JB25
Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 355
I'm assuming that the 2 units in Wimbledon Park sidings are for driver training. They seem to sporadically move up and down their road.
That training can't last very long.
I'm assuming that the 2 units in Wimbledon Park sidings are for driver training. They seem to sporadically move up and down their road.
That looks like wolverton not wabtec.
I meant just that the direct moves from Stewarts Lane to Wolverton might not need to have have anything to do with SWT. It is surely taken as read that the purpose of the actual overhaul is to bring them up to SWT's standards.If it is Swt or Porterbrook it seems likely it will be the start of overhaul to
Swt 455 standards.
I dont know if already posted but this is link for pdf about the proposed
refurbishment.
http://www.porterbrook.co.uk/downloads/brochures/456 Brochure.pdf
Sure I saw two units coupled together in service with Southern still on an Outer SLL service this evening?
It was dark, so couldn't get the number of the units.
This may be a dumb question, but why on earth are they going by road and not by rail?
Another on the move.
![]()
Has that 456 been split in half?hock:
Sure I saw two units coupled together in service with Southern still on an Outer SLL service this evening?
It was dark, so couldn't get the number of the units.
At a recent count up Southern still have 7 units available for 4 diagrams, until the last 377/6s are in service. Not likely to be seeing 456s for more tan a week or two, I'd think.
Stupid question probably, but why are they going to overhaul by road and not rail?
...they'd need dragging once they're off the juice rail which means hiring a FOC with locos, translator vehicles and extra vehicles for brake-force- and we're back to finding and paying for paths again...
The 456 set that was sitting in Wimbledon Park CSD was coupled between two 455s the other day, is that how they intend to run it? It had also disappeared from view by this evening - I'm guessing that it has shunted round to the side of the shed.
Of course it would make sense to couple a non gangwayed unit in between 2 gangwayed units doesnt it! :roll:
One of the reasons is to test the multiple working when coupled up, by coupling it in btween they can test the 456 with 2 class 455s, if they couple the 456 on the end then it would only be tested with one 455 at a time!
But no, I am sure you are right and I am wrong! :roll:
In this world of "Standards" you can never be too sure. For all we know, The corridor connections on the SWT 455s could have some sort of adverse affect on the coupling mechanism of the 456 :roll:
I cannot see that. They both have tightlock coupling devices and both probably have the same wiring. I can't imagine there is / will be a problem.
I think you have answered your own question there!
Yes they should work with our 455s but can you guarantee that?
Can I say yes?![]()
2x456 should move from the Park to Strawberry Hill at the start of January ready for driver training. Should be in service from end of March...