse) when built?

Indeed they were originally built for NSE's South Western division and were originally to see service on what they will largely working now out of Waterloo, but were hastily diverted to work for NSE's South Central division instead to replace the then elderly 2 EPBs still in use with NSE at the time, where they remained ever since until last year.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
They did see use on the branches that became Tramlink, and I guess what's now the Wimbledon branch of that system might have been part of the SouthWest franchise if it had stayed as heavy rail.

I'm fairly certain that the Wimbledon - West Croydon line was around for the very first couple of years of privatisation, but It wasn't an SW line, it was an SC line, which is why photos like this exist:
Last_Day_for_Wimbledon_to_West_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_795513.jpg
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
988
Wimbledon - West Croydon closed 31st May 1997 (3 years into privatisation) operated by Connex SouthCentral. The Elmers End - Addiscombe line (what was left of it) closed on the same day having been operated by Connex SouthEastern.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,617
Location
Hampshire
More external pictures from Anthony Christie on his page. One thing I've noticed though, the light's have been changed to the latest BMAC but stand prouder of the 456s face than the originals for some reason. Doesn't look too bad, but I'd possibly have taken the black above the windscreen - doesn't look as odd as London Midlands green 321 face though! Good to finally start seeing some progress on the SWT side though! And the interior looks rather good and suitable for the journeys that the 456s will be on. Presumably they'll be receiving SWTs digital Dorris at some point to replace Southern's Sonia?

http://antony-christie.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/south-west-trains-refurbished-class-456.html
 

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,370
I think they look very smart, a vast improvement over their previous incarnation. SWT red suits them!
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,617
Location
Hampshire
I've just noticed too, They've taken the 456s eyebrows off from above their multi working cables! Which combined with the LED lights give it a slightly started look. But I rather agree with Monty, they are looking smarter than their previous incarnation in the former Southern livery - perhaps it's Southern's livery that's starting to look outdated too, the 455s also prove the point.

As for the PA, I did notice something in this photo but it looks like the older Southern one than the SWT type. That said, the Southern effort was located behind the cab so that obviously is the SWT one. Not that it matters!

http://paulbigland.zenfolio.com/p75955891/h2362f12c#h8f825d1
 

DJL

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2013
Messages
310
I've just noticed too, They've taken the 456s eyebrows off from above their multi working cables!


I, personally, think that change alone makes a big, and positive, difference to their appearance
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,588
Location
Leeds
My opinion is that Southern's livery on the 455s is the nicest - I know, it's absolute heresy. ;)

Back onto the 456s, SWT really does suit it. Much nicer than NSE, which made them look unwieldy and chunky, and Southern's colour palette felt too pale for a two car unit.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
4,084
My opinion is that Southern's livery on the 455s is the nicest - I know, it's absolute heresy. ;)

Back onto the 456s, SWT really does suit it. Much nicer than NSE, which made them look unwieldy and chunky, and Southern's colour palette felt too pale for a two car unit.

Southern livery would be better if the dark green blocks around the windows was continuous as a broad band along the length of the coach.

SWT livery (the blue and red versions) to me is too bright and unprofessional, although i must admit it looks ok on the 456
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top